Text 1

Chapecó is a municipality in the state of Santa Catarina, in the Southern Region of Brazil. Being a major industrial, financial and educational center, it is a major producer of industrialized food products. Considered a medium city, with a population estimated at 224,013 inhabitants, it is among the four most important cities in the state. It belongs to the Meso-region of Western Santa Catarina and to the Microregion of Chapecó.

Distant 550 km.......................the state capital, Florianópolis, it is Headquarters of the Metropolitan Region.......................Chapecó, and exerts significant influence not....................... in the Catarinense West but.......................in the Northwest Rio Grande do Sul and Southwest of Paraná, from an economic, cultural, or political point of view.

Chapecó became known worldwide through its association football club Chapecoense and the aftermath of LaMia Flight 2933 which killed 71, including most of the team’s roster and staff.

With the titles of “Brazil’s agribusiness capital” and “Brazil’s business tourism capital”, the planned town constructed in the form of a chess grid also has universities attracting students from all over Brazil. The main educational institutions are UFFS, UCEFF, UNOCHAPECÓ, UNOESC and UDESC.

This region of the state is home of some of the largest meat processing and exporting industrial enterprises such as Sadia and Seara Foods; the farmers are organized in agricultural cooperatives. Chapecó is known as a Brazilian agro-industrial capital, specialized in pork, poultry and technology involved. The city is headquarters of Aurora Central Cooperative Archived 2016-11-23 at the Wayback Machine and has a plant of BRF S.A. since 1973.

Other major economic sectors are metal mechanics specialized in equipment for slaughterhouses and transportation, plastics and packaging, furniture, beverages, software development and biotechnology. Civil construction and trade are also important source of income.

source: https://en.wikipedia.org

    In the United Kingdom (UK), cyberattacks continue to have serious consequences for government organisations, public services and people’s lives, undermining the value for money of government expenditure in affected services and systems. 

    The cyber threat to the government is severe and advancing quickly. In response, the Cabinet Office has published and started leading work to implement the first cyber strategy for government. 

    However, progress is slow and cyber incidents with a significant impact on government and public services are likely to happen regularly, not least because of the growing cyber threat. The government’s cyber resilience levels are lower than it previously estimated. The resilience of the hundreds of ageing legacy IT systems that departments still use is likely to be worse. 

    To avoid serious incidents, build resilience and protect the value for money of its operations, government must catch up with the acute cyber threat it faces. The government will continue to find it difficult to do so until it successfully addresses the longstanding shortage of cyber skills, strengthens accountability for cyber risk, and better manages the risks posed by legacy IT. 

Internet: < nao.org.uk> (adapted).

    In the United Kingdom (UK), cyberattacks continue to have serious consequences for government organisations, public services and people’s lives, undermining the value for money of government expenditure in affected services and systems. 

    The cyber threat to the government is severe and advancing quickly. In response, the Cabinet Office has published and started leading work to implement the first cyber strategy for government. 

    However, progress is slow and cyber incidents with a significant impact on government and public services are likely to happen regularly, not least because of the growing cyber threat. The government’s cyber resilience levels are lower than it previously estimated. The resilience of the hundreds of ageing legacy IT systems that departments still use is likely to be worse. 

    To avoid serious incidents, build resilience and protect the value for money of its operations, government must catch up with the acute cyber threat it faces. The government will continue to find it difficult to do so until it successfully addresses the longstanding shortage of cyber skills, strengthens accountability for cyber risk, and better manages the risks posed by legacy IT. 

Internet: < nao.org.uk> (adapted).

    In the United Kingdom (UK), cyberattacks continue to have serious consequences for government organisations, public services and people’s lives, undermining the value for money of government expenditure in affected services and systems. 

    The cyber threat to the government is severe and advancing quickly. In response, the Cabinet Office has published and started leading work to implement the first cyber strategy for government. 

    However, progress is slow and cyber incidents with a significant impact on government and public services are likely to happen regularly, not least because of the growing cyber threat. The government’s cyber resilience levels are lower than it previously estimated. The resilience of the hundreds of ageing legacy IT systems that departments still use is likely to be worse. 

    To avoid serious incidents, build resilience and protect the value for money of its operations, government must catch up with the acute cyber threat it faces. The government will continue to find it difficult to do so until it successfully addresses the longstanding shortage of cyber skills, strengthens accountability for cyber risk, and better manages the risks posed by legacy IT. 

Internet: < nao.org.uk> (adapted).

    In the United Kingdom (UK), cyberattacks continue to have serious consequences for government organisations, public services and people’s lives, undermining the value for money of government expenditure in affected services and systems. 

    The cyber threat to the government is severe and advancing quickly. In response, the Cabinet Office has published and started leading work to implement the first cyber strategy for government. 

    However, progress is slow and cyber incidents with a significant impact on government and public services are likely to happen regularly, not least because of the growing cyber threat. The government’s cyber resilience levels are lower than it previously estimated. The resilience of the hundreds of ageing legacy IT systems that departments still use is likely to be worse. 

    To avoid serious incidents, build resilience and protect the value for money of its operations, government must catch up with the acute cyber threat it faces. The government will continue to find it difficult to do so until it successfully addresses the longstanding shortage of cyber skills, strengthens accountability for cyber risk, and better manages the risks posed by legacy IT. 

Internet: < nao.org.uk> (adapted).

    In the United Kingdom (UK), cyberattacks continue to have serious consequences for government organisations, public services and people’s lives, undermining the value for money of government expenditure in affected services and systems. 

    The cyber threat to the government is severe and advancing quickly. In response, the Cabinet Office has published and started leading work to implement the first cyber strategy for government. 

    However, progress is slow and cyber incidents with a significant impact on government and public services are likely to happen regularly, not least because of the growing cyber threat. The government’s cyber resilience levels are lower than it previously estimated. The resilience of the hundreds of ageing legacy IT systems that departments still use is likely to be worse. 

    To avoid serious incidents, build resilience and protect the value for money of its operations, government must catch up with the acute cyber threat it faces. The government will continue to find it difficult to do so until it successfully addresses the longstanding shortage of cyber skills, strengthens accountability for cyber risk, and better manages the risks posed by legacy IT. 

Internet: < nao.org.uk> (adapted).

    Artificial intelligence (AI) chatbots have emerged as a growing resource in educational settings. This expansion has occurred amid varying acceptance and trust in digital learning technologies across student populations, with most reporting that their instructors or schools had not yet provided guidelines for ethical or responsible AI tool use.  

    Benefits of AI chatbots in educational settings extend to both students and educators. These systems can support learning by providing detailed explanations of concepts through intelligent tutoring support. Beyond explanations, they can offer immediate feedback on students’ work, allowing for more rapid improvement and iterative learning. These systems have demonstrated their potential to support personalized learning, adapting to individual student needs. Personalization naturally fosters higher levels of student engagement, found to be another benefit of these systems. Studies have also highlighted AI’s potential to stimulate creativity through idea generation, bridge language barriers via content translation for multilingual learners, and democratize education by providing continuous access to educational support and resources regardless of time or geographical constraints. 

    Besides their promise, implementing AI chatbots in educational settings requires careful consideration of several risks. For students, academic integrity has been raised as a primary concern, with studies highlighting the risks of intentional and unintentional plagiarism. These tools may inadvertently undermine students’ critical thinking development and academic agency, potentially fostering an unhealthy overreliance on automated assistance. The quality of interaction itself presents additional challenges, as the reduction of peer-to-peer and student-instructor interactions threatens to eliminate meaningful learning relationships.

    Artificial intelligence (AI) chatbots have emerged as a growing resource in educational settings. This expansion has occurred amid varying acceptance and trust in digital learning technologies across student populations, with most reporting that their instructors or schools had not yet provided guidelines for ethical or responsible AI tool use.  

    Benefits of AI chatbots in educational settings extend to both students and educators. These systems can support learning by providing detailed explanations of concepts through intelligent tutoring support. Beyond explanations, they can offer immediate feedback on students’ work, allowing for more rapid improvement and iterative learning. These systems have demonstrated their potential to support personalized learning, adapting to individual student needs. Personalization naturally fosters higher levels of student engagement, found to be another benefit of these systems. Studies have also highlighted AI’s potential to stimulate creativity through idea generation, bridge language barriers via content translation for multilingual learners, and democratize education by providing continuous access to educational support and resources regardless of time or geographical constraints. 

    Besides their promise, implementing AI chatbots in educational settings requires careful consideration of several risks. For students, academic integrity has been raised as a primary concern, with studies highlighting the risks of intentional and unintentional plagiarism. These tools may inadvertently undermine students’ critical thinking development and academic agency, potentially fostering an unhealthy overreliance on automated assistance. The quality of interaction itself presents additional challenges, as the reduction of peer-to-peer and student-instructor interactions threatens to eliminate meaningful learning relationships.

    Artificial intelligence (AI) chatbots have emerged as a growing resource in educational settings. This expansion has occurred amid varying acceptance and trust in digital learning technologies across student populations, with most reporting that their instructors or schools had not yet provided guidelines for ethical or responsible AI tool use.  

    Benefits of AI chatbots in educational settings extend to both students and educators. These systems can support learning by providing detailed explanations of concepts through intelligent tutoring support. Beyond explanations, they can offer immediate feedback on students’ work, allowing for more rapid improvement and iterative learning. These systems have demonstrated their potential to support personalized learning, adapting to individual student needs. Personalization naturally fosters higher levels of student engagement, found to be another benefit of these systems. Studies have also highlighted AI’s potential to stimulate creativity through idea generation, bridge language barriers via content translation for multilingual learners, and democratize education by providing continuous access to educational support and resources regardless of time or geographical constraints. 

    Besides their promise, implementing AI chatbots in educational settings requires careful consideration of several risks. For students, academic integrity has been raised as a primary concern, with studies highlighting the risks of intentional and unintentional plagiarism. These tools may inadvertently undermine students’ critical thinking development and academic agency, potentially fostering an unhealthy overreliance on automated assistance. The quality of interaction itself presents additional challenges, as the reduction of peer-to-peer and student-instructor interactions threatens to eliminate meaningful learning relationships.

    Artificial intelligence (AI) chatbots have emerged as a growing resource in educational settings. This expansion has occurred amid varying acceptance and trust in digital learning technologies across student populations, with most reporting that their instructors or schools had not yet provided guidelines for ethical or responsible AI tool use.  

    Benefits of AI chatbots in educational settings extend to both students and educators. These systems can support learning by providing detailed explanations of concepts through intelligent tutoring support. Beyond explanations, they can offer immediate feedback on students’ work, allowing for more rapid improvement and iterative learning. These systems have demonstrated their potential to support personalized learning, adapting to individual student needs. Personalization naturally fosters higher levels of student engagement, found to be another benefit of these systems. Studies have also highlighted AI’s potential to stimulate creativity through idea generation, bridge language barriers via content translation for multilingual learners, and democratize education by providing continuous access to educational support and resources regardless of time or geographical constraints. 

    Besides their promise, implementing AI chatbots in educational settings requires careful consideration of several risks. For students, academic integrity has been raised as a primary concern, with studies highlighting the risks of intentional and unintentional plagiarism. These tools may inadvertently undermine students’ critical thinking development and academic agency, potentially fostering an unhealthy overreliance on automated assistance. The quality of interaction itself presents additional challenges, as the reduction of peer-to-peer and student-instructor interactions threatens to eliminate meaningful learning relationships.