Foram encontradas 80 questões.
Com base na Resolução nº 4, de 2 de outubro de 2009, que institui as Diretrizes Operacionais para o Atendimento Educacional Especializado na Educação Básica, assinale a alternativa que não apresenta uma atribuição do professor do Atendimento Educacional Especializado (AEE).
Provas
Na edição de 2011 do ENADE de Pedagogia, foi proposta a seguinte questão:
No que se refere à aprendizagem inicial da língua portuguesa, alfabetização e letramento são processos independentes.
PORQUE
A alfabetização é o desenvolvimento de competências e habilidades para o uso efetivo da língua portuguesa em práticas sociais, enquanto o letramento é a aprendizagem do sistema de utilização das letras, na escrita.
Acerca dessas asserções, assinale a opção correta.
A - As duas asserções são proposições verdadeiras, e a segunda é uma justificativa correta da primeira.
B - As duas asserções são proposições verdadeiras, mas a segunda não é uma justificativa correta da primeira.
C - A primeira asserção é uma proposição verdadeira, e a segunda, uma proposição falsa.
D - A primeira asserção é uma proposição falsa, e a segunda, uma proposição verdadeira.
E - Tanto a primeira quanto a segunda asserções são proposições falsas.
A questão acima teve como objetivo avaliar:
Provas
Associe as duas colunas, considerando as finalidades e aplicações dos seguintes levantamentos estatísticos e avaliativos, coordenados pelo INEP, Instituto Nacional de Estudos e Pesquisas Educacionais Anísio Teixeira:
| 1. Censo Escolar |
( ) pesquisa bienal por amostragem que, coleta dados sobre a qualidade da educação brasileira por regiões, redes de ensino pública e privada nos estados e no Distrito Federal. |
| 2. Censo Superior |
( ) avalia o ensino, a pesquisa, a extensão, a responsabilidade social, o desempenho dos alunos, a gestão da instituição, o corpo docente e infraestrutura, possibilitando traçar um panorama da qualidade dos cursos e instituições de educação superior no País. |
|
3. SINAES (Sistema Nacional da Educação Superior) |
( ) coleta de dados sobre a educação superior, com o objetivo de oferecer informações detalhadas sobre a situação atual e as grandes tendências do setor, tanto à comunidade acadêmica quanto à sociedade em geral. |
|
4. SAEB (Sistema Nacional da Educação Básica) |
( ) avalia o desempenho do estudante ao fim da educação básica, buscando contribuir para a melhoria da qualidade desse nível de escolaridade, além de ser utilizado também como mecanismo de seleção para o ingresso no ensino superior. |
| 5. ENEM (Sistema Nacional do Ensino Médio) |
( ) coleta dados sobre estabelecimentos, matrículas, funções docentes, movimento e rendimento escolar para subsidiar a execução de programas como merenda e transporte escolar, distribuição de livros e uniformes, implantação de bibliotecas, instalação de energia elétrica, entre outros. |
A sequência correta dessa associação é:
Provas
- LegislaçãoLei 9.394/1996: Lei de Diretrizes e Bases da Educação Nacional
- Temas Educacionais Pedagógicos
Vagner interrompeu os estudos quando tinha 15 anos, pouco antes de concluir o ensino fundamental. Aos 16 começou a trabalhar para compor a renda familiar, junto com a mãe e outros três irmãos. Mesmo sem frequentar a escola, Vagner sempre se interessou em ler e estudar por conta própria. Hoje, aos 19 anos, ele está pensando em prestar um exame de certificação de seus conhecimentos básicos. Considerando o que prevê a legislação brasileira atual e os programas de certificação promovidos pelo governo federal, esse jovem:
Provas
Read the text and answer question.
Lawsuits claim Knoedler made huge profits on fakes For more than a dozen years the Upper East Side gallery Knoedler & Company was “substantially dependent” on profits it made from selling a mysterious collection of artwork that is at the center of a federal forgery investigation, former clients of this former gallery have charged in court papers.
The analysis is based on financial records turned over as part of a lawsuit against the gallery filed by Domenico and Eleanore De Sole, who in 2004 paid $8.3 million for a painting attributed to Mark Rothko that they now say is a worthless fake.
The Rothko is one of approximately 40 works that Knoedler, which closed last year, obtained from Glafira Rosales, a littleknown dealer whose collection of works attributed to Modernist masters has no documented provenance and is the subject of an F.B.I. investigation.
Between 1996 and 2008, the suit asserts, Knoedler earned approximately $60 million from works that Ms. Rosales provided on consignment or sold outright to the gallery and cleared $40 million in profits. In one year, 2002, for example, the complaint says the gallery’s entire profit — $5.6 million — was derived from the sale of Ms. Rosales’s works.
“Knoedler’s viability as a business was substantially — and, in some years, almost entirely — dependent on sales from the Rosales Collection,” the De Soles claimed last month in an amended version of the suit they filed this year.
While the forgery allegations are well known and have been the subject of three federal lawsuits against Knoedler, the recent filings expand the known number of Rosales artworks that were handled by the gallery, which was in business for 165 years, and assert that they played a pivotal role in the gallery’s success. After the F.B.I. issued subpoenas to the gallery in the fall of 2009, Michael Hammer, Knoedler’s owner, halted the sale of any Rosales works. Knoedler ended up losing money that year and in 2010, the court papers say.
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/10/22/arts/design/knoedler-made-huge-profits-on-fake-rothkolawsuit- claims.html?hpw&_r=0
In the passage “The analysis is based on financial records turned over as part of a lawsuit against the gallery filed by Domenico and Eleanore De Sole” the meaning of the phrasal verb is
Provas
Read the text and answer question.
Lawsuits claim Knoedler made huge profits on fakes For more than a dozen years the Upper East Side gallery Knoedler & Company was “substantially dependent” on profits it made from selling a mysterious collection of artwork that is at the center of a federal forgery investigation, former clients of this former gallery have charged in court papers.
The analysis is based on financial records turned over as part of a lawsuit against the gallery filed by Domenico and Eleanore De Sole, who in 2004 paid $8.3 million for a painting attributed to Mark Rothko that they now say is a worthless fake.
The Rothko is one of approximately 40 works that Knoedler, which closed last year, obtained from Glafira Rosales, a littleknown dealer whose collection of works attributed to Modernist masters has no documented provenance and is the subject of an F.B.I. investigation.
Between 1996 and 2008, the suit asserts, Knoedler earned approximately $60 million from works that Ms. Rosales provided on consignment or sold outright to the gallery and cleared $40 million in profits. In one year, 2002, for example, the complaint says the gallery’s entire profit — $5.6 million — was derived from the sale of Ms. Rosales’s works.
“Knoedler’s viability as a business was substantially — and, in some years, almost entirely — dependent on sales from the Rosales Collection,” the De Soles claimed last month in an amended version of the suit they filed this year.
While the forgery allegations are well known and have been the subject of three federal lawsuits against Knoedler, the recent filings expand the known number of Rosales artworks that were handled by the gallery, which was in business for 165 years, and assert that they played a pivotal role in the gallery’s success. After the F.B.I. issued subpoenas to the gallery in the fall of 2009, Michael Hammer, Knoedler’s owner, halted the sale of any Rosales works. Knoedler ended up losing money that year and in 2010, the court papers say.
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/10/22/arts/design/knoedler-made-huge-profits-on-fake-rothkolawsuit- claims.html?hpw&_r=0
The alternative that brings the best synonym to the bold underline idiom in the passage “Knoedler ended up losing money that year and in 2010” is
Provas
Read the text and answer question.
Lawsuits claim Knoedler made huge profits on fakes For more than a dozen years the Upper East Side gallery Knoedler & Company was “substantially dependent” on profits it made from selling a mysterious collection of artwork that is at the center of a federal forgery investigation, former clients of this former gallery have charged in court papers.
The analysis is based on financial records turned over as part of a lawsuit against the gallery filed by Domenico and Eleanore De Sole, who in 2004 paid $8.3 million for a painting attributed to Mark Rothko that they now say is a worthless fake.
The Rothko is one of approximately 40 works that Knoedler, which closed last year, obtained from Glafira Rosales, a littleknown dealer whose collection of works attributed to Modernist masters has no documented provenance and is the subject of an F.B.I. investigation.
Between 1996 and 2008, the suit asserts, Knoedler earned approximately $60 million from works that Ms. Rosales provided on consignment or sold outright to the gallery and cleared $40 million in profits. In one year, 2002, for example, the complaint says the gallery’s entire profit — $5.6 million — was derived from the sale of Ms. Rosales’s works.
“Knoedler’s viability as a business was substantially — and, in some years, almost entirely — dependent on sales from the Rosales Collection,” the De Soles claimed last month in an amended version of the suit they filed this year.
While the forgery allegations are well known and have been the subject of three federal lawsuits against Knoedler, the recent filings expand the known number of Rosales artworks that were handled by the gallery, which was in business for 165 years, and assert that they played a pivotal role in the gallery’s success. After the F.B.I. issued subpoenas to the gallery in the fall of 2009, Michael Hammer, Knoedler’s owner, halted the sale of any Rosales works. Knoedler ended up losing money that year and in 2010, the court papers say.
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/10/22/arts/design/knoedler-made-huge-profits-on-fake-rothkolawsuit- claims.html?hpw&_r=0
Read the following passages:
The analysis is based on financial records turned over as part of a lawsuit against the gallery filed by Domenico and Eleanore De Sole, who in 2004 paid $8.3 million for a painting attributed to Mark Rothko that they now say is a worthless fake.
The Rothko is one of approximately 40 works that Knoedler, which closed last year, obtained from Glafira Rosales, a littleknown dealer whose collection of works attributed to Modernist masters has no documented provenance and is the subject of an F.B.I. investigation.
The underlined bold words are
Provas
Read the text and answer question.
Lawsuits claim Knoedler made huge profits on fakes For more than a dozen years the Upper East Side gallery Knoedler & Company was “substantially dependent” on profits it made from selling a mysterious collection of artwork that is at the center of a federal forgery investigation, former clients of this former gallery have charged in court papers.
The analysis is based on financial records turned over as part of a lawsuit against the gallery filed by Domenico and Eleanore De Sole, who in 2004 paid $8.3 million for a painting attributed to Mark Rothko that they now say is a worthless fake.
The Rothko is one of approximately 40 works that Knoedler, which closed last year, obtained from Glafira Rosales, a littleknown dealer whose collection of works attributed to Modernist masters has no documented provenance and is the subject of an F.B.I. investigation.
Between 1996 and 2008, the suit asserts, Knoedler earned approximately $60 million from works that Ms. Rosales provided on consignment or sold outright to the gallery and cleared $40 million in profits. In one year, 2002, for example, the complaint says the gallery’s entire profit — $5.6 million — was derived from the sale of Ms. Rosales’s works.
“Knoedler’s viability as a business was substantially — and, in some years, almost entirely — dependent on sales from the Rosales Collection,” the De Soles claimed last month in an amended version of the suit they filed this year.
While the forgery allegations are well known and have been the subject of three federal lawsuits against Knoedler, the recent filings expand the known number of Rosales artworks that were handled by the gallery, which was in business for 165 years, and assert that they played a pivotal role in the gallery’s success. After the F.B.I. issued subpoenas to the gallery in the fall of 2009, Michael Hammer, Knoedler’s owner, halted the sale of any Rosales works. Knoedler ended up losing money that year and in 2010, the court papers say.
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/10/22/arts/design/knoedler-made-huge-profits-on-fake-rothkolawsuit- claims.html?hpw&_r=0
According to the text, it’s not correct to say that
Provas
Read the text and answer question.
Lawsuits claim Knoedler made huge profits on fakes For more than a dozen years the Upper East Side gallery Knoedler & Company was “substantially dependent” on profits it made from selling a mysterious collection of artwork that is at the center of a federal forgery investigation, former clients of this former gallery have charged in court papers.
The analysis is based on financial records turned over as part of a lawsuit against the gallery filed by Domenico and Eleanore De Sole, who in 2004 paid $8.3 million for a painting attributed to Mark Rothko that they now say is a worthless fake.
The Rothko is one of approximately 40 works that Knoedler, which closed last year, obtained from Glafira Rosales, a littleknown dealer whose collection of works attributed to Modernist masters has no documented provenance and is the subject of an F.B.I. investigation.
Between 1996 and 2008, the suit asserts, Knoedler earned approximately $60 million from works that Ms. Rosales provided on consignment or sold outright to the gallery and cleared $40 million in profits. In one year, 2002, for example, the complaint says the gallery’s entire profit — $5.6 million — was derived from the sale of Ms. Rosales’s works.
“Knoedler’s viability as a business was substantially — and, in some years, almost entirely — dependent on sales from the Rosales Collection,” the De Soles claimed last month in an amended version of the suit they filed this year.
While the forgery allegations are well known and have been the subject of three federal lawsuits against Knoedler, the recent filings expand the known number of Rosales artworks that were handled by the gallery, which was in business for 165 years, and assert that they played a pivotal role in the gallery’s success. After the F.B.I. issued subpoenas to the gallery in the fall of 2009, Michael Hammer, Knoedler’s owner, halted the sale of any Rosales works. Knoedler ended up losing money that year and in 2010, the court papers say.
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/10/22/arts/design/knoedler-made-huge-profits-on-fake-rothkolawsuit- claims.html?hpw&_r=0
The suing against Knoedler & Company gallery was established by
Provas
Read the text and answer question.
Lawsuits claim Knoedler made huge profits on fakes For more than a dozen years the Upper East Side gallery Knoedler & Company was “substantially dependent” on profits it made from selling a mysterious collection of artwork that is at the center of a federal forgery investigation, former clients of this former gallery have charged in court papers.
The analysis is based on financial records turned over as part of a lawsuit against the gallery filed by Domenico and Eleanore De Sole, who in 2004 paid $8.3 million for a painting attributed to Mark Rothko that they now say is a worthless fake.
The Rothko is one of approximately 40 works that Knoedler, which closed last year, obtained from Glafira Rosales, a littleknown dealer whose collection of works attributed to Modernist masters has no documented provenance and is the subject of an F.B.I. investigation.
Between 1996 and 2008, the suit asserts, Knoedler earned approximately $60 million from works that Ms. Rosales provided on consignment or sold outright to the gallery and cleared $40 million in profits. In one year, 2002, for example, the complaint says the gallery’s entire profit — $5.6 million — was derived from the sale of Ms. Rosales’s works.
“Knoedler’s viability as a business was substantially — and, in some years, almost entirely — dependent on sales from the Rosales Collection,” the De Soles claimed last month in an amended version of the suit they filed this year.
While the forgery allegations are well known and have been the subject of three federal lawsuits against Knoedler, the recent filings expand the known number of Rosales artworks that were handled by the gallery, which was in business for 165 years, and assert that they played a pivotal role in the gallery’s success. After the F.B.I. issued subpoenas to the gallery in the fall of 2009, Michael Hammer, Knoedler’s owner, halted the sale of any Rosales works. Knoedler ended up losing money that year and in 2010, the court papers say.
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/10/22/arts/design/knoedler-made-huge-profits-on-fake-rothkolawsuit- claims.html?hpw&_r=0
The alternative that brings the most comprehensive idea about the text is
Provas
Caderno Container