Foram encontradas 50 questões.
Leia o trecho da canção “Alegria Alegria”, de Caetano Veloso.
[...] o sol se reparte em crimes
espaçonaves guerrilhas
em cardinales bonitas
eu vou
em caras de presidentes
em grandes beijos de amor
em dentes pernas bandeiras
bomba e brigitte bardot
o sol nas bancas de revistas
me enche de alegria e preguiça
quem lê tanta notícia
eu vou
ela pensa em casamento
e eu nunca mais fui à escola
sem lenço e sem documento
eu vou
eu tomo uma coca-cola
ela pensa em casamento
uma canção me consola
eu vou
por entre fotos e nomes
sem livros e sem fuzil
sem fome sem telefone
no coração do brasil [...]
(Heloísa B. de Hollanda e Marcos A. Gonçalves. Cultura e participação nos anos 60, 1987.)
Ao representar o período em que foi composta, essa canção de 1967 apresenta
Provas
Durante o governo Campos Salles (1898-1902) [...] foi adotada a “política dos governadores”. Sob essa orientação, os governos das províncias ganharam ampla autonomia.
(Isabel Lustosa. A História do Brasil explicada aos meus filhos, 2012.)
A política dos governadores implicou
Provas
Nessa primeira metade do século [XIX], as atividades urbanas haviam perdido qualquer vínculo com o tempo da natureza; de há muito se encontram subordinadas ao tempo abstrato, ao dia implacavelmente dividido em 24 horas.
(Maria Stella Martins Bresciani. Londres e Paris no século XIX: o espetáculo da pobreza, 1982.)
A mudança assinalada no excerto associa-se
Provas
Numa primeira aproximação, o sistema colonial apresenta- se-nos como o conjunto das relações entre as metrópoles e suas respectivas colônias, num dado período da história da colonização.
(Fernando A. Novais. Portugal e Brasil na crise do Antigo Sistema Colonial (1777-1808), 2019.)
O “conjunto das relações” mencionado no excerto abrangia
Provas
Como a maior parte das comunidades tradicionais africanas eram sociedades ágrafas, a palavra falada era uma das formas que homens e mulheres tinham de se conectar com o mundo divino e sobrenatural, era o elo entre o passado, o presente e o futuro.
(Ynaê Lopes dos Santos. História da África e do Brasil afrodescendente, 2017.)
Ao abordar aspectos das sociedades africanas antigas, o excerto destaca
Provas
Read the advertisement.

(www.businessinsider.in. Adapted.)
The advertisement uses text and the image of two women astronauts in spacesuits to suggest that both the bath oil “Skin-So-Soft” and the suit
Provas

In the late 1960s, following the Apollo 11 Moon landings, the three astronauts were waiting to be picked up inside their capsule floating in the Pacific Ocean — and they were hot and uncomfortable. NASA officials decided to make things more pleasant for their three national heroes. The downside? There was a small possibility of unleashing deadly alien microbes on Earth.
When humanity first made plans to send probes and people into space in the mid-20th Century, the issue of contamination came up. Firstly, there was the fear of “forward” contamination — the possibility that Earth-based life might accidentally hitch a ride into the cosmos. Spacecraft needed to be sterilised and carefully packaged before launch. If microbes silently moved onboard, it would confuse any attempts to detect alien life. And if there were extra-terrestrial organisms out there, we might end up inadvertently killing them with Earth-based bacteria or viruses. These concerns matter just as much today as they did back in the Space Race era.
A second concern was “back” contamination. This was the idea that astronauts, rockets or probes returning to Earth might bring back life that could prove catastrophic, either by consuming all our oxygen or outcompeting Earth organisms. What if the astronauts brought back something dangerous? At the time, the probability was not considered high, but still, the scenario had to be explored. “Maybe it’s sure to 99% that Apollo 11 will not bring back lunar organisms,” said one influential scientist at the time, “but even that 1% of uncertainty is too large to be complacent about.”
NASA put several quarantine measures in place — in some cases, a little reluctantly. Concerned officials from the US Public Health Service argued for stricter measures than initially planned, pointing out that they had the power to refuse border entry to contaminated astronauts. NASA then agreed to install a costly quarantine facility on the ship that would pick up the men from their splashdown in the Pacific Ocean. It was also agreed that the lunar explorers would then spend three weeks in isolation before they could hug their families or shake the hand of the president.
(Richard Fisher. www.bbc.com, 18.02.2021. Adapted.)
According to the third and fourth paragraphs, the disputes over the potential risks posed by the return of Apollo 11 from outer space were eventually settled as follows:
Provas

In the late 1960s, following the Apollo 11 Moon landings, the three astronauts were waiting to be picked up inside their capsule floating in the Pacific Ocean — and they were hot and uncomfortable. NASA officials decided to make things more pleasant for their three national heroes. The downside? There was a small possibility of unleashing deadly alien microbes on Earth.
When humanity first made plans to send probes and people into space in the mid-20th Century, the issue of contamination came up. Firstly, there was the fear of “forward” contamination — the possibility that Earth-based life might accidentally hitch a ride into the cosmos. Spacecraft needed to be sterilised and carefully packaged before launch. If microbes silently moved onboard, it would confuse any attempts to detect alien life. And if there were extra-terrestrial organisms out there, we might end up inadvertently killing them with Earth-based bacteria or viruses. These concerns matter just as much today as they did back in the Space Race era.
A second concern was “back” contamination. This was the idea that astronauts, rockets or probes returning to Earth might bring back life that could prove catastrophic, either by consuming all our oxygen or outcompeting Earth organisms. What if the astronauts brought back something dangerous? At the time, the probability was not considered high, but still, the scenario had to be explored. “Maybe it’s sure to 99% that Apollo 11 will not bring back lunar organisms,” said one influential scientist at the time, “but even that 1% of uncertainty is too large to be complacent about.”
NASA put several quarantine measures in place — in some cases, a little reluctantly. Concerned officials from the US Public Health Service argued for stricter measures than initially planned, pointing out that they had the power to refuse border entry to contaminated astronauts. NASA then agreed to install a costly quarantine facility on the ship that would pick up the men from their splashdown in the Pacific Ocean. It was also agreed that the lunar explorers would then spend three weeks in isolation before they could hug their families or shake the hand of the president.
(Richard Fisher. www.bbc.com, 18.02.2021. Adapted.)
In the second paragraph, “‘forward’ contamination” is explained as contamination which
Provas

In the late 1960s, following the Apollo 11 Moon landings, the three astronauts were waiting to be picked up inside their capsule floating in the Pacific Ocean — and they were hot and uncomfortable. NASA officials decided to make things more pleasant for their three national heroes. The downside? There was a small possibility of unleashing deadly alien microbes on Earth.
When humanity first made plans to send probes and people into space in the mid-20th Century, the issue of contamination came up. Firstly, there was the fear of “forward” contamination — the possibility that Earth-based life might accidentally hitch a ride into the cosmos. Spacecraft needed to be sterilised and carefully packaged before launch. If microbes silently moved onboard, it would confuse any attempts to detect alien life. And if there were extra-terrestrial organisms out there, we might end up inadvertently killing them with Earth-based bacteria or viruses. These concerns matter just as much today as they did back in the Space Race era.
A second concern was “back” contamination. This was the idea that astronauts, rockets or probes returning to Earth might bring back life that could prove catastrophic, either by consuming all our oxygen or outcompeting Earth organisms. What if the astronauts brought back something dangerous? At the time, the probability was not considered high, but still, the scenario had to be explored. “Maybe it’s sure to 99% that Apollo 11 will not bring back lunar organisms,” said one influential scientist at the time, “but even that 1% of uncertainty is too large to be complacent about.”
NASA put several quarantine measures in place — in some cases, a little reluctantly. Concerned officials from the US Public Health Service argued for stricter measures than initially planned, pointing out that they had the power to refuse border entry to contaminated astronauts. NASA then agreed to install a costly quarantine facility on the ship that would pick up the men from their splashdown in the Pacific Ocean. It was also agreed that the lunar explorers would then spend three weeks in isolation before they could hug their families or shake the hand of the president.
(Richard Fisher. www.bbc.com, 18.02.2021. Adapted.)
The first paragraph mentions
Provas

In the late 1960s, following the Apollo 11 Moon landings, the three astronauts were waiting to be picked up inside their capsule floating in the Pacific Ocean — and they were hot and uncomfortable. NASA officials decided to make things more pleasant for their three national heroes. The downside? There was a small possibility of unleashing deadly alien microbes on Earth.
When humanity first made plans to send probes and people into space in the mid-20th Century, the issue of contamination came up. Firstly, there was the fear of “forward” contamination — the possibility that Earth-based life might accidentally hitch a ride into the cosmos. Spacecraft needed to be sterilised and carefully packaged before launch. If microbes silently moved onboard, it would confuse any attempts to detect alien life. And if there were extra-terrestrial organisms out there, we might end up inadvertently killing them with Earth-based bacteria or viruses. These concerns matter just as much today as they did back in the Space Race era.
A second concern was “back” contamination. This was the idea that astronauts, rockets or probes returning to Earth might bring back life that could prove catastrophic, either by consuming all our oxygen or outcompeting Earth organisms. What if the astronauts brought back something dangerous? At the time, the probability was not considered high, but still, the scenario had to be explored. “Maybe it’s sure to 99% that Apollo 11 will not bring back lunar organisms,” said one influential scientist at the time, “but even that 1% of uncertainty is too large to be complacent about.”
NASA put several quarantine measures in place — in some cases, a little reluctantly. Concerned officials from the US Public Health Service argued for stricter measures than initially planned, pointing out that they had the power to refuse border entry to contaminated astronauts. NASA then agreed to install a costly quarantine facility on the ship that would pick up the men from their splashdown in the Pacific Ocean. It was also agreed that the lunar explorers would then spend three weeks in isolation before they could hug their families or shake the hand of the president.
(Richard Fisher. www.bbc.com, 18.02.2021. Adapted.)
The text discusses
Provas
Caderno Container