Considere o seguinte conteúdo de um dockerfile.

FROM rhel7:latest
USER root

MAINTAINER Joao

RUN yum -y install deltarpm yum-utils --
disablerepo=*-eus-* --disablerepo=*-htb-* *-
sjis-*\

--disablerepo=*-ha-* --disablerepo=*-rt-* --
disablerepo=*-lb-* --disablerepo=*-rs-* --
disablerepo=*-sap-*

RUN yum-config-manager --disable *-eus-* *-htb-*
*-ha-* *-rt-* *-lb-* *-rs-* *-sap-* *-sjis* >
/dev/null

RUN yum install httpd procps-ng MySQL-python -y

ADD action /var/www/cgi-bin/action
RUN echo "PassEnv DB_SERVICE_SERVICE_HOST" >>
/etc/httpd/conf/httpd.conf
RUN chown root:apache /var/www/cgi-bin/action
RUN chmod 755 /var/www/cgi-bin/action
RUN echo "Pagina Inicial" >
/var/www/html/index.html
EXPOSE 80

CMD mkdir /run/httpd ; /usr/sbin/httpd -D
FOREGROUND

Tendo como referência essas informações, julgue o item a seguir.

O comando a seguir é capaz de fazer o build e iniciar a execução do container, respectivamente.

docker run -d -p 80:80 –name=Dockerfile

Considere o seguinte conteúdo de um dockerfile.

FROM rhel7:latest
USER root

MAINTAINER Joao

RUN yum -y install deltarpm yum-utils --
disablerepo=*-eus-* --disablerepo=*-htb-* *-
sjis-*\

--disablerepo=*-ha-* --disablerepo=*-rt-* --
disablerepo=*-lb-* --disablerepo=*-rs-* --
disablerepo=*-sap-*

RUN yum-config-manager --disable *-eus-* *-htb-*
*-ha-* *-rt-* *-lb-* *-rs-* *-sap-* *-sjis* >
/dev/null

RUN yum install httpd procps-ng MySQL-python -y

ADD action /var/www/cgi-bin/action
RUN echo "PassEnv DB_SERVICE_SERVICE_HOST" >>
/etc/httpd/conf/httpd.conf
RUN chown root:apache /var/www/cgi-bin/action
RUN chmod 755 /var/www/cgi-bin/action
RUN echo "Pagina Inicial" >
/var/www/html/index.html
EXPOSE 80

CMD mkdir /run/httpd ; /usr/sbin/httpd -D
FOREGROUND

Tendo como referência essas informações, julgue o item a seguir.

A imagem base do container é um Red Hat Linux.

Julgue o item a seguir, relativos a raciocínio lógico.

A negação da afirmação “Todos os amigos de Bianca são naturais de São Paulo” é: “Nenhum amigo de Bianca é natural de São Paulo”.

Julgue o item a seguir, relativos a raciocínio lógico.

Suponha que seja válida a seguinte proposição:

P: Se Aldo não tem um número de CPF, então ele não pode viajar nem pode abrir uma empresa.

Nessa situação, se Aldo pode abrir uma empresa, então ele já obteve o seu número de CPF.

The pandemic has exposed a contradiction in modern society. We are more connected than ever – proven by the speed and truly global spread of the virus; nevertheless, we are also deeply divided.

Today’s connectedness, enforced by social distancing, has pushed the role of technology in every aspect of our lives to a new level. The tech industry is now in a challenging space: trapped between the increasing politicization of technology, the still superficial social debate around its impact and the slow adaptation of appropriate legislation. Right now, the industry needs to enable and push forward this ethical debate, recognizing its responsibility in this historic moment.

The first step is to end the myth of tech neutrality. We need to acknowledge that technology is caught between private economic interests and its social value. Some tech business models, for example, prioritize commodification of data or advertising revenue over the social value of their services — the sharing of knowledge, connecting people, etc.

The social impact of tech is deeper than we usually perceive and most of the time invisible to us. Digital architecture determines, increasingly, social interactions in our digital society. An example of this is the invisible influence of search engine and social media algorithms, the results of which shape our understanding of the world.

In this moment of crisis, technology can play a fundamental role in overcoming the economic recession and reducing the systemic injustices that have been exposed. Social exclusion - the next pandemic.

Internet: <www.thoughtworks.com> (adapted).

Concerning the ideas stated in the text and the words used in it, judge the following item.

According to the text, even when we do not notice, the mechanisms that organize the digital society shape the way people relate online.

The pandemic has exposed a contradiction in modern society. We are more connected than ever – proven by the speed and truly global spread of the virus; nevertheless, we are also deeply divided.

Today’s connectedness, enforced by social distancing, has pushed the role of technology in every aspect of our lives to a new level. The tech industry is now in a challenging space: trapped between the increasing politicization of technology, the still superficial social debate around its impact and the slow adaptation of appropriate legislation. Right now, the industry needs to enable and push forward this ethical debate, recognizing its responsibility in this historic moment.

The first step is to end the myth of tech neutrality. We need to acknowledge that technology is caught between private economic interests and its social value. Some tech business models, for example, prioritize commodification of data or advertising revenue over the social value of their services — the sharing of knowledge, connecting people, etc.

The social impact of tech is deeper than we usually perceive and most of the time invisible to us. Digital architecture determines, increasingly, social interactions in our digital society. An example of this is the invisible influence of search engine and social media algorithms, the results of which shape our understanding of the world.

In this moment of crisis, technology can play a fundamental role in overcoming the economic recession and reducing the systemic injustices that have been exposed. Social exclusion - the next pandemic.

Internet: <www.thoughtworks.com> (adapted).

Concerning the ideas stated in the text and the words used in it, judge the following item.

The words “trapped” (in the second sentence of the second paragraph) and “caught” (in the second sentence of the third paragraph) can be considered synonyms and are used with similar meanings in the text.

The pandemic has exposed a contradiction in modern society. We are more connected than ever – proven by the speed and truly global spread of the virus; nevertheless, we are also deeply divided.

Today’s connectedness, enforced by social distancing, has pushed the role of technology in every aspect of our lives to a new level. The tech industry is now in a challenging space: trapped between the increasing politicization of technology, the still superficial social debate around its impact and the slow adaptation of appropriate legislation. Right now, the industry needs to enable and push forward this ethical debate, recognizing its responsibility in this historic moment.

The first step is to end the myth of tech neutrality. We need to acknowledge that technology is caught between private economic interests and its social value. Some tech business models, for example, prioritize commodification of data or advertising revenue over the social value of their services — the sharing of knowledge, connecting people, etc.

The social impact of tech is deeper than we usually perceive and most of the time invisible to us. Digital architecture determines, increasingly, social interactions in our digital society. An example of this is the invisible influence of search engine and social media algorithms, the results of which shape our understanding of the world.

In this moment of crisis, technology can play a fundamental role in overcoming the economic recession and reducing the systemic injustices that have been exposed. Social exclusion - the next pandemic.

Internet: <www.thoughtworks.com> (adapted).

Concerning the ideas stated in the text and the words used in it, judge the following item.

Understanding that digital technology does not play an impartial role in the tense dynamics between private and social spheres is an important stage in the debate in the text.

The pandemic has exposed a contradiction in modern society. We are more connected than ever – proven by the speed and truly global spread of the virus; nevertheless, we are also deeply divided.

Today’s connectedness, enforced by social distancing, has pushed the role of technology in every aspect of our lives to a new level. The tech industry is now in a challenging space: trapped between the increasing politicization of technology, the still superficial social debate around its impact and the slow adaptation of appropriate legislation. Right now, the industry needs to enable and push forward this ethical debate, recognizing its responsibility in this historic moment.

The first step is to end the myth of tech neutrality. We need to acknowledge that technology is caught between private economic interests and its social value. Some tech business models, for example, prioritize commodification of data or advertising revenue over the social value of their services — the sharing of knowledge, connecting people, etc.

The social impact of tech is deeper than we usually perceive and most of the time invisible to us. Digital architecture determines, increasingly, social interactions in our digital society. An example of this is the invisible influence of search engine and social media algorithms, the results of which shape our understanding of the world.

In this moment of crisis, technology can play a fundamental role in overcoming the economic recession and reducing the systemic injustices that have been exposed. Social exclusion - the next pandemic.

Internet: <www.thoughtworks.com> (adapted).

Concerning the ideas stated in the text and the words used in it, judge the following item.

The sentence “the industry needs to enable and push forward this ethical debate” (in the last sentence of the second paragraph) can be correctly rephrased as the industry ought to facilitate and advance forward this ethical debate, without changing the meaning of the text.

The pandemic has exposed a contradiction in modern society. We are more connected than ever – proven by the speed and truly global spread of the virus; nevertheless, we are also deeply divided.

Today’s connectedness, enforced by social distancing, has pushed the role of technology in every aspect of our lives to a new level. The tech industry is now in a challenging space: trapped between the increasing politicization of technology, the still superficial social debate around its impact and the slow adaptation of appropriate legislation. Right now, the industry needs to enable and push forward this ethical debate, recognizing its responsibility in this historic moment.

The first step is to end the myth of tech neutrality. We need to acknowledge that technology is caught between private economic interests and its social value. Some tech business models, for example, prioritize commodification of data or advertising revenue over the social value of their services — the sharing of knowledge, connecting people, etc.

The social impact of tech is deeper than we usually perceive and most of the time invisible to us. Digital architecture determines, increasingly, social interactions in our digital society. An example of this is the invisible influence of search engine and social media algorithms, the results of which shape our understanding of the world.

In this moment of crisis, technology can play a fundamental role in overcoming the economic recession and reducing the systemic injustices that have been exposed. Social exclusion - the next pandemic.

Internet: <www.thoughtworks.com> (adapted).

Concerning the ideas stated in the text and the words used in it, judge the following item.

The word “nevertheless” introduces an idea of condition in the first paragraph.

Texto CB1A1-I

Não estamos opondo máquinas a ecologia, como se as máquinas fossem aquelas coisas que só servem para violentar a Mãe Natureza e violar a harmonia entre o ser humano e a natureza ― uma imagem atribuída à tecnologia desde o fim do século XVIII. Também não estamos seguindo a hipótese de Gaia de que a Terra é um único superorganismo ou uma coletividade de organismos. Em vez disso, gostaria de propor uma reflexão sobre a ecologia das máquinas. Para dar início a essa ecologia das máquinas, precisamos primeiro voltar ao conceito de ecologia. Seu fundamento está na diversidade, já que é apenas com biodiversidade (ou multiespécies que incluam todas as formas de organismos, até mesmo bactérias) que os sistemas ecológicos podem ser conceitualizados. A fim de discutir uma ecologia de máquinas, precisaremos de uma noção diferente e em paralelo com a de biodiversidade ― uma noção a que chamamos tecnodiversidade. A biodiversidade é o correlato da tecnodiversidade, uma vez que sem esta só testemunharemos o desaparecimento de espécies diante de uma racionalidade homogênea. Tomemos como exemplo os pesticidas, que são feitos para matar certa espécie de insetos independentemente de sua localização geográfica, precisamente porque são baseados em análises químicas e biológicas. Sabemos, no entanto, que o uso de um mesmo pesticida pode levar a diversas consequências desastrosas em biomas diferentes. Antes da invenção dessas substâncias, empregavam-se diferentes técnicas para combater os insetos que ameaçavam as colheitas dos produtos agrícolas ― recursos naturais encontrados na região, por exemplo. Ou seja, havia uma tecnodiversidade antes do emprego de pesticidas como solução universal. Os pesticidas aparentam ser mais eficientes a curto prazo, mas hoje é fato bastante consolidado que estávamos o tempo todo olhando para os nossos pés quando pensávamos em um futuro longínquo. Podemos dizer que a tecnodiversidade é, em essência, uma questão de localidade. Localidade não significa necessariamente etnocentrismo ou nacionalismo, mas é aquilo que nos força a repensar o processo de modernização e de globalização e que nos permite refletir sobre a possibilidade de reposicionar as tecnologias modernas.

Yuk Hui. Tecnodiversidade. São Paulo: Ubu Editora, 2020, p. 122-123 (com adaptações).

Ainda com relação aos sentidos e aos aspectos linguísticos do texto CB1A1-I, julgue o item a seguir.

No trecho “Localidade não significa necessariamente etnocentrismo ou nacionalismo, mas é aquilo que nos força a repensar o processo de modernização”, a forma verbal “é” concorda com o termo “Localidade”.