Foram encontradas 310 questões.
Com base nas disposições do Código de Ética dos Agentes Públicos do IBAMA (Portaria n.º 2.534/2019 do IBAMA), julgue o item a seguir.
Incumbe à Diretoria de Planejamento ou à Coordenação-Geral de Gestão de Pessoas fornecer uma cópia do Código de Ética do IBAMA ao seu servidor, em meio físico ou digital, após a assinatura do termo de posse.
Provas
Questão presente nas seguintes provas
- UniãoExecutivoDecreto 1.171/1994: Código de Ética do Servidor Público Civil do Poder Executivo Federal
Com base nas disposições do Código de Ética dos Agentes Públicos do IBAMA (Portaria n.º 2.534/2019 do IBAMA), julgue o item a seguir.
As regras do Código de Ética Profissional do Servidor Público Civil do Poder Executivo Federal aplicam-se subsidiariamente à análise das condutas relacionadas à ética dos servidores do IBAMA.
Provas
Questão presente nas seguintes provas
Com base nas disposições do Código de Ética dos Agentes Públicos do IBAMA (Portaria n.º 2.534/2019 do IBAMA), julgue o item a seguir.
Os servidores do IBAMA ocupantes de cargos de natureza especial, a fim de adotar uma conduta ética no exercício de suas funções, devem-se ater às normas contidas no Código de Ética do IBAMA, no Código de Ética Profissional do Servidor Público Civil do Poder Executivo Federal e no Código de Conduta da Alta Administração Federal.
Provas
Questão presente nas seguintes provas
In the 1980s, plant genetic resources were considered
under international law to be a common heritage of mankind, and
were therefore classified as goods that cannot be owned.
However, this status was strongly rejected by many emerging
countries because it gave pharmaceutical and seed companies
(mostly from rich countries) free access to their genetic resources
without being required in any way to redistribute a share of their
profits.
These countries scored a victory with the signing of the
Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) in 1992 and the
TRIPS agreement in 1995. Genetic resources now come under
the control of sovereign countries, and some property rights can
be recognized to the indigenous communities on the resources
that they have been conserving from generation to generation.
States are now required to organize these “collective intellectual
property rights” in such a way that any local resource conserved
in this manner will generate dividends for these populations when
used by multinational firms.
The now well-known concept of Access to Genetic
Resources and Benefit-Sharing (ABS) emerged in the second half
of the 1990s. Their aim was to organize a biological diversity
marketplace capable of enhancing the value of the genetic
resources of countries of the South, which cannot refuse access to
these resources. In addition, these countries can now claim a
share of the profits that may result from their use.
In short, the change in the status of genetic resources from
common heritage of mankind to a good that can be owned under
national sovereignty took place in the early 1990s at the request
of countries of the South and to their benefit, and the ABS
mechanism is a fine example of intellectual property rights set up
in the interest of the people of these countries.
In a general sense, this analysis is fairly accurate and
could constitute an argument to be used against those who are of
the opinion that the spread of intellectual property rights is an
obstacle to the development of the South. However, the issue
today is whether the South gained anything by playing this card.
In answering this question, it is important to more clearly
emphasize the deep connection—often overlooked—between the
conservation of genetic resources and their practical use.
Internet:<https://shs.cairn.info/journal> (adapted).
Based on the preceding text, judge the following item.
The word “However”, in the second sentence of the last paragraph, can be correctly replaced with Nevertheless, without changing the original meaning of the fragment.
Provas
Questão presente nas seguintes provas
In the 1980s, plant genetic resources were considered
under international law to be a common heritage of mankind, and
were therefore classified as goods that cannot be owned.
However, this status was strongly rejected by many emerging
countries because it gave pharmaceutical and seed companies
(mostly from rich countries) free access to their genetic resources
without being required in any way to redistribute a share of their
profits.
These countries scored a victory with the signing of the
Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) in 1992 and the
TRIPS agreement in 1995. Genetic resources now come under
the control of sovereign countries, and some property rights can
be recognized to the indigenous communities on the resources
that they have been conserving from generation to generation.
States are now required to organize these “collective intellectual
property rights” in such a way that any local resource conserved
in this manner will generate dividends for these populations when
used by multinational firms.
The now well-known concept of Access to Genetic
Resources and Benefit-Sharing (ABS) emerged in the second half
of the 1990s. Their aim was to organize a biological diversity
marketplace capable of enhancing the value of the genetic
resources of countries of the South, which cannot refuse access to
these resources. In addition, these countries can now claim a
share of the profits that may result from their use.
In short, the change in the status of genetic resources from
common heritage of mankind to a good that can be owned under
national sovereignty took place in the early 1990s at the request
of countries of the South and to their benefit, and the ABS
mechanism is a fine example of intellectual property rights set up
in the interest of the people of these countries.
In a general sense, this analysis is fairly accurate and
could constitute an argument to be used against those who are of
the opinion that the spread of intellectual property rights is an
obstacle to the development of the South. However, the issue
today is whether the South gained anything by playing this card.
In answering this question, it is important to more clearly
emphasize the deep connection—often overlooked—between the
conservation of genetic resources and their practical use.
Internet:<https://shs.cairn.info/journal> (adapted).
Based on the preceding text, judge the following item.
The text argues that the spread of intellectual property rights has clearly benefited the countries of the South, proving that it is not an obstacle to their development.
Provas
Questão presente nas seguintes provas
In the 1980s, plant genetic resources were considered
under international law to be a common heritage of mankind, and
were therefore classified as goods that cannot be owned.
However, this status was strongly rejected by many emerging
countries because it gave pharmaceutical and seed companies
(mostly from rich countries) free access to their genetic resources
without being required in any way to redistribute a share of their
profits.
These countries scored a victory with the signing of the
Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) in 1992 and the
TRIPS agreement in 1995. Genetic resources now come under
the control of sovereign countries, and some property rights can
be recognized to the indigenous communities on the resources
that they have been conserving from generation to generation.
States are now required to organize these “collective intellectual
property rights” in such a way that any local resource conserved
in this manner will generate dividends for these populations when
used by multinational firms.
The now well-known concept of Access to Genetic
Resources and Benefit-Sharing (ABS) emerged in the second half
of the 1990s. Their aim was to organize a biological diversity
marketplace capable of enhancing the value of the genetic
resources of countries of the South, which cannot refuse access to
these resources. In addition, these countries can now claim a
share of the profits that may result from their use.
In short, the change in the status of genetic resources from
common heritage of mankind to a good that can be owned under
national sovereignty took place in the early 1990s at the request
of countries of the South and to their benefit, and the ABS
mechanism is a fine example of intellectual property rights set up
in the interest of the people of these countries.
In a general sense, this analysis is fairly accurate and
could constitute an argument to be used against those who are of
the opinion that the spread of intellectual property rights is an
obstacle to the development of the South. However, the issue
today is whether the South gained anything by playing this card.
In answering this question, it is important to more clearly
emphasize the deep connection—often overlooked—between the
conservation of genetic resources and their practical use.
Internet:<https://shs.cairn.info/journal> (adapted).
Based on the preceding text, judge the following item.
The shift from the perception of genetic resources as mankind’s common heritage to its condition of property of national sovereignty was demanded by countries of the South.
Provas
Questão presente nas seguintes provas
In the 1980s, plant genetic resources were considered
under international law to be a common heritage of mankind, and
were therefore classified as goods that cannot be owned.
However, this status was strongly rejected by many emerging
countries because it gave pharmaceutical and seed companies
(mostly from rich countries) free access to their genetic resources
without being required in any way to redistribute a share of their
profits.
These countries scored a victory with the signing of the
Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) in 1992 and the
TRIPS agreement in 1995. Genetic resources now come under
the control of sovereign countries, and some property rights can
be recognized to the indigenous communities on the resources
that they have been conserving from generation to generation.
States are now required to organize these “collective intellectual
property rights” in such a way that any local resource conserved
in this manner will generate dividends for these populations when
used by multinational firms.
The now well-known concept of Access to Genetic
Resources and Benefit-Sharing (ABS) emerged in the second half
of the 1990s. Their aim was to organize a biological diversity
marketplace capable of enhancing the value of the genetic
resources of countries of the South, which cannot refuse access to
these resources. In addition, these countries can now claim a
share of the profits that may result from their use.
In short, the change in the status of genetic resources from
common heritage of mankind to a good that can be owned under
national sovereignty took place in the early 1990s at the request
of countries of the South and to their benefit, and the ABS
mechanism is a fine example of intellectual property rights set up
in the interest of the people of these countries.
In a general sense, this analysis is fairly accurate and
could constitute an argument to be used against those who are of
the opinion that the spread of intellectual property rights is an
obstacle to the development of the South. However, the issue
today is whether the South gained anything by playing this card.
In answering this question, it is important to more clearly
emphasize the deep connection—often overlooked—between the
conservation of genetic resources and their practical use.
Internet:<https://shs.cairn.info/journal> (adapted).
Based on the preceding text, judge the following item.
In the 1980s, genetic resources were regarded as private property under international law, allowing multinational corporations to control them freely.
Provas
Questão presente nas seguintes provas
In the 1980s, plant genetic resources were considered
under international law to be a common heritage of mankind, and
were therefore classified as goods that cannot be owned.
However, this status was strongly rejected by many emerging
countries because it gave pharmaceutical and seed companies
(mostly from rich countries) free access to their genetic resources
without being required in any way to redistribute a share of their
profits.
These countries scored a victory with the signing of the
Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) in 1992 and the
TRIPS agreement in 1995. Genetic resources now come under
the control of sovereign countries, and some property rights can
be recognized to the indigenous communities on the resources
that they have been conserving from generation to generation.
States are now required to organize these “collective intellectual
property rights” in such a way that any local resource conserved
in this manner will generate dividends for these populations when
used by multinational firms.
The now well-known concept of Access to Genetic
Resources and Benefit-Sharing (ABS) emerged in the second half
of the 1990s. Their aim was to organize a biological diversity
marketplace capable of enhancing the value of the genetic
resources of countries of the South, which cannot refuse access to
these resources. In addition, these countries can now claim a
share of the profits that may result from their use.
In short, the change in the status of genetic resources from
common heritage of mankind to a good that can be owned under
national sovereignty took place in the early 1990s at the request
of countries of the South and to their benefit, and the ABS
mechanism is a fine example of intellectual property rights set up
in the interest of the people of these countries.
In a general sense, this analysis is fairly accurate and
could constitute an argument to be used against those who are of
the opinion that the spread of intellectual property rights is an
obstacle to the development of the South. However, the issue
today is whether the South gained anything by playing this card.
In answering this question, it is important to more clearly
emphasize the deep connection—often overlooked—between the
conservation of genetic resources and their practical use.
Internet:<https://shs.cairn.info/journal> (adapted).
Based on the preceding text, judge the following item.
According to the text, the ABS system was created to prevent multinational companies from using the genetic resources of countries of the South.
Provas
Questão presente nas seguintes provas
Julgue o item a seguir, relativo à análise de redes sociais (ARS),
ferramenta que permite compreender a dinâmica de comunidades
online na Web.
A capacidade de essa ferramenta prever com precisão a propagação de informações em tempo real é diretamente proporcional à granularidade dos dados coletados, independentemente da complexidade dos algoritmos utilizados.
A capacidade de essa ferramenta prever com precisão a propagação de informações em tempo real é diretamente proporcional à granularidade dos dados coletados, independentemente da complexidade dos algoritmos utilizados.
Provas
Questão presente nas seguintes provas
Julgue o item subsequente, com base no disposto na Lei de
Acesso à Informação (LAI) e na Lei Geral de Proteção de
Dados (LGPD).
A implementação de um sistema de reconhecimento facial por um órgão público municipal para fins de segurança em espaços públicos estará em conformidade com as referidas normas legais se esse órgão publicar, em seu sítio eletrônico, um relatório detalhado de impacto à proteção de dados pessoais (RIPD), informar os critérios de identificação facial utilizados e garantir o direito de acesso dos cidadãos às suas próprias imagens armazenadas no sistema.
A implementação de um sistema de reconhecimento facial por um órgão público municipal para fins de segurança em espaços públicos estará em conformidade com as referidas normas legais se esse órgão publicar, em seu sítio eletrônico, um relatório detalhado de impacto à proteção de dados pessoais (RIPD), informar os critérios de identificação facial utilizados e garantir o direito de acesso dos cidadãos às suas próprias imagens armazenadas no sistema.
Provas
Questão presente nas seguintes provas
Cadernos
Caderno Container