Foram encontradas 70 questões.
Segundo o Atlas da Violência de 2025, Sergipe tem a menor taxa
do Nordeste no número de mortes de mulheres por 100 mil
habitantes. Confirmando essa estatística, a Secretaria da
Segurança Pública de Sergipe (SSP/SE) informou que o estado tem
apresentado uma redução expressiva no número de Mortes
Violentas Letais Intencionais (MVIs) e destacou que, para reduzir a
violência, incluindo o feminicídio, são necessárias ações
combinadas de prevenção e resposta.
Adaptado de https://g1.globo.com/se/sergipe/noticia/2025/05/12/sergipe-temmenor-taxa-do-nordeste-no-numero-de-mulheres-mortas-a-cada-100- mil-habitantes.ghtml
Partindo do relato, analise as afirmativas a seguir a respeito das possíveis estratégias adotadas para reduzir os índices de morte violenta de mulheres.
I. A adoção de políticas públicas nos Estados, responsáveis diretos pelas polícias militar e civil, ajuda a explicar essa queda, sobretudo em situações em que as polícias atuam junto com o Ministério Público local em forças-tarefas para a realização de investigações.
II. A facilitação da compra e do porte de armas mediante normativas voltadas a colecionadores e atiradores desportivos disponibiliza armamento para civis, o que favorece a autodefesa e explica a queda nas taxas de feminicídio.
III. O aumento de abordagens de policiamento ostensivo impacta diretamente na diminuição de homicídios motivados por gênero, combatendo mais especificamente a violência doméstica e intrafamiliar.
Está correto o que se afirma em
Adaptado de https://g1.globo.com/se/sergipe/noticia/2025/05/12/sergipe-temmenor-taxa-do-nordeste-no-numero-de-mulheres-mortas-a-cada-100- mil-habitantes.ghtml
Partindo do relato, analise as afirmativas a seguir a respeito das possíveis estratégias adotadas para reduzir os índices de morte violenta de mulheres.
I. A adoção de políticas públicas nos Estados, responsáveis diretos pelas polícias militar e civil, ajuda a explicar essa queda, sobretudo em situações em que as polícias atuam junto com o Ministério Público local em forças-tarefas para a realização de investigações.
II. A facilitação da compra e do porte de armas mediante normativas voltadas a colecionadores e atiradores desportivos disponibiliza armamento para civis, o que favorece a autodefesa e explica a queda nas taxas de feminicídio.
III. O aumento de abordagens de policiamento ostensivo impacta diretamente na diminuição de homicídios motivados por gênero, combatendo mais especificamente a violência doméstica e intrafamiliar.
Está correto o que se afirma em
Provas
Questão presente nas seguintes provas
Abel, Breno, Ciro e Diogo dividem um apartamento alugado e
precisaram fazer uma pequena obra de manutenção e melhorias.
Para pagar o custo da obra cada um dos quatro contribuiu com
uma quantia diferente, de acordo com suas possibilidades. Sabe-se que:
• Abel deu a terça parte da quantia que os outros três deram juntos.
• Breno deu a quarta parte da quantia que os outros três deram juntos.
• Ciro deu a quinta parte da quantia que os outros três deram juntos.
• Diogo deu 2300 reais.
O custo total da obra foi um valor:
• Abel deu a terça parte da quantia que os outros três deram juntos.
• Breno deu a quarta parte da quantia que os outros três deram juntos.
• Ciro deu a quinta parte da quantia que os outros três deram juntos.
• Diogo deu 2300 reais.
O custo total da obra foi um valor:
Provas
Questão presente nas seguintes provas
Duas caixas, A e B, contêm bolas que se distinguem apenas pela cor. Umas são brancas, outras amarelas e as demais, vermelhas. As quantidades de bolas de cada cor dentro de cada caixa estão no quadro abaixo.
| Caixas | Bolas | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Brancas | Amarelas | Vermelhas | |
| A | 3 | 2 | 5 |
| B | 7 | 10 | 3 |
Retirando ao acaso uma bola de cada caixa, a probabilidade de que as duas bolas sejam da mesma cor é igual a
Provas
Questão presente nas seguintes provas
Seis pessoas com idades todas diferentes devem formar uma fila.
O número de filas diferentes em que a pessoa mais nova é a primeira ou a mais velha é a última é:
O número de filas diferentes em que a pessoa mais nova é a primeira ou a mais velha é a última é:
Provas
Questão presente nas seguintes provas
Uma sequência tem como primeiro termo o número 10 e, a partir
dele, cada termo é igual ao anterior somado com 7.
O primeiro termo dessa sequência que ultrapassa 1000 é:
O primeiro termo dessa sequência que ultrapassa 1000 é:
Provas
Questão presente nas seguintes provas
- Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehension
- Gramática - Língua InglesaPalavras conectivas | Connective words
READ THE TEXT AND ANSWER QUESTION
The importance of assessing the social and economic impacts of
environmental policies
Policymakers face the challenge of supporting both inclusive and
sustainable economic development and a healthy environment.
While the most desirable policy outcome is one that achieves the
greatest environmental benefits while also advancing socioeconomic goals, it is important for policymakers to fully
understand the possible trade-offs between these objectives. A
better understanding of the broader impacts of environmental
policies is crucial to mitigate their adverse effects on competing
goals, especially as countries are faced with the arduous task of
responding to mounting environmental challenges in economically
turbulent times.
Governments are under pressure to scale up and accelerate their
ambition on climate and environmental goals. But in taking such
action forward, they have to carefully navigate a number of
headwinds. These include the long-term impacts of the COVID-19
pandemic on both the economy and society, cost-of-living crisis,
political tensions and geopolitical crises such as the Russian
invasion of Ukraine. Low-income people and the poorest
economies are the hardest hit, primarily due to the steep increases
in the price of energy and food.
The level of environmental policy stringency can have an impact
on a variety of policy outcomes. Empirical research is crucial to
shed light on these interlinkages. Previous research has shown that
more stringent environmental policy has achieved significant
environmental benefits with little aggregate effect on economic
performance. However, localized effects may generate winners
and losers, with significant losses for certain sectors, firms or
individuals and benefits for others. Nonetheless, at present, the
empirical evidence on these distributional aspects is still scarce,
despite its crucial role in supporting good policy design. More than
ever, regulators need better tools and insights to assess the
consequences of environmental policies on the economy and on
social outcomes.
Adapted from the brochure downloaded from
https://www.oecd.org/en/topics/social-and-economic-impacts-ofenvironmental-policies.html
Provas
Questão presente nas seguintes provas
READ THE TEXT AND ANSWER QUESTION
The importance of assessing the social and economic impacts of
environmental policies
Policymakers face the challenge of supporting both inclusive and
sustainable economic development and a healthy environment.
While the most desirable policy outcome is one that achieves the
greatest environmental benefits while also advancing socioeconomic goals, it is important for policymakers to fully
understand the possible trade-offs between these objectives. A
better understanding of the broader impacts of environmental
policies is crucial to mitigate their adverse effects on competing
goals, especially as countries are faced with the arduous task of
responding to mounting environmental challenges in economically
turbulent times.
Governments are under pressure to scale up and accelerate their
ambition on climate and environmental goals. But in taking such
action forward, they have to carefully navigate a number of
headwinds. These include the long-term impacts of the COVID-19
pandemic on both the economy and society, cost-of-living crisis,
political tensions and geopolitical crises such as the Russian
invasion of Ukraine. Low-income people and the poorest
economies are the hardest hit, primarily due to the steep increases
in the price of energy and food.
The level of environmental policy stringency can have an impact
on a variety of policy outcomes. Empirical research is crucial to
shed light on these interlinkages. Previous research has shown that
more stringent environmental policy has achieved significant
environmental benefits with little aggregate effect on economic
performance. However, localized effects may generate winners
and losers, with significant losses for certain sectors, firms or
individuals and benefits for others. Nonetheless, at present, the
empirical evidence on these distributional aspects is still scarce,
despite its crucial role in supporting good policy design. More than
ever, regulators need better tools and insights to assess the
consequences of environmental policies on the economy and on
social outcomes.
Adapted from the brochure downloaded from
https://www.oecd.org/en/topics/social-and-economic-impacts-ofenvironmental-policies.html
Provas
Questão presente nas seguintes provas
READ THE TEXT AND ANSWER QUESTION
The importance of assessing the social and economic impacts of
environmental policies
Policymakers face the challenge of supporting both inclusive and
sustainable economic development and a healthy environment.
While the most desirable policy outcome is one that achieves the
greatest environmental benefits while also advancing socioeconomic goals, it is important for policymakers to fully
understand the possible trade-offs between these objectives. A
better understanding of the broader impacts of environmental
policies is crucial to mitigate their adverse effects on competing
goals, especially as countries are faced with the arduous task of
responding to mounting environmental challenges in economically
turbulent times.
Governments are under pressure to scale up and accelerate their
ambition on climate and environmental goals. But in taking such
action forward, they have to carefully navigate a number of
headwinds. These include the long-term impacts of the COVID-19
pandemic on both the economy and society, cost-of-living crisis,
political tensions and geopolitical crises such as the Russian
invasion of Ukraine. Low-income people and the poorest
economies are the hardest hit, primarily due to the steep increases
in the price of energy and food.
The level of environmental policy stringency can have an impact
on a variety of policy outcomes. Empirical research is crucial to
shed light on these interlinkages. Previous research has shown that
more stringent environmental policy has achieved significant
environmental benefits with little aggregate effect on economic
performance. However, localized effects may generate winners
and losers, with significant losses for certain sectors, firms or
individuals and benefits for others. Nonetheless, at present, the
empirical evidence on these distributional aspects is still scarce,
despite its crucial role in supporting good policy design. More than
ever, regulators need better tools and insights to assess the
consequences of environmental policies on the economy and on
social outcomes.
Adapted from the brochure downloaded from
https://www.oecd.org/en/topics/social-and-economic-impacts-ofenvironmental-policies.html
(in https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english) is:
Provas
Questão presente nas seguintes provas
READ THE TEXT AND ANSWER QUESTION
The importance of assessing the social and economic impacts of
environmental policies
Policymakers face the challenge of supporting both inclusive and
sustainable economic development and a healthy environment.
While the most desirable policy outcome is one that achieves the
greatest environmental benefits while also advancing socioeconomic goals, it is important for policymakers to fully
understand the possible trade-offs between these objectives. A
better understanding of the broader impacts of environmental
policies is crucial to mitigate their adverse effects on competing
goals, especially as countries are faced with the arduous task of
responding to mounting environmental challenges in economically
turbulent times.
Governments are under pressure to scale up and accelerate their
ambition on climate and environmental goals. But in taking such
action forward, they have to carefully navigate a number of
headwinds. These include the long-term impacts of the COVID-19
pandemic on both the economy and society, cost-of-living crisis,
political tensions and geopolitical crises such as the Russian
invasion of Ukraine. Low-income people and the poorest
economies are the hardest hit, primarily due to the steep increases
in the price of energy and food.
The level of environmental policy stringency can have an impact
on a variety of policy outcomes. Empirical research is crucial to
shed light on these interlinkages. Previous research has shown that
more stringent environmental policy has achieved significant
environmental benefits with little aggregate effect on economic
performance. However, localized effects may generate winners
and losers, with significant losses for certain sectors, firms or
individuals and benefits for others. Nonetheless, at present, the
empirical evidence on these distributional aspects is still scarce,
despite its crucial role in supporting good policy design. More than
ever, regulators need better tools and insights to assess the
consequences of environmental policies on the economy and on
social outcomes.
Adapted from the brochure downloaded from
https://www.oecd.org/en/topics/social-and-economic-impacts-ofenvironmental-policies.html
Provas
Questão presente nas seguintes provas
READ THE TEXT AND ANSWER QUESTION
The importance of assessing the social and economic impacts of
environmental policies
Policymakers face the challenge of supporting both inclusive and
sustainable economic development and a healthy environment.
While the most desirable policy outcome is one that achieves the
greatest environmental benefits while also advancing socioeconomic goals, it is important for policymakers to fully
understand the possible trade-offs between these objectives. A
better understanding of the broader impacts of environmental
policies is crucial to mitigate their adverse effects on competing
goals, especially as countries are faced with the arduous task of
responding to mounting environmental challenges in economically
turbulent times.
Governments are under pressure to scale up and accelerate their
ambition on climate and environmental goals. But in taking such
action forward, they have to carefully navigate a number of
headwinds. These include the long-term impacts of the COVID-19
pandemic on both the economy and society, cost-of-living crisis,
political tensions and geopolitical crises such as the Russian
invasion of Ukraine. Low-income people and the poorest
economies are the hardest hit, primarily due to the steep increases
in the price of energy and food.
The level of environmental policy stringency can have an impact
on a variety of policy outcomes. Empirical research is crucial to
shed light on these interlinkages. Previous research has shown that
more stringent environmental policy has achieved significant
environmental benefits with little aggregate effect on economic
performance. However, localized effects may generate winners
and losers, with significant losses for certain sectors, firms or
individuals and benefits for others. Nonetheless, at present, the
empirical evidence on these distributional aspects is still scarce,
despite its crucial role in supporting good policy design. More than
ever, regulators need better tools and insights to assess the
consequences of environmental policies on the economy and on
social outcomes.
Adapted from the brochure downloaded from
https://www.oecd.org/en/topics/social-and-economic-impacts-ofenvironmental-policies.html
I. In working towards their environmental goals, governments may meet some hurdles.
II. The cost of energy and food has soared lately, slightly impacting those whose level of income is below the threshold.
III. Currently, scientific data on localized effects of environmental policies and social consequences abound.
Choose the correct answer:
Provas
Questão presente nas seguintes provas
Cadernos
Caderno Container