Magna Concursos

Foram encontradas 50 questões.

3268484 Ano: 2013
Disciplina: Biologia
Banca: FEPESE
Orgão: EPAGRI-SC

O desenvolvimento da resistência de pragas aos agrotóxicos tem sido observado de forma cada vez mais frequente na fruticultura de clima temperado.

A respeito deste assunto, é correto afirmar:

 

Provas

Questão presente nas seguintes provas
3268483 Ano: 2013
Disciplina: Biologia
Banca: FEPESE
Orgão: EPAGRI-SC

A mosca sul-americana das frutas (Anastrepha fraterculus Wied., 1830) é uma praga-chave muito temida nos cultivos de frutíferas no Sul do Brasil, com destaque para todo território catarinense.

Atualmente, a mosca das frutas é uma praga chave das seguintes culturas:

 

Provas

Questão presente nas seguintes provas
3268482 Ano: 2013
Disciplina: Biologia
Banca: FEPESE
Orgão: EPAGRI-SC

O controle de pragas em pomares comerciais está elevando, cada vez mais, o custo de produção. Assim, devem ser envidados esforços no sentido de racionalizar ou até eliminar o uso de agrotóxicos para o controle das pragas em pomares. Uma das estratégias sugeridas para se obter um bom controle de pragas é o uso do controle biológico.

Em relação ao controle biológico, é correto afirmar:

 

Provas

Questão presente nas seguintes provas
3268481 Ano: 2013
Disciplina: Biologia
Banca: FEPESE
Orgão: EPAGRI-SC

A grande maioria das bananeiras cultivadas deriva de cruzamentos inter e intraespecíficos entre duas espécies diploides (2n = 2x = 22), Musa acuminata (AA) e Musa balbisiana (BB), as quais produzem frutos com sementes e não possuem valor comercial. As variedades comerciais triploides são partenocárpicas.

Estudos recentes baseados em abordagens genômicas revelaram que:

 

Provas

Questão presente nas seguintes provas
3268480 Ano: 2013
Disciplina: Biologia
Banca: FEPESE
Orgão: EPAGRI-SC

A produção de frutas, de maneira geral, é altamente dependente de uma boa polinização.

Em relação ao tema, é correto afirmar:

 

Provas

Questão presente nas seguintes provas
3268479 Ano: 2013
Disciplina: Biologia
Banca: FEPESE
Orgão: EPAGRI-SC

A respeito da fisiologia e do metabolismo pós-colheita de frutos climatéricos, é correto afirmar:

 

Provas

Questão presente nas seguintes provas
3268478 Ano: 2013
Disciplina: Biologia
Banca: FEPESE
Orgão: EPAGRI-SC

O Estado de Santa Catarina conquistou a sua primeira IG (Indicação Geográfica), espécie IP (Indicação de Procedência), no dia 14 de fevereiro de 2012, publicação nº 2145 da Revista de Propriedade Intelectual do INPI (Instituto Nacional de Propriedade Intelectual).

A IG Vales da Uva Goethe está relacionada com a produção e a vinificação da Uva Goethe no terroir do Sul Catarinense. Na busca por novos produtos agroalimentares com potencial para IG no Estado, instituições públicas (Sebrae-SC) têm realizado levantamentos e relacionaram 30 produtos Agroalimentares Catarinenses passíveis de obtenção de IG (Indicação Geográfica), signo que faz referência à origem e à qualidade.

Entre os 10 principais produtos agroalimentares selecionados, dois, um da Serra Catarinense e outro do Litoral do Estado, são originários da fruticultura.

Assinale a alternativa que indica corretamente os dois produtos da fruticultura catarinense sugeridos para novas IG (Indicação Geográfica).

 

Provas

Questão presente nas seguintes provas

Text

Thinking the unthinkable

Today, it seems that no one is uninformed about the environment. Every day the media shows us more evidence of climate change: extreme weather, melting icecaps, and rising seas. Most of us believe we can do something to prevent global disaster, such as recycling, or conserving energy.

It’s strange to recall that, before the 1960s, few people knew of the damage we were doing to the planet. However, one scientist had already realized the dangers ahead. And today, this same man believes it may be too late to save the world.

In the 1960s, Professor James Lovelock came up with one of the most famous theories on the environment – the GAIA hypothesis. According to this hypothesis, the earth’s atmosphere, soil, and oceans work in concert to provide an inhabitable environment for humans. If we disrupt these elements too severely, the earth may one day become uninhabitable.

In the decade before he developed the Gaia hypothesis, Lovelock had created a device to detect atmospheric chemicals. With this device, he discovered particular chemicals, called CFCs. Later, other scientists discovered that these CFCs had damaged the earth’s ozone layer. Before then, we hadn’t knows about the hole in the ozone layer.

By 1979, Lovelock had put forward his theories on the environment, in his first book. At that time, few people believe him. Before scientists such as Lovelock publicized environmental issues, the environment hadn’t been a very fashionable topic. In 2004, after many people had only just started to accept the reality of global warming, Lovelock became convinced that climate change was irreversible. In 2006, he wrote another book describing his latest ideas. In 40 years, Lovelock believes large parts of the world will be desert. We will need to make synthesized food to feed the world’s population.

‘Is Lovelock right this time too? Surely we can prevent this nightmare, if we all recycle, use renewable energy, and travel less by plane and car? Lovelock disagrees. According to him, it is now impossible to reverse global warming. We did not act quickly enough when we had the chance. Renewable energy and recycling are a case of too little, too late.

Ultimately, if the human race is to survive, Lovelock believes we need to use more technology, not less. In his view, only nuclear energy can provide sufficient power for the planet. Now over 90 years old, Lovelock may not live to find out if he is right. But we will…

In the sentence:

“By 1979, Lovelock had put forward his theories on the environment, in his first book.”

The word “his” is used twice. In both cases it refers to:

 

Provas

Questão presente nas seguintes provas

Text

Thinking the unthinkable

Today, it seems that no one is uninformed about the environment. Every day the media shows us more evidence of climate change: extreme weather, melting icecaps, and rising seas. Most of us believe we can do something to prevent global disaster, such as recycling, or conserving energy.

It’s strange to recall that, before the 1960s, few people knew of the damage we were doing to the planet. However, one scientist had already realized the dangers ahead. And today, this same man believes it may be too late to save the world.

In the 1960s, Professor James Lovelock came up with one of the most famous theories on the environment – the GAIA hypothesis. According to this hypothesis, the earth’s atmosphere, soil, and oceans work in concert to provide an inhabitable environment for humans. If we disrupt these elements too severely, the earth may one day become uninhabitable.

In the decade before he developed the Gaia hypothesis, Lovelock had created a device to detect atmospheric chemicals. With this device, he discovered particular chemicals, called CFCs. Later, other scientists discovered that these CFCs had damaged the earth’s ozone layer. Before then, we hadn’t knows about the hole in the ozone layer.

By 1979, Lovelock had put forward his theories on the environment, in his first book. At that time, few people believe him. Before scientists such as Lovelock publicized environmental issues, the environment hadn’t been a very fashionable topic. In 2004, after many people had only just started to accept the reality of global warming, Lovelock became convinced that climate change was irreversible. In 2006, he wrote another book describing his latest ideas. In 40 years, Lovelock believes large parts of the world will be desert. We will need to make synthesized food to feed the world’s population.

‘Is Lovelock right this time too? Surely we can prevent this nightmare, if we all recycle, use renewable energy, and travel less by plane and car? Lovelock disagrees. According to him, it is now impossible to reverse global warming. We did not act quickly enough when we had the chance. Renewable energy and recycling are a case of too little, too late.

Ultimately, if the human race is to survive, Lovelock believes we need to use more technology, not less. In his view, only nuclear energy can provide sufficient power for the planet. Now over 90 years old, Lovelock may not live to find out if he is right. But we will…

About Professor James Lovelock, it is correct to state that:

 

Provas

Questão presente nas seguintes provas

Text

Thinking the unthinkable

Today, it seems that no one is uninformed about the environment. Every day the media shows us more evidence of climate change: extreme weather, melting icecaps, and rising seas. Most of us believe we can do something to prevent global disaster, such as recycling, or conserving energy.

It’s strange to recall that, before the 1960s, few people knew of the damage we were doing to the planet. However, one scientist had already realized the dangers ahead. And today, this same man believes it may be too late to save the world.

In the 1960s, Professor James Lovelock came up with one of the most famous theories on the environment – the GAIA hypothesis. According to this hypothesis, the earth’s atmosphere, soil, and oceans work in concert to provide an inhabitable environment for humans. If we disrupt these elements too severely, the earth may one day become uninhabitable.

In the decade before he developed the Gaia hypothesis, Lovelock had created a device to detect atmospheric chemicals. With this device, he discovered particular chemicals, called CFCs. Later, other scientists discovered that these CFCs had damaged the earth’s ozone layer. Before then, we hadn’t knows about the hole in the ozone layer.

By 1979, Lovelock had put forward his theories on the environment, in his first book. At that time, few people believe him. Before scientists such as Lovelock publicized environmental issues, the environment hadn’t been a very fashionable topic. In 2004, after many people had only just started to accept the reality of global warming, Lovelock became convinced that climate change was irreversible. In 2006, he wrote another book describing his latest ideas. In 40 years, Lovelock believes large parts of the world will be desert. We will need to make synthesized food to feed the world’s population.

‘Is Lovelock right this time too? Surely we can prevent this nightmare, if we all recycle, use renewable energy, and travel less by plane and car? Lovelock disagrees. According to him, it is now impossible to reverse global warming. We did not act quickly enough when we had the chance. Renewable energy and recycling are a case of too little, too late.

Ultimately, if the human race is to survive, Lovelock believes we need to use more technology, not less. In his view, only nuclear energy can provide sufficient power for the planet. Now over 90 years old, Lovelock may not live to find out if he is right. But we will…

The words: However and ultimately, are being used in the text as:

 

Provas

Questão presente nas seguintes provas