Foram encontradas 80 questões.
A L ei no 12.188, de 2010, institui a Política Nacional de Assistência Técnica e Extensão Rural para a Agricultura Familiar e Reforma Agrária – PNATER e o Programa Nacional de Assistência Técnica e Extensão Rural na Agricultura Familiar e na Reforma Agrária – PRONATER, altera a Lei n°8.666, de 21 de junho de 1993, e dá outras providências. De acordo com ela
Provas
Questão presente nas seguintes provas
De acordo com a Legislação Geral do Setor Agropecuário, da qual fazem parte os artigos 184 a 191 da Constituição Federal, a Lei 8.171, de 1991, a Lei 8.629, de 1993, a Lei 4.504, de 1964, e a Lei 11.326, de 2006, é correto afirmar que
Provas
Questão presente nas seguintes provas
O PRODECER, Programa de Cooperação Nipo-Brasileira para o Desenvolvimento dos Cerrados, foi implementado em 1978, com o intuito de promover a expansão da agricultura brasileira nas regiões do cerrado brasileiro. Sobre o Programa é correto afirmar:
I. O PRODECER I, estabelecido a partir de 1979, permitiu o desenvolvimento da produção de grãos em mais de 70 mil hectares nos estados de Goiás, Mato Grosso e Mato Grosso do Sul, com um investimento de U$ 50 milhões.
II. A terceira fase do Programa, PRODECER III, foi concebida originalmente para beneficiar 80 mil hectares nos estados do Tocantins e do Maranhão com um investimento de U$ 850 milhões, com planos de expansão para os Estados do Piauí, Pará e Rondônia.
III. Os recursos destinados para o Programa são oriundos de uma parceria entre os governos do Brasil e do Japão, na qual cada país compromete-se a disponibilizar 50% do montante em forma de financiamentos a fundo perdido.
Assinale
Provas
Questão presente nas seguintes provas
Em 2012, celebra-se o bicentenário de um novelista que retratou as transformações sociais da era industrial em uma nação europeia.
Trata-se de
Provas
Questão presente nas seguintes provas
Os dois confrontos mais sangrentos no Egito nos últimos quinze meses foram
Provas
Questão presente nas seguintes provas
O controle exerce, na administração sistêmica, papel fundamental no desempenho eficaz de qualquer organização. É por meio dele que são detectados eventuais desvios ou problemas que ocorrem durante a execução de um trabalho, possibilitando a adoção de medidas corretivas para que o processo seja reorientado na direção dos objetivos traçados pela organização. Na Administração Pública, a importância do controle foi destacada, principalmente, com o advento da Reforma Administrativa de 1967. Assim, o art. 6º do Decreto-Lei 200/1967 o coloca, ao lado do planejamento, da delegação de competência, da descentralização e da coordenação entre os cinco princípios fundamentais que norteiam as atividades da Administração Federal.
No que concerne aos controles interno e externo, é INCORRETO afirmar que
Provas
Questão presente nas seguintes provas
Considerando as recém-descobertas de petróleo na camada pré-sal, que representam um marco singular na indústria petrolífera brasileira, marque a alternativa correta.
Provas
Questão presente nas seguintes provas
Another view on representations and warranties
This article will address issues relating to representations and warranties as they arise in the common law, not in the context of the Uniform Commercial Code.
We will begin with representations. They are statements of present or past fact. Future "facts" cannot generally form the basis of representations because no one can know the future.
If a representation is intentionally false, a plaintiff can make a common law claim of deceit (a tort) and allege fraudulent misrepresentation.
Generally, a plaintiff injured by a fraudulent misrepresentation has a choice of remedies. She may rescind the contract and obtain restitutionary recovery, or she may affirm the contract and sue for damages. The ability to rescind — to unwind a closed transaction — is a remedy not available to a plaintiff suing for a breach of warranty, and therefore is a benefit of including representations in a contract. A second benefit is that the plaintiff may be able to obtain punitive damages under special circumstances.
Now, let's turn to warranties. A common law warranty isa promise that a fact is true. According to the New York court, a warranty is a promise of indemnity if a statement of fact is false. A promisee does not have to believe that the statement is true. Indeed, the warranty's purpose is to relieve a promisee from the obligation of determining a fact's truthfulness.
The meaning of warranty is critical to plaintiffs whose defendants made both representations and warranties since a plaintiff's fraudulent misrepresentation claim will fail if she knew the statement was false. But, the plaintiff may sue for breach of warranty on the same statement and recover despite knowledge of the falsity of the statement, subject to some limitations. This is a substantial business and legal reason for a party to receive both representations and warranties.
An example may help to clarify this issue: Occasionally, a buyer will ask a seller to represent as a fact something that the seller knows is not true or does not know whether it is true. Technically, doing so is fraud. A buyer nonetheless defends its request by telling the seller, "It's just risk allocation." In other words, even if the statement is not true, it represents the business deal.
A seller often accedes to this request on the theory that it is not fraud because it has "worked it out" with the buyer. This is cold comfort when the buyer sues for fraud, "forgetting" that it was "just risk allocation" and "forgetting" that the seller explained the situation's actual status. As an alternative, the seller can merely "warrant" the statement. In that case, the seller makes no representation that can be the basis of a fraudulent misrepresentation, and the warranty is the promise of indemnity, precisely the risk allocation the buyer sought.
Representations and warranties are important — but different — tools for the contract drafter. But receiving both of them from the other side usually — but not always — provides a client with the best protection.
(Tina L. Stark. Adaptado de: http://apps.americanbar.org/buslaw/blt/2006-01-02/nonbindingopinion.html
As used in the text, the term common law refers to
Provas
Questão presente nas seguintes provas
Another view on representations and warranties
This article will address issues relating to representations and warranties as they arise in the common law, not in the context of the Uniform Commercial Code.
We will begin with representations. They are statements of present or past fact. Future "facts" cannot generally form the basis of representations because no one can know the future.
If a representation is intentionally false, a plaintiff can make a common law claim of deceit (a tort) and allege fraudulent misrepresentation.
Generally, a plaintiff injured by a fraudulent misrepresentation has a choice of remedies. She may rescind the contract and obtain restitutionary recovery, or she may affirm the contract and sue for damages. The ability to rescind — to unwind a closed transaction — is a remedy not available to a plaintiff suing for a breach of warranty, and therefore is a benefit of including representations in a contract. A second benefit is that the plaintiff may be able to obtain punitive damages under special circumstances.
Now, let's turn to warranties. A common law warranty isa promise that a fact is true. According to the New York court, a warranty is a promise of indemnity if a statement of fact is false. A promisee does not have to believe that the statement is true. Indeed, the warranty's purpose is to relieve a promisee from the obligation of determining a fact's truthfulness.
The meaning of warranty is critical to plaintiffs whose defendants made both representations and warranties since a plaintiff's fraudulent misrepresentation claim will fail if she knew the statement was false. But, the plaintiff may sue for breach of warranty on the same statement and recover despite knowledge of the falsity of the statement, subject to some limitations. This is a substantial business and legal reason for a party to receive both representations and warranties.
An example may help to clarify this issue: Occasionally, a buyer will ask a seller to represent as a fact something that the seller knows is not true or does not know whether it is true. Technically, doing so is fraud. A buyer nonetheless defends its request by telling the seller, "It's just risk allocation." In other words, even if the statement is not true, it represents the business deal.
A seller often accedes to this request on the theory that it is not fraud because it has "worked it out" with the buyer. This is cold comfort when the buyer sues for fraud, "forgetting" that it was "just risk allocation" and "forgetting" that the seller explained the situation's actual status. As an alternative, the seller can merely "warrant" the statement. In that case, the seller makes no representation that can be the basis of a fraudulent misrepresentation, and the warranty is the promise of indemnity, precisely the risk allocation the buyer sought.
Representations and warranties are important — but different — tools for the contract drafter. But receiving both of them from the other side usually — but not always — provides a client with the best protection.
(Tina L. Stark. Adaptado de: http://apps.americanbar.org/buslaw/blt/2006-01-02/nonbindingopinion.html
Consider the statements below:
I. Representations and warranties are not inextricably linked. Some parties, as a matter of principle, refuse to take fraud risk (read punitive damages), and will not make representations, only warranties.
II. Representations, if shown to be false, and if the injured party knew them to be false, can give cause for the rescission of the agreement and the party making the representation can be sued for fraud.
III. A plaintiff may be able to win a breach of warranty claim when it would have lost a claim for fraudulent misrepresentation because it could not prove that the defendant knew the representation to be false.
According to the text
Provas
Questão presente nas seguintes provas
No tocante à evolução da administração pública, marque a alternativa correta:
Provas
Questão presente nas seguintes provas
Cadernos
Caderno Container