Foram encontradas 54 questões.
Don’t Look Up: four climate experts on the
polarising disaster film
Critics haven’t been kind to Adam McKay’s eco-satire, but many climate experts are lauding it. Here four give their views
Rarely has a film been as divisive as Adam McKay’s climate satire Don’t Look Upa. Although it has been watched by millionsb, and is already Netflix’s third most watched film ever, the response from critics was largely negative. Many found its story of scientists who discover an asteroid heading for Earth a clumsy allegory for the climate crisis, while others just found it boring. But many in the climate movement have praised the filmc, and audience reviews have been generally positived.
We asked four climate experts to give their views on the film. Warning: spoilers ahead.
Ketan Joshi: ‘The main character of the climate crisis is absent’
[…]
Fiona Harvey: ‘The role of the technoloon, played by Mark Rylance, struck a chord’
[…]
After 17 years of reporting on the climate crisis, I doubted at first that the film had much to tell me about the frustrations of communicating a hypothetical catastrophe. As the film’s scientists first struggled to clothe their data in sober, measured terms, then broke into swearing, armwaving shrieks about provable imminent apocalypse, I nodded along. Yes, that’s what it feels like, and no, no one listens, not until it is too late.
Yet it was illuminating in unexpected ways – something I’ve always struggled with is how rational people can fail to grasp the scale of climate breakdown, how we could leave it so late. As the film shows, it’s partly because vested interests keep it that way, but it’s also just because we’re human. Believing in disaster before it strikes is fundamentally not how we work.
The role of the techno-loon, played by Mark Rylance, struck another chord. Cop26 was not a failure, though on the surface that was the obvious conclusion – it was more nuanced than that. Soon after the Cop26 circus left Glasgow, the danger of painting the outcome in such blackand- white terms became apparent, as wellmeaning experts concluded – in all seriousness – as talking didn’t work, our best hope would be for billionaires to bypass the UN and geoengineer the climate from space. Because obviously the answer to a vast uncontrolled experiment on the atmosphere is to conduct a vast uncontrolled experiment on the atmosphere.
[…]
Nina Lakhani: ‘Jennifer Lawrence’s character will resonate with many female climate scientists’
[…]
How Kate Dibiasky, the postgraduate student played by Jennifer Lawrence who discovered the comet, is portrayed as an unhinged hysterical woman, will resonate with many female climate scientists and activists whose crucial knowledge has been sidelined. The scene where her parents declare that they’re in favour of the jobs the comet will provide will resonate with millions of people, including me,trying to deal with relatives who have bought into political lies.
[…]
Damian Carrington: ‘It highlights the absurdity of staring disaster in the face, then looking away’
I loved Don’t Look Up, both as an entertainment and as a climate crisis parable. Butthe movie has been panned by many critics, with the main charge being that it is heavy-handed, blunt and too obvious. But that is exactly the point.
Scientists have been issuing blunt warnings about obvious dangers of global heating for years and have been ignored – carbon emissions are still rising. The film perfectly skewers the key ways in which they have been ignored: for short-term political expediency and short-term corporate profit.
In particular, the movie beautifully portrays the incredulity of scientists that their carefully constructed evidence can be dismissed with bluster such as “we’ll sit tight and assess” by leaders more concerned about today’s political weather and a media more interested in the minutiae of celebrities’ lives.
[…]
The point of the film is savagely highlighting the absurdity of staring disaster in the face, then looking away rather than acting. In that respect, it is a triumph.
Source: https://www.theguardian.
com/film/2022/jan/08/dont-look-upfour- climate-experts-on-the-polarising-disaster-film. Access: 08/01/2022.
Consider the following excerpts taken from the text and mark the option which presents a verb form in the passive voice.
Provas
Don’t Look Up: four climate experts on the
polarising disaster film
Critics haven’t been kind to Adam McKay’s eco-satire, but many climate experts are lauding it. Here four give their views
Rarely has a film been as divisive as Adam McKay’s climate satire Don’t Look Up. Although it has been watched by millions, and is already Netflix’s third most watched film ever, the response from critics was largely negative. Many found its story of scientists who discover an asteroid heading for Earth a clumsy allegory for the climate crisis, while others just found it boring. But many in the climate movement have praised the film, and audience reviews have been generally positive.
We asked four climate experts to give their views on the film. Warning: spoilers ahead.
Ketan Joshi: ‘The main character of the climate crisis is absent’
[…]
Fiona Harvey: ‘The role of the technoloon, played by Mark Rylance, struck a chord’
[…]
After 17 years of reporting on the climate crisis, I doubted at first that the film had much to tell me about the frustrations of communicating a hypothetical catastrophe. As the film’s scientists first struggled to clothe their data in sober, measured terms, then broke into swearing, armwaving shrieks about provable imminent apocalypse, I nodded along. Yes, that’s what it feels like, and no, no one listens, not until it is too late.
Yet it was illuminating in unexpected ways – something I’ve always struggled with is how rational people can fail to grasp the scale of climate breakdown, how we could leave it so late. As the film shows, it’s partly because vested interests keep it that way, but it’s also just because we’re human. Believing in disaster before it strikes is fundamentally not how we work.
The role of the techno-loon, played by Mark Rylance, struck another chord. Cop26 was not a failure, though on the surface that was the obvious conclusion – it was more nuanced than that. Soon after the Cop26 circus left Glasgow, the danger of painting the outcome in such blackand- white terms became apparent, as wellmeaning experts concluded – in all seriousness – as talking didn’t work, our best hope would be for billionaires to bypass the UN and geoengineer the climate from space. Because obviously the answer to a vast uncontrolled experiment on the atmosphere is to conduct a vast uncontrolled experiment on the atmosphere.
[…]
Nina Lakhani: ‘Jennifer Lawrence’s character will resonate with many female climate scientists’
[…]
How Kate Dibiasky, the postgraduate student played by Jennifer Lawrence who discovered the comet, is portrayed as an unhinged hysterical woman, will resonate with many female climate scientists and activists whose crucial knowledge has been sidelined. The scene where her parents declare that they’re in favour of the jobs the comet will provide will resonate with millions of people, including me,trying to deal with relatives who have bought into political lies.
[…]
Damian Carrington: ‘It highlights the absurdity of staring disaster in the face, then looking away’
I loved Don’t Look Up, both as an entertainment and as a climate crisis parable. Butthe movie has been panned by many critics, with the main charge being that it is heavy-handed, blunt and too obvious. But that is exactly the point.
Scientists have been issuing blunt warnings about obvious dangers of global heating for years and have been ignored – carbon emissions are still rising. The film perfectly skewers the key ways in which they have been ignored: for short-term political expediency and short-term corporate profit.
In particular, the movie beautifully portrays the incredulity of scientists that their carefully constructed evidence can be dismissed with bluster such as “we’ll sit tight and assess” by leaders more concerned about today’s political weather and a media more interested in the minutiae of celebrities’ lives.
[…]
The point of the film is savagely highlighting the absurdity of staring disaster in the face, then looking away rather than acting. In that respect, it is a triumph.
Source: https://www.theguardian.
com/film/2022/jan/08/dont-look-upfour- climate-experts-on-the-polarising-disaster-film. Access: 08/01/2022.
Concerning the excerpt: “Critics haven’t been kind to Adam McKay’s eco-satire, but many climate experts are lauding it”, and the context it was taken from, mark the correct
option regarding the usage of the pronoun “it”.
Provas
Don’t Look Up: four climate experts on the
polarising disaster film
Critics haven’t been kind to Adam McKay’s eco-satire, but many climate experts are lauding it. Here four give their views
Rarely has a film been as divisive as Adam McKay’s climate satire Don’t Look Up. Although it has been watched by millions, and is already Netflix’s third most watched film ever, the response from critics was largely negative. Many found its story of scientists who discover an asteroid heading for Earth a clumsy allegory for the climate crisis, while others just found it boring. But many in the climate movement have praised the film, and audience reviews have been generally positive.
We asked four climate experts to give their views on the film. Warning: spoilers ahead.
Ketan Joshi: ‘The main character of the climate crisis is absent’
[…]
Fiona Harvey: ‘The role of the technoloon, played by Mark Rylance, struck a chord’
[…]
After 17 years of reporting on the climate crisis, I doubted at first that the film had much to tell me about the frustrations of communicating a hypothetical catastrophe. As the film’s scientists first struggled to clothe their data in sober, measured terms, then broke into swearing, armwaving shrieks about provable imminent apocalypse, I nodded along. Yes, that’s what it feels like, and no, no one listens, not until it is too late.
Yet it was illuminating in unexpected ways – something I’ve always struggled with is how rational people can fail to grasp the scale of climate breakdown, how we could leave it so late. As the film shows, it’s partly because vested interests keep it that way, but it’s also just because we’re human. Believing in disaster before it strikes is fundamentally not how we work.
The role of the techno-loon, played by Mark Rylance, struck another chord. Cop26 was not a failure, though on the surface that was the obvious conclusion – it was more nuanced than that. Soon after the Cop26 circus left Glasgow, the danger of painting the outcome in such blackand- white terms became apparent, as wellmeaning experts concluded – in all seriousness – as talking didn’t work, our best hope would be for billionaires to bypass the UN and geoengineer the climate from space. Because obviously the answer to a vast uncontrolled experiment on the atmosphere is to conduct a vast uncontrolled experiment on the atmosphere.
[…]
Nina Lakhani: ‘Jennifer Lawrence’s character will resonate with many female climate scientists’
[…]
How Kate Dibiasky, the postgraduate student played by Jennifer Lawrence who discovered the comet, is portrayed as an unhinged hysterical woman, will resonate with many female climate scientists and activists whose crucial knowledge has been sidelined. The scene where her parents declare that they’re in favour of the jobs the comet will provide will resonate with millions of people, including me,trying to deal with relatives who have bought into political lies.
[…]
Damian Carrington: ‘It highlights the absurdity of staring disaster in the face, then looking away’
I loved Don’t Look Up, both as an entertainment and as a climate crisis parable. Butthe movie has been panned by many critics, with the main charge being that it is heavy-handed, blunt and too obvious. But that is exactly the point.
Scientists have been issuing blunt warnings about obvious dangers of global heating for years and have been ignored – carbon emissions are still rising. The film perfectly skewers the key ways in which they have been ignored: for short-term political expediency and short-term corporate profit.
In particular, the movie beautifully portrays the incredulity of scientists that their carefully constructed evidence can be dismissed with bluster such as “we’ll sit tight and assess” by leaders more concerned about today’s political weather and a media more interested in the minutiae of celebrities’ lives.
[…]
The point of the film is savagely highlighting the absurdity of staring disaster in the face, then looking away rather than acting. In that respect, it is a triumph.
Source: https://www.theguardian.
com/film/2022/jan/08/dont-look-upfour- climate-experts-on-the-polarising-disaster-film. Access: 08/01/2022.
The text talks about Netflix climate satire Don’t look up. Mark the correct option concerning how the movie was received by critics.
Provas
As medidas dos lados de um triângulo retângulo T1 estão em Progressão Aritmética de razão r e as medidas dos lados de um triângulo T2 estão em Progressão Geométrica, também de razão r. Sabendo que a área de T1 mede 54 cm2 e que o perímetro de T2 mede 65 cm, a diferença entre a medida do maior lado de T2 e a medida do maior lado de T1 é de
Provas
Se !$ sen(x) = { large sqrt{5} over 5} !$ com !$ { large pi over 2} < x < pi !$, então o valor de cotg(x) – cos(x) é igual a
Provas
Um professor solicitou que seus alunos encontrassem o domínio da função !$ f: mathbb{R} ightarrow mathbb{R} !$ definida por !$ f(x) = sqrt{ { large x over x -1} - { large 2x over x +1}} !$. O aluno A resolveu a questão, mas cometeu um erro e respondeu que o domínio dessa função é !$ S_1 = left { x,in,mathbb{R} / 0 le x le 3 ight } !$. O aluno B resolveu a questão corretamente e respondeu que o domínio dessa função é S2. Sendo A o conjunto dos números inteiros pertencentes a S1 e B o conjunto dos números inteiros pertencentes a S2 , é correto afirmar que !$ A cap B !$ é igual a
Provas
Sejam !$ A = { egin{pmatrix} log,x,,,log,y\1,,,,,,2 end{pmatrix}} !$ e !$ B=egin{pmatrix} log y & log x \ 0 & 1end{pmatrix} !$ sabendo que det A = 2 e det B = 0 , é correto afirmar que
Provas
Existem dois números de cinco algarismos distintos que satisfazem às seguintes condições:
• ambos são divisíveis por 9 e por 5;
• o segundo algarismo é o dobro do primeiro e a soma desses dois algarismos é 6;
• o quarto algarismo é a soma do primeiro e do terceiro algarismos.
Nessas condições, a diferença entre o maior número e o menor número é um número
Provas
Leia os artigos transcritos a seguir, extraídos da Declaração dos Direitos do Homem e do Cidadão, de 26 de agosto de 1789.
Artigo 1º: Os homens nascem e permanecem livres e iguais em direitos. As distinções sociais não podem ser fundamentadas senão sobre a utilidade comum. Artigo 6º: A lei é a expressão da vontade geral. Todos os cidadãos têm o direito de concorrer, pessoalmente ou pelos seus representantes, na sua formação. Ela tem de ser a mesma para todos, quer seja protegendo, quer seja punindo. Todos os cidadãos, sendo iguais aos seus olhos, são igualmente admissíveis a todas as dignidades, lugares e empregos públicos, segundo a capacidade deles, e sem outra distinção que a de suas virtudes e talentos.
A Declaração dos Direitos do Homem e do Cidadão foi proclamada no contexto da Revolução Francesa (1789). Sobre esse documento, analise as assertivas e assinale a alternativa que aponta as corretas.
I. A Declaração dos Direitos do Homem e do Cidadão foi escrita por influência das ideias iluministas em agosto de 1789.
II. A Declaração expressa a defesa e que todos os homens são iguais porque têm direitos iguais e a lei deve representar a vontade geral.
III. A Declaração expressa que a lei deve ser a representação da vontade da nobreza e do monarca.
IV. A Declaração dos Direitos do Homem e do cidadão expressa a defesa da vontade popular sob inspiração da Teoria dos Direitos Divinos do Rei.
Provas
Texto I
Laerte. Disponível em: https://www.instagram.com/p/CWtk14SFixR/. Acesso em 19 jan. 2022.
Texto II
Mudam-se os tempos, mudam-se as vontades
Luiz Vaz de Camões
Mudam-se os tempos, mudam-se as vontades,
Muda-se o ser, muda-se a confiança;
Todo o mundo é composto de mudança,
Tomando sempre novas qualidades.
Continuamente vemos novidades,
Diferentes em tudo da esperança;
Do mal ficam as mágoas na lembrança,
E do bem, se algum houve, as saudades.
O tempo cobre o chão de verde manto,
Que já coberto foi de neve fria,
E em mim converte em choro o doce canto.
E, afora este mudar-se cada dia,
Outra mudança faz de mor espanto:
Que não se muda já como soía.
Disponível em: https://www.escritas.org/pt/t/2513/mudam-se-ostempos- mudam-se-as-vontades. Acesso em 17 jan. 2022.
Glossário:
Soía: costumava
Com base no conteúdo e nos aspectos textuais dos Textos I e II, assinale a alternativa correta.
Provas
Caderno Container