Baseado no texto Impacts of e-publishing, responda às questões de 91 a 98.

Texto: Impacts of e-publishing

Impacts on stakeholders' interrelationships

New entrants in the supply side of the scholarly communication system were enabled by the OA, strongly challenging the relationships among publishers, libraries and authors. Competitiveness has been gradually injected to the market, since the new entrants are now performing some of the scientific publishing functions, such as registering, archiving and dissemination11. The online resources promote a way for authors to increase their work dissemination and its consequent usage and impact (Harnad, 2005). Additionally, the academic actors have been realising that they can assume the performance of some processes in the scholarly communication system, for which they have been actually responsible for years (Crow, 2002, pp. 7-9).

Impacts on the publishers-researchers (as authors) interrelationships

The major e-publishing impacts on the publisher-researcher interrelationship have been observed on the controversial issues about copyright ownership and on the inclusion of researchers as the disseminators of their own work in any stage of its development. In an OA model, the copyright ownership is required to remain with authors or with the institution, which license specific rights to publishers. According to Crow (2002, pp. 21-22) the authors' retention of the copyright and the retention of the right to publish copies of their articles in OA journals or in institutional repositories (IRs) are essential elements of the changes which have being occurring in the scholarly

publishing system.

Currently, authors are still dependent on publishers for reusing their own material and for publishing it on the open access models. The authors' recovering of their copyright ownership affects this current relationship of dependence, because instead of assigning total copyright to publishers, authors can assign only specific rights to publishers, using licenses like the Creative Commons. Actually, publishers do not need copyright transfer agreements either to publish or to exploit the article commercially (Gaad et al., 2003, p.266, Hoorn, 2005, p.63). Therefore, the returning of the copyright ownership to authors' reduces their dependence on publishers freeing them to the dissemination and exploitation of their own research work for educational and commercial purposes.

In addition, the OA strategies have enabled researchers and institutions to become disseminators of their own intellectual production and to breach the distribution channel exclusivity owned by publishers. The dissemination of their own intellectual production can be made in any stage of its development as pre-refereed (pre-print) and refereed published articles (post-print). This has promoted the exchanging of ideas and comments about a work, its informal quality certification, and mainly its wider and free of charge dissemination. These new practices affect the relationship publishers-researchers, since researchers as authors start demanding the possibility to self-archive pre-prints of their work without affecting the possibility having it published further. Additionally, the use of OA journals as a complement to traditional publishers'* work can be identified by the growing participation of authors in OA journals, rising from 11% (in January 2004) to 29% (in July 2005) (Rowlands & Nicholas, 2006, p.44).

Within this scenario, the growing of free online scientific content which is resulted from authors' dissemination can pressure traditional publishers to refocus their offerings and to offer more valued services beyond the single content delivery.

(Fonte: Ciência da Informação, Brasília, v. 36, n. 1, p. 158-166, jan./abr. 2007.)

A ideia principal do texto denota que:

Na Library of Congress Subject Headings, a divisão paralela é dada pelos seguintes dispositivos:

Santos e Tolfo (2006) realizaram uma pesquisa sobre as demandas dos bibliotecários frente às novas tecnologias de informação em bilbiotecas universitárias. Após a entrevista, os dados extraídos pelas autoras revelaram as competências abaixo:

I – trabalhar em equipe

II – compartilhar informações

III – saber gerenciar recursos humanos

IV – priorizar o recurso informacional em detrimento do usuário

Após análise das afirmativas acima, pode-se dizer que o número de itens corretos é:

Baseado no texto Understanding University Library Users' Mistreatment of Books, responda às questões de 76 a 85.

TEXTO: Understanding University Library Users' Mistreatment of Books Carmen Pérez, Manuel Cuadrado and Amparo Cervera University of Valencia, Spain Available online 20 February 2009. Abstract This paper analyses university library users' attitudes towards book vandalism in order to develop a basis for intervention. Using a customer oriented approach data was collected from users who attended an academic library exhibition on vandalized books at a University campus. Respondants were asked both for their reactions to the vandalism as well as to suggest measures to solve this problem. Punishment and surveillance were most frequently mentioned as preventative measures although users also recognized the utility of the exhibition in increasing awareness of book mutilation. Further implications of social marketing for libraries are also discussed. Article Outline Introduction Book Mistreatment Empirical Research. Objectives and Methodology Results User's Opinions on Book Mutilation User's Features User's Solution to Prevent Book Mutilation Conclusion Acknowledgements Appendix A. Supplementary data References Supplementary material. Table 1. Measures Taken to Prevent Library Book Mutilation Source: Burrows and Cooper (1992). Table 2. Sample Features (n = 230) Table 3. Results Related Mistreated Books Table 4. Mistreatment According to Gender and Chi-Squared Test Table 5. Mistreatment According to Studies Table 6. Opinions About Mistreated Books According to Occupation Table 7. Proposed Solutions for Preventing Book Mistreatment http://www.sciencedirect.com/%3Csup%3E%3Cimg src=Supplementary data associated with article can be found in the full-text version on ScienceDirect. http://www.sciencedirect.com/%3Csup%3E%3Cimg src=Corresponding author

Baseado no texto Impacts of e-publishing, responda às questões de 91 a 98.

Texto: Impacts of e-publishing

Impacts on stakeholders' interrelationships

New entrants in the supply side of the scholarly communication system were enabled by the OA, strongly challenging the relationships among publishers, libraries and authors. Competitiveness has been gradually injected to the market, since the new entrants are now performing some of the scientific publishing functions, such as registering, archiving and dissemination11. The online resources promote a way for authors to increase their work dissemination and its consequent usage and impact (Harnad, 2005). Additionally, the academic actors have been realising that they can assume the performance of some processes in the scholarly communication system, for which they have been actually responsible for years (Crow, 2002, pp. 7-9).

Impacts on the publishers-researchers (as authors) interrelationships

The major e-publishing impacts on the publisher-researcher interrelationship have been observed on the controversial issues about copyright ownership and on the inclusion of researchers as the disseminators of their own work in any stage of its development. In an OA model, the copyright ownership is required to remain with authors or with the institution, which license specific rights to publishers. According to Crow (2002, pp. 21-22) the authors' retention of the copyright and the retention of the right to publish copies of their articles in OA journals or in institutional repositories (IRs) are essential elements of the changes which have being occurring in the scholarly

publishing system.

Currently, authors are still dependent on publishers for reusing their own material and for publishing it on the open access models. The authors' recovering of their copyright ownership affects this current relationship of dependence, because instead of assigning total copyright to publishers, authors can assign only specific rights to publishers, using licenses like the Creative Commons. Actually, publishers do not need copyright transfer agreements either to publish or to exploit the article commercially (Gaad et al., 2003, p.266, Hoorn, 2005, p.63). Therefore, the returning of the copyright ownership to authors' reduces their dependence on publishers freeing them to the dissemination and exploitation of their own research work for educational and commercial purposes.

In addition, the OA strategies have enabled researchers and institutions to become disseminators of their own intellectual production and to breach the distribution channel exclusivity owned by publishers. The dissemination of their own intellectual production can be made in any stage of its development as pre-refereed (pre-print) and refereed published articles (post-print). This has promoted the exchanging of ideas and comments about a work, its informal quality certification, and mainly its wider and free of charge dissemination. These new practices affect the relationship publishers-researchers, since researchers as authors start demanding the possibility to self-archive pre-prints of their work without affecting the possibility having it published further. Additionally, the use of OA journals as a complement to traditional publishers'* work can be identified by the growing participation of authors in OA journals, rising from 11% (in January 2004) to 29% (in July 2005) (Rowlands & Nicholas, 2006, p.44).

Within this scenario, the growing of free online scientific content which is resulted from authors' dissemination can pressure traditional publishers to refocus their offerings and to offer more valued services beyond the single content delivery.

(Fonte: Ciência da Informação, Brasília, v. 36, n. 1, p. 158-166, jan./abr. 2007.)

The word still presents a certain meaning in “Currently, authors are still dependent on publishers for reusing their own material and for publishing it on open access models.”, and it has a different meaning in:

Baseado no texto READ, responda às questões 86 a 90.

No modelo de referência para apresentação de monografias no todo em meio eletrônico, a NBR 6023 estabelece que, quando se tratar de obras consultadas on line, são essenciais as seguintes informações:

A expressão et al, de acordo com a NBR6023, ocorrerá quando existirem:

Baseado no texto Impacts of e-publishing, responda às questões de 91 a 98.

Texto: Impacts of e-publishing

Impacts on stakeholders' interrelationships

New entrants in the supply side of the scholarly communication system were enabled by the OA, strongly challenging the relationships among publishers, libraries and authors. Competitiveness has been gradually injected to the market, since the new entrants are now performing some of the scientific publishing functions, such as registering, archiving and dissemination11. The online resources promote a way for authors to increase their work dissemination and its consequent usage and impact (Harnad, 2005). Additionally, the academic actors have been realising that they can assume the performance of some processes in the scholarly communication system, for which they have been actually responsible for years (Crow, 2002, pp. 7-9).

Impacts on the publishers-researchers (as authors) interrelationships

The major e-publishing impacts on the publisher-researcher interrelationship have been observed on the controversial issues about copyright ownership and on the inclusion of researchers as the disseminators of their own work in any stage of its development. In an OA model, the copyright ownership is required to remain with authors or with the institution, which license specific rights to publishers. According to Crow (2002, pp. 21-22) the authors' retention of the copyright and the retention of the right to publish copies of their articles in OA journals or in institutional repositories (IRs) are essential elements of the changes which have being occurring in the scholarly

publishing system.

Currently, authors are still dependent on publishers for reusing their own material and for publishing it on the open access models. The authors' recovering of their copyright ownership affects this current relationship of dependence, because instead of assigning total copyright to publishers, authors can assign only specific rights to publishers, using licenses like the Creative Commons. Actually, publishers do not need copyright transfer agreements either to publish or to exploit the article commercially (Gaad et al., 2003, p.266, Hoorn, 2005, p.63). Therefore, the returning of the copyright ownership to authors' reduces their dependence on publishers freeing them to the dissemination and exploitation of their own research work for educational and commercial purposes.

In addition, the OA strategies have enabled researchers and institutions to become disseminators of their own intellectual production and to breach the distribution channel exclusivity owned by publishers. The dissemination of their own intellectual production can be made in any stage of its development as pre-refereed (pre-print) and refereed published articles (post-print). This has promoted the exchanging of ideas and comments about a work, its informal quality certification, and mainly its wider and free of charge dissemination. These new practices affect the relationship publishers-researchers, since researchers as authors start demanding the possibility to self-archive pre-prints of their work without affecting the possibility having it published further. Additionally, the use of OA journals as a complement to traditional publishers'* work can be identified by the growing participation of authors in OA journals, rising from 11% (in January 2004) to 29% (in July 2005) (Rowlands & Nicholas, 2006, p.44).

Within this scenario, the growing of free online scientific content which is resulted from authors' dissemination can pressure traditional publishers to refocus their offerings and to offer more valued services beyond the single content delivery.

(Fonte: Ciência da Informação, Brasília, v. 36, n. 1, p. 158-166, jan./abr. 2007.)

In “…and mainly its wider and free of charge dissemination.”, the expression free of charge dissemination is equivalent to:

Baseado no texto Understanding University Library Users' Mistreatment of Books, responda às questões de 76 a 85.

TEXTO: Understanding University Library Users' Mistreatment of Books Carmen Pérez, Manuel Cuadrado and Amparo Cervera University of Valencia, Spain Available online 20 February 2009. Abstract This paper analyses university library users' attitudes towards book vandalism in order to develop a basis for intervention. Using a customer oriented approach data was collected from users who attended an academic library exhibition on vandalized books at a University campus. Respondants were asked both for their reactions to the vandalism as well as to suggest measures to solve this problem. Punishment and surveillance were most frequently mentioned as preventative measures although users also recognized the utility of the exhibition in increasing awareness of book mutilation. Further implications of social marketing for libraries are also discussed. Article Outline Introduction Book Mistreatment Empirical Research. Objectives and Methodology Results User's Opinions on Book Mutilation User's Features User's Solution to Prevent Book Mutilation Conclusion Acknowledgements Appendix A. Supplementary data References Supplementary material. Table 1. Measures Taken to Prevent Library Book Mutilation Source: Burrows and Cooper (1992). Table 2. Sample Features (n = 230) Table 3. Results Related Mistreated Books Table 4. Mistreatment According to Gender and Chi-Squared Test Table 5. Mistreatment According to Studies Table 6. Opinions About Mistreated Books According to Occupation Table 7. Proposed Solutions for Preventing Book Mistreatment http://www.sciencedirect.com/%3Csup%3E%3Cimg src=Supplementary data associated with article can be found in the full-text version on ScienceDirect. http://www.sciencedirect.com/%3Csup%3E%3Cimg src=Corresponding author