Foram encontradas 950 questões.
Um experimento foi realizado para se testar o efeito de 3 recipientes para a produção e desenvolvimento de mudas de 2 espécies de eucaliptos. Os recipientes (R1, R2, R3) e as espécies (E1, E2) foram identificados com os seguintes códigos:
R1 = saco plástico pequeno;
R2 = saco plástico grande;
R3 = laminado;
E1 = Eucalyptus citriodora;
E2 = Eucalyptus grandis.
Bonzato e Kronka. In: Experimentação Agrícola. Ed. Funep, 1992 (com adaptações).
|
altura média das mudas (cm) aos 80 dias de idade |
||||||
| R1E1 | R1E2 | R2E1 | R2E2 | R3E1 |
R3E2 |
|
|
26,2 |
24,8 |
25,7 | 19,6 | 22,8 |
19,8 |
|
|
26,0 |
24,6 | 26,3 | 21,1 | 19,4 |
21,4 |
|
|
25,0 |
26,7 | 25,1 |
19,0 |
18,8 |
22,8 |
|
|
25,4 |
25,2 | 26,4 |
18,6 |
19,2 |
21,3 |
|
|
total |
102,6 |
101,3 |
103,5 | 78,3 | 80,2 |
85,3 |
|
média |
25,65 | 25,33 | 25,88 | 19,58 | 20,05 |
21,33 |
Com base no texto e na tabela acima, julgue o item seguinte.
A característica medida é a eficácia do recipiente em produzir mudas.
Provas
The recent drastic development of agriculture,
together with the growing societal interest in agricultural
practices and their consequences, pose a challenge to
agricultural science. There is a need for rethinking the
general methodology of agricultural research. This paper
takes some steps towards developing a systemic research
methodology that can meet this challenge — a general
self-reflexive methodology that forms a basis for doing
holistic or (with a better term) wholeness-oriented research
and provides appropriate criteria of scientific quality. From
a philosophy of research perspective, science is seen as an
interactive learning process with both a cognitive and a
social communicative aspect. This means, first of all, that
science plays a role in the world that it studies. A science that
influences its own subject area, such as agricultural science,
is named a systemic science. From this perspective, there is
a need to reconsider the role of values in science. Science is
not objective in the sense of being value-free. Values play,
and ought to play, an important role in science — not only in
form of constitutive values such as the norms of good
science, but also in the form of contextual values that enter
into the very process of science. This goes against the
traditional criterion of objectivity. Therefore, reflexive
objectivity is suggested as a new criterion for doing good
science, along with the criterion of relevance. Reflexive
objectivity implies that the communication of science must
include the cognitive context, which comprises the societal,
intentional, and observational context.
Internet:www.springerlink.com/(ki41qf55sf3ene3ldnx4vy55)/app/home/contribution.asp?referrer=parent&backto=issue,2,12;journal,15,80;linkingpublicationresults,1:102841,1 (with adaptations).
In the previous text,
“Therefore” (l.23) is synonymous with Although.
Provas
The recent drastic development of agriculture,
together with the growing societal interest in agricultural
practices and their consequences, pose a challenge to
agricultural science. There is a need for rethinking the
general methodology of agricultural research. This paper
takes some steps towards developing a systemic research
methodology that can meet this challenge — a general
self-reflexive methodology that forms a basis for doing
holistic or (with a better term) wholeness-oriented research
and provides appropriate criteria of scientific quality. From
a philosophy of research perspective, science is seen as an
interactive learning process with both a cognitive and a
social communicative aspect. This means, first of all, that
science plays a role in the world that it studies. A science that
influences its own subject area, such as agricultural science,
is named a systemic science. From this perspective, there is
a need to reconsider the role of values in science. Science is
not objective in the sense of being value-free. Values play,
and ought to play, an important role in science — not only in
form of constitutive values such as the norms of good
science, but also in the form of contextual values that enter
into the very process of science. This goes against the
traditional criterion of objectivity. Therefore, reflexive
objectivity is suggested as a new criterion for doing good
science, along with the criterion of relevance. Reflexive
objectivity implies that the communication of science must
include the cognitive context, which comprises the societal,
intentional, and observational context.
Internet:www.springerlink.com/(ki41qf55sf3ene3ldnx4vy55)/app/home/contribution.asp?referrer=parent&backto=issue,2,12;journal,15,80;linkingpublicationresults,1:102841,1 (with adaptations).
In the previous text,
“ought to” (l.19) can be replaced by should.
Provas
The recent drastic development of agriculture,
together with the growing societal interest in agricultural
practices and their consequences, pose a challenge to
agricultural science. There is a need for rethinking the
general methodology of agricultural research. This paper
takes some steps towards developing a systemic research
methodology that can meet this challenge — a general
self-reflexive methodology that forms a basis for doing
holistic or (with a better term) wholeness-oriented research
and provides appropriate criteria of scientific quality. From
a philosophy of research perspective, science is seen as an
interactive learning process with both a cognitive and a
social communicative aspect. This means, first of all, that
science plays a role in the world that it studies. A science that
influences its own subject area, such as agricultural science,
is named a systemic science. From this perspective, there is
a need to reconsider the role of values in science. Science is
not objective in the sense of being value-free. Values play,
and ought to play, an important role in science — not only in
form of constitutive values such as the norms of good
science, but also in the form of contextual values that enter
into the very process of science. This goes against the
traditional criterion of objectivity. Therefore, reflexive
objectivity is suggested as a new criterion for doing good
science, along with the criterion of relevance. Reflexive
objectivity implies that the communication of science must
include the cognitive context, which comprises the societal,
intentional, and observational context.
Internet:www.springerlink.com/(ki41qf55sf3ene3ldnx4vy55)/app/home/contribution.asp?referrer=parent&backto=issue,2,12;journal,15,80;linkingpublicationresults,1:102841,1 (with adaptations).
In the previous text,
“that” (l.7) can be replaced by which.
Provas
The recent drastic development of agriculture,
together with the growing societal interest in agricultural
practices and their consequences, pose a challenge to
agricultural science. There is a need for rethinking the
general methodology of agricultural research. This paper
takes some steps towards developing a systemic research
methodology that can meet this challenge — a general
self-reflexive methodology that forms a basis for doing
holistic or (with a better term) wholeness-oriented research
and provides appropriate criteria of scientific quality. From
a philosophy of research perspective, science is seen as an
interactive learning process with both a cognitive and a
social communicative aspect. This means, first of all, that
science plays a role in the world that it studies. A science that
influences its own subject area, such as agricultural science,
is named a systemic science. From this perspective, there is
a need to reconsider the role of values in science. Science is
not objective in the sense of being value-free. Values play,
and ought to play, an important role in science — not only in
form of constitutive values such as the norms of good
science, but also in the form of contextual values that enter
into the very process of science. This goes against the
traditional criterion of objectivity. Therefore, reflexive
objectivity is suggested as a new criterion for doing good
science, along with the criterion of relevance. Reflexive
objectivity implies that the communication of science must
include the cognitive context, which comprises the societal,
intentional, and observational context.
Internet:www.springerlink.com/(ki41qf55sf3ene3ldnx4vy55)/app/home/contribution.asp?referrer=parent&backto=issue,2,12;journal,15,80;linkingpublicationresults,1:102841,1 (with adaptations).
Based on the text above, judge the following items.
Reflexive objectivity might encompass four contexts.
Provas
The recent drastic development of agriculture,
together with the growing societal interest in agricultural
practices and their consequences, pose a challenge to
agricultural science. There is a need for rethinking the
general methodology of agricultural research. This paper
takes some steps towards developing a systemic research
methodology that can meet this challenge — a general
self-reflexive methodology that forms a basis for doing
holistic or (with a better term) wholeness-oriented research
and provides appropriate criteria of scientific quality. From
a philosophy of research perspective, science is seen as an
interactive learning process with both a cognitive and a
social communicative aspect. This means, first of all, that
science plays a role in the world that it studies. A science that
influences its own subject area, such as agricultural science,
is named a systemic science. From this perspective, there is
a need to reconsider the role of values in science. Science is
not objective in the sense of being value-free. Values play,
and ought to play, an important role in science — not only in
form of constitutive values such as the norms of good
science, but also in the form of contextual values that enter
into the very process of science. This goes against the
traditional criterion of objectivity. Therefore, reflexive
objectivity is suggested as a new criterion for doing good
science, along with the criterion of relevance. Reflexive
objectivity implies that the communication of science must
include the cognitive context, which comprises the societal,
intentional, and observational context.
Internet:www.springerlink.com/(ki41qf55sf3ene3ldnx4vy55)/app/home/contribution.asp?referrer=parent&backto=issue,2,12;journal,15,80;linkingpublicationresults,1:102841,1 (with adaptations).
Based on the text above, judge the following items.
Science must be value-free to be objective, as recommended by its practitioners.
Provas
The recent drastic development of agriculture,
together with the growing societal interest in agricultural
practices and their consequences, pose a challenge to
agricultural science. There is a need for rethinking the
general methodology of agricultural research. This paper
takes some steps towards developing a systemic research
methodology that can meet this challenge — a general
self-reflexive methodology that forms a basis for doing
holistic or (with a better term) wholeness-oriented research
and provides appropriate criteria of scientific quality. From
a philosophy of research perspective, science is seen as an
interactive learning process with both a cognitive and a
social communicative aspect. This means, first of all, that
science plays a role in the world that it studies. A science that
influences its own subject area, such as agricultural science,
is named a systemic science. From this perspective, there is
a need to reconsider the role of values in science. Science is
not objective in the sense of being value-free. Values play,
and ought to play, an important role in science — not only in
form of constitutive values such as the norms of good
science, but also in the form of contextual values that enter
into the very process of science. This goes against the
traditional criterion of objectivity. Therefore, reflexive
objectivity is suggested as a new criterion for doing good
science, along with the criterion of relevance. Reflexive
objectivity implies that the communication of science must
include the cognitive context, which comprises the societal,
intentional, and observational context.
Internet:www.springerlink.com/(ki41qf55sf3ene3ldnx4vy55)/app/home/contribution.asp?referrer=parent&backto=issue,2,12;journal,15,80;linkingpublicationresults,1:102841,1 (with adaptations).
Based on the text above, judge the following items.
Agricultural sciences play a role in its own field of study.
Provas
The recent drastic development of agriculture,
together with the growing societal interest in agricultural
practices and their consequences, pose a challenge to
agricultural science. There is a need for rethinking the
general methodology of agricultural research. This paper
takes some steps towards developing a systemic research
methodology that can meet this challenge — a general
self-reflexive methodology that forms a basis for doing
holistic or (with a better term) wholeness-oriented research
and provides appropriate criteria of scientific quality. From
a philosophy of research perspective, science is seen as an
interactive learning process with both a cognitive and a
social communicative aspect. This means, first of all, that
science plays a role in the world that it studies. A science that
influences its own subject area, such as agricultural science,
is named a systemic science. From this perspective, there is
a need to reconsider the role of values in science. Science is
not objective in the sense of being value-free. Values play,
and ought to play, an important role in science — not only in
form of constitutive values such as the norms of good
science, but also in the form of contextual values that enter
into the very process of science. This goes against the
traditional criterion of objectivity. Therefore, reflexive
objectivity is suggested as a new criterion for doing good
science, along with the criterion of relevance. Reflexive
objectivity implies that the communication of science must
include the cognitive context, which comprises the societal,
intentional, and observational context.
Internet:www.springerlink.com/(ki41qf55sf3ene3ldnx4vy55)/app/home/contribution.asp?referrer=parent&backto=issue,2,12;journal,15,80;linkingpublicationresults,1:102841,1 (with adaptations).
Based on the text above, judge the following items.
Science research perspectives should either be characterized as a cognitive or a social enterprise.
Provas
The recent drastic development of agriculture,
together with the growing societal interest in agricultural
practices and their consequences, pose a challenge to
agricultural science. There is a need for rethinking the
general methodology of agricultural research. This paper
takes some steps towards developing a systemic research
methodology that can meet this challenge — a general
self-reflexive methodology that forms a basis for doing
holistic or (with a better term) wholeness-oriented research
and provides appropriate criteria of scientific quality. From
a philosophy of research perspective, science is seen as an
interactive learning process with both a cognitive and a
social communicative aspect. This means, first of all, that
science plays a role in the world that it studies. A science that
influences its own subject area, such as agricultural science,
is named a systemic science. From this perspective, there is
a need to reconsider the role of values in science. Science is
not objective in the sense of being value-free. Values play,
and ought to play, an important role in science — not only in
form of constitutive values such as the norms of good
science, but also in the form of contextual values that enter
into the very process of science. This goes against the
traditional criterion of objectivity. Therefore, reflexive
objectivity is suggested as a new criterion for doing good
science, along with the criterion of relevance. Reflexive
objectivity implies that the communication of science must
include the cognitive context, which comprises the societal,
intentional, and observational context.
Internet:www.springerlink.com/(ki41qf55sf3ene3ldnx4vy55)/app/home/contribution.asp?referrer=parent&backto=issue,2,12;journal,15,80;linkingpublicationresults,1:102841,1 (with adaptations).
Based on the text above, judge the following items.
It is now advisable to proceed to integrated research work.
Provas
The recent drastic development of agriculture,
together with the growing societal interest in agricultural
practices and their consequences, pose a challenge to
agricultural science. There is a need for rethinking the
general methodology of agricultural research. This paper
takes some steps towards developing a systemic research
methodology that can meet this challenge — a general
self-reflexive methodology that forms a basis for doing
holistic or (with a better term) wholeness-oriented research
and provides appropriate criteria of scientific quality. From
a philosophy of research perspective, science is seen as an
interactive learning process with both a cognitive and a
social communicative aspect. This means, first of all, that
science plays a role in the world that it studies. A science that
influences its own subject area, such as agricultural science,
is named a systemic science. From this perspective, there is
a need to reconsider the role of values in science. Science is
not objective in the sense of being value-free. Values play,
and ought to play, an important role in science — not only in
form of constitutive values such as the norms of good
science, but also in the form of contextual values that enter
into the very process of science. This goes against the
traditional criterion of objectivity. Therefore, reflexive
objectivity is suggested as a new criterion for doing good
science, along with the criterion of relevance. Reflexive
objectivity implies that the communication of science must
include the cognitive context, which comprises the societal,
intentional, and observational context.
Internet:www.springerlink.com/(ki41qf55sf3ene3ldnx4vy55)/app/home/contribution.asp?referrer=parent&backto=issue,2,12;journal,15,80;linkingpublicationresults,1:102841,1 (with adaptations).
Based on the text above, judge the following items.
Dated agricultural methodology is now being reexamined.
Provas
Caderno Container