Foram encontradas 60 questões.
A respeito dos crimes contra a Administração Pública, considere:
I. O funcionário público que obtém vantagem ilícita em proveito próprio e em prejuízo alheio, adquirindo mercadorias em supermercado com cheque sem fundos, comete crime de peculato.
II. O particular pode ser co-autor de crime de concussão praticado por servidor público.
III. O crime de corrupção passiva se consuma no momento da entrega pela vítima ao funcionário público da vantagem indevida solicitada.
Está correto o que consta SOMENTE em
I. O funcionário público que obtém vantagem ilícita em proveito próprio e em prejuízo alheio, adquirindo mercadorias em supermercado com cheque sem fundos, comete crime de peculato.
II. O particular pode ser co-autor de crime de concussão praticado por servidor público.
III. O crime de corrupção passiva se consuma no momento da entrega pela vítima ao funcionário público da vantagem indevida solicitada.
Está correto o que consta SOMENTE em
Provas
Questão presente nas seguintes provas
No tocante ao Controle de Constitucionalidade, o requisito que trata da verificação material da compatibilidade do objeto da lei, ou do ato normativo com a Constituição Federal, é classificado de
Provas
Questão presente nas seguintes provas
- Direitos e Garantias FundamentaisDireitos e Deveres Individuais e ColetivosDireito à Liberdade
- Direitos e Garantias FundamentaisDireitos e Deveres Individuais e ColetivosDireito de Propriedade
- Direitos e Garantias FundamentaisDireitos e Deveres Individuais e ColetivosRemédios ConstitucionaisHabeas Corpus
- Direitos e Garantias FundamentaisDireitos e Deveres Individuais e ColetivosRemédios ConstitucionaisHabeas Data
- Direitos e Garantias FundamentaisDireitos e Deveres Individuais e ColetivosRemédios ConstitucionaisMandado de Injunção
Com relação aos direitos e deveres individuais e coletivos, é correto afirmar que
Provas
Questão presente nas seguintes provas
O Poder Constituinte, que consiste na possibilidade que os Estados-membros têm, em virtude de sua autonomia político-administrativa, de se auto-organizarem por meio de suas respectivas constituições estaduais, sempre respeitando as regras limitativas estabelecidas pela Constituição Federal, é classificado por
Provas
Questão presente nas seguintes provas
No tocante ao Município, considere:
I. Reger-se-á por lei orgânica, votada em dois turnos, com o interstício mínimo de dez dias, e aprovada por dois terços dos membros da Câmara Municipal, que a promulgará.
II. Para a composição das Câmaras Municipais, será observado o limite mínimo de 9 (nove) Vereadores, nos Municípios de até 15.000 (quinze mil) habitantes.
III. Para a composição das Câmaras Municipais, será observado o limite máximo de 23 (vinte e três) Vereadores, nos Municípios com até 600.000 (seiscentos mil) habitantes.
IV. O total da despesa com a remuneração dos Vereadores não poderá ultrapassar o montante de vinte por cento da receita do Município.
Está correto o que consta APENAS em
I. Reger-se-á por lei orgânica, votada em dois turnos, com o interstício mínimo de dez dias, e aprovada por dois terços dos membros da Câmara Municipal, que a promulgará.
II. Para a composição das Câmaras Municipais, será observado o limite mínimo de 9 (nove) Vereadores, nos Municípios de até 15.000 (quinze mil) habitantes.
III. Para a composição das Câmaras Municipais, será observado o limite máximo de 23 (vinte e três) Vereadores, nos Municípios com até 600.000 (seiscentos mil) habitantes.
IV. O total da despesa com a remuneração dos Vereadores não poderá ultrapassar o montante de vinte por cento da receita do Município.
Está correto o que consta APENAS em
Provas
Questão presente nas seguintes provas
Quanto ao ato administrativo, é INCORRETO afirmar:
Provas
Questão presente nas seguintes provas
Em tema de responsabilidade dos servidores públicos, considere:
I. Praticando conduta que configure infração administrativa, que acarrete dano à Administração e seja tipificada como crime, o servidor público estará sujeito às consequências civis, administrativas e penais, pois têm elas fundamento e natureza diversos.
II. Não incide responsabilidade civil, salvo a penal e administrativa, para aquele que exerce, mesmo transitoriamente ou sem remuneração, mandato, cargo ou função em órgão estatal, pela prática de improbidade administrativa.
III. A pena de suspensão significa o não exercício das atribuições funcionais por certo tempo, com percepção dos vencimentos correspondentes ao cargo.
IV. O curso do prazo prescricional para a atuação disciplinar da Administração, interrompe-se na data do conhecimento da autoria da infração e suspende-se com a instauração do processo disciplinar.
V. Toda sanção disciplinar há de estar associada a uma infração, a uma conduta que traduz descumprimento de dever ou inobservância de proibição, de natureza funcional.
É correto o que consta APENAS em
I. Praticando conduta que configure infração administrativa, que acarrete dano à Administração e seja tipificada como crime, o servidor público estará sujeito às consequências civis, administrativas e penais, pois têm elas fundamento e natureza diversos.
II. Não incide responsabilidade civil, salvo a penal e administrativa, para aquele que exerce, mesmo transitoriamente ou sem remuneração, mandato, cargo ou função em órgão estatal, pela prática de improbidade administrativa.
III. A pena de suspensão significa o não exercício das atribuições funcionais por certo tempo, com percepção dos vencimentos correspondentes ao cargo.
IV. O curso do prazo prescricional para a atuação disciplinar da Administração, interrompe-se na data do conhecimento da autoria da infração e suspende-se com a instauração do processo disciplinar.
V. Toda sanção disciplinar há de estar associada a uma infração, a uma conduta que traduz descumprimento de dever ou inobservância de proibição, de natureza funcional.
É correto o que consta APENAS em
Provas
Questão presente nas seguintes provas
A Legislação de Regência das Licitações (8.666/93), estabelece, dentre outras hipóteses, que:
Provas
Questão presente nas seguintes provas
Subways
Posted on Friday March 27th, 2009 by Jebediah Reed
To give some sense of the pace of public works
construction in China, the city of Guangzhou is planning to open
83 miles of new subway lines by the end of next year.
Meanwhile, New York ? a city of about the same size ? has
been playing around with the 1.7-mile Second Avenue line for
decades now. China also builds subways rather cheaply ? $100
million per mile versus $ 2.4 billion per mile in the Big Apple.
Not surprisingly, projects there are more aggressive in all
respects: there are 60 tunnel boring machines operating in
Guangzhou, while only one is slated for the Second Avenue
project; workers put in five 12-hour shifts a week (and if they
don't like it, they can go pound glacial till); and seizing property
is a breeze.
An article in the Business section of today's NY Times
(Clash of Subways and Car Culture in Chinese Cities by Keith
Bradsher) [VERB] a smart look at the forces at play as China
goes on a transit infrastructure spending spree while it
simultaneously becomes evermore sprawling and car-centric.
Here's one interesting passage, [CONJUNCTION] the
story is worth reading in its entirety:
Western mass transit experts applaud China for investing
billions in systems that will put less stress on the environment
and on cities. But they warn that other Chinese policies, like
allowing real estate developers to build sprawling new suburbs,
undermine the benefits of the mass transit boom.
Mr. Chan Shao Zhang , a 67-year-old engineer in charge
of the works in Guangzhou, defended Guangzhou's combination
of cars and subways, saying that the city built a subway line to a new Toyota assembly plant to help employees and suppliers
reach it.
Subways have been most competitive in cities like New
York that have high prices for parking, and tolls for bridges and
tunnels, discouraging car use. Few Chinese cities have been
willing to follow suit, other than Shanghai, which charges a fee of
several thousand dollars for each license plate.
The cost and physical limitations of subways have
discouraged most cities from building new ones. For instance,
only Tokyo has a subway system that carries more people than
its buses. The buses are cheaper and able to serve far more
streets but move more slowly, pollute more and contribute to
traffic congestion.
China has reason to worry. It surpassed the United
States in total vehicle sales for the first time in January, although
the United States remained slightly ahead in car sales. But in
February, China overtook the United States in both, in part
because the global downturn has hurt auto sales much more in
the United States than in China.
There are many countervaling forces ..X.. China has
passed its own stimulus package and the government is eager
to put people to work, create economic activity, and build
modern infrastructure. The Guangzhou project is part of major
national transit buildout. But the nation's cities are also sprawling
beasts, and in that sense, more suited to cars than trains. Not
shockingly, many Chinese prefer the former.
(Adapted from http://www.infrastructurist.com/2009/03/27/-
building-a-subway-is-96-percent-cheaper-in-china/)
De acordo com o texto,Posted on Friday March 27th, 2009 by Jebediah Reed
To give some sense of the pace of public works
construction in China, the city of Guangzhou is planning to open
83 miles of new subway lines by the end of next year.
Meanwhile, New York ? a city of about the same size ? has
been playing around with the 1.7-mile Second Avenue line for
decades now. China also builds subways rather cheaply ? $100
million per mile versus $ 2.4 billion per mile in the Big Apple.
Not surprisingly, projects there are more aggressive in all
respects: there are 60 tunnel boring machines operating in
Guangzhou, while only one is slated for the Second Avenue
project; workers put in five 12-hour shifts a week (and if they
don't like it, they can go pound glacial till); and seizing property
is a breeze.
An article in the Business section of today's NY Times
(Clash of Subways and Car Culture in Chinese Cities by Keith
Bradsher) [VERB] a smart look at the forces at play as China
goes on a transit infrastructure spending spree while it
simultaneously becomes evermore sprawling and car-centric.
Here's one interesting passage, [CONJUNCTION] the
story is worth reading in its entirety:
Western mass transit experts applaud China for investing
billions in systems that will put less stress on the environment
and on cities. But they warn that other Chinese policies, like
allowing real estate developers to build sprawling new suburbs,
undermine the benefits of the mass transit boom.
Mr. Chan Shao Zhang , a 67-year-old engineer in charge
of the works in Guangzhou, defended Guangzhou's combination
of cars and subways, saying that the city built a subway line to a new Toyota assembly plant to help employees and suppliers
reach it.
Subways have been most competitive in cities like New
York that have high prices for parking, and tolls for bridges and
tunnels, discouraging car use. Few Chinese cities have been
willing to follow suit, other than Shanghai, which charges a fee of
several thousand dollars for each license plate.
The cost and physical limitations of subways have
discouraged most cities from building new ones. For instance,
only Tokyo has a subway system that carries more people than
its buses. The buses are cheaper and able to serve far more
streets but move more slowly, pollute more and contribute to
traffic congestion.
China has reason to worry. It surpassed the United
States in total vehicle sales for the first time in January, although
the United States remained slightly ahead in car sales. But in
February, China overtook the United States in both, in part
because the global downturn has hurt auto sales much more in
the United States than in China.
There are many countervaling forces ..X.. China has
passed its own stimulus package and the government is eager
to put people to work, create economic activity, and build
modern infrastructure. The Guangzhou project is part of major
national transit buildout. But the nation's cities are also sprawling
beasts, and in that sense, more suited to cars than trains. Not
shockingly, many Chinese prefer the former.
(Adapted from http://www.infrastructurist.com/2009/03/27/-
building-a-subway-is-96-percent-cheaper-in-china/)
Provas
Questão presente nas seguintes provas
Subways
Posted on Friday March 27th, 2009 by Jebediah Reed
To give some sense of the pace of public works
construction in China, the city of Guangzhou is planning to open
83 miles of new subway lines by the end of next year.
Meanwhile, New York ? a city of about the same size ? has
been playing around with the 1.7-mile Second Avenue line for
decades now. China also builds subways rather cheaply ? $100
million per mile versus $ 2.4 billion per mile in the Big Apple.
Not surprisingly, projects there are more aggressive in all
respects: there are 60 tunnel boring machines operating in
Guangzhou, while only one is slated for the Second Avenue
project; workers put in five 12-hour shifts a week (and if they
don't like it, they can go pound glacial till); and seizing property
is a breeze.
An article in the Business section of today's NY Times
(Clash of Subways and Car Culture in Chinese Cities by Keith
Bradsher) [VERB] a smart look at the forces at play as China
goes on a transit infrastructure spending spree while it
simultaneously becomes evermore sprawling and car-centric.
Here's one interesting passage, [CONJUNCTION] the
story is worth reading in its entirety:
Western mass transit experts applaud China for investing
billions in systems that will put less stress on the environment
and on cities. But they warn that other Chinese policies, like
allowing real estate developers to build sprawling new suburbs,
undermine the benefits of the mass transit boom.
Mr. Chan Shao Zhang , a 67-year-old engineer in charge
of the works in Guangzhou, defended Guangzhou's combination
of cars and subways, saying that the city built a subway line to a new Toyota assembly plant to help employees and suppliers
reach it.
Subways have been most competitive in cities like New
York that have high prices for parking, and tolls for bridges and
tunnels, discouraging car use. Few Chinese cities have been
willing to follow suit, other than Shanghai, which charges a fee of
several thousand dollars for each license plate.
The cost and physical limitations of subways have
discouraged most cities from building new ones. For instance,
only Tokyo has a subway system that carries more people than
its buses. The buses are cheaper and able to serve far more
streets but move more slowly, pollute more and contribute to
traffic congestion.
China has reason to worry. It surpassed the United
States in total vehicle sales for the first time in January, although
the United States remained slightly ahead in car sales. But in
February, China overtook the United States in both, in part
because the global downturn has hurt auto sales much more in
the United States than in China.
There are many countervaling forces ..X.. China has
passed its own stimulus package and the government is eager
to put people to work, create economic activity, and build
modern infrastructure. The Guangzhou project is part of major
national transit buildout. But the nation's cities are also sprawling
beasts, and in that sense, more suited to cars than trains. Not
shockingly, many Chinese prefer the former.
(Adapted from http://www.infrastructurist.com/2009/03/27/-
building-a-subway-is-96-percent-cheaper-in-china/)
The expression that correctly fills the blank ..x.. at the end of the text isPosted on Friday March 27th, 2009 by Jebediah Reed
To give some sense of the pace of public works
construction in China, the city of Guangzhou is planning to open
83 miles of new subway lines by the end of next year.
Meanwhile, New York ? a city of about the same size ? has
been playing around with the 1.7-mile Second Avenue line for
decades now. China also builds subways rather cheaply ? $100
million per mile versus $ 2.4 billion per mile in the Big Apple.
Not surprisingly, projects there are more aggressive in all
respects: there are 60 tunnel boring machines operating in
Guangzhou, while only one is slated for the Second Avenue
project; workers put in five 12-hour shifts a week (and if they
don't like it, they can go pound glacial till); and seizing property
is a breeze.
An article in the Business section of today's NY Times
(Clash of Subways and Car Culture in Chinese Cities by Keith
Bradsher) [VERB] a smart look at the forces at play as China
goes on a transit infrastructure spending spree while it
simultaneously becomes evermore sprawling and car-centric.
Here's one interesting passage, [CONJUNCTION] the
story is worth reading in its entirety:
Western mass transit experts applaud China for investing
billions in systems that will put less stress on the environment
and on cities. But they warn that other Chinese policies, like
allowing real estate developers to build sprawling new suburbs,
undermine the benefits of the mass transit boom.
Mr. Chan Shao Zhang , a 67-year-old engineer in charge
of the works in Guangzhou, defended Guangzhou's combination
of cars and subways, saying that the city built a subway line to a new Toyota assembly plant to help employees and suppliers
reach it.
Subways have been most competitive in cities like New
York that have high prices for parking, and tolls for bridges and
tunnels, discouraging car use. Few Chinese cities have been
willing to follow suit, other than Shanghai, which charges a fee of
several thousand dollars for each license plate.
The cost and physical limitations of subways have
discouraged most cities from building new ones. For instance,
only Tokyo has a subway system that carries more people than
its buses. The buses are cheaper and able to serve far more
streets but move more slowly, pollute more and contribute to
traffic congestion.
China has reason to worry. It surpassed the United
States in total vehicle sales for the first time in January, although
the United States remained slightly ahead in car sales. But in
February, China overtook the United States in both, in part
because the global downturn has hurt auto sales much more in
the United States than in China.
There are many countervaling forces ..X.. China has
passed its own stimulus package and the government is eager
to put people to work, create economic activity, and build
modern infrastructure. The Guangzhou project is part of major
national transit buildout. But the nation's cities are also sprawling
beasts, and in that sense, more suited to cars than trains. Not
shockingly, many Chinese prefer the former.
(Adapted from http://www.infrastructurist.com/2009/03/27/-
building-a-subway-is-96-percent-cheaper-in-china/)
Provas
Questão presente nas seguintes provas
Cadernos
Caderno Container