1. Based on the text below answer questions 19 to 29.

The wrong way to teach grammar (Part II)

Michelle Navarre Cleary

These students are victims of the mistaken belief that grammar lessons must come before writing, rather than grammar being something that is best learned through writing. I saw the high cost of this phenomenon firsthand at the urban community college where I taught writing for eight years, an institution where more than 90 percent of students failed to complete a twoyear degree within three years. A primary culprit: the required developmental writing classes that focused on traditional grammar instruction. Again and again, I witnessed aspiration gave way to discouragement. In this sevencollege system, some 80 percent of the students test into such classes where they can spend up to a year before being asked to write more than a paragraph. Nationally, over half of university and college students in developmental classes drop out before going any further. Essentially, they leave before having begun college.

Happily, there are solutions. Just as we teach children how to ride bikes by putting them on a bicycle, we need to teach students how to write grammatically by letting them write. Once students get ideas they care about onto the page, they are ready for instruction including grammar instruction that will help communicate those ideas. We know that grammar instruction that works includes teaching students strategies for revising and editing, providing targeted lessons on problems that students immediately apply to their own writing, and having students play with sentences like Legos, combining basic sentences into more complex ones. Often, surprisingly little formal grammar instruction is needed. Researcher Marcia Hurlow has shown that many errors “disappear” from student writing when students focus on their ideas and stop “trying to ‘sound correct.’”

There are also less immediately apparent costs to having generations of learners who associate writing only with correctness. Invariably, when people learn that I teach writing, they offer their “grammar confessions.” Sheepishly, they tell me that they “never really learned grammar,” and sadly, it also often comes out that they avoid writing. I have interviewed an executive who locked herself in her office and called her son when she had to write reports, and I have had parents describe writing their child’s paper because the kid was paralyzed with writing anxiety. I have even had people tell me that they passed up job opportunities because they required writing.

Adapted from: http://www.theatlantic.com/education/archive/2014/02/thewrongwaytoteachgrammar/284014/. Acessed on 02/08/2014.

1. Based on the text below answer questions 11 to 18.

The wrong way to teach grammar (Part I)

Michelle Navarre Cleary

A century of research shows that traditional grammar lessons those hours spent diagramming sentences and memorizing parts of speech don’t help and may even hinder students’ efforts to become better writers. Yes, they need to learn grammar, but the oldfashioned way does not work.

This finding is consistent among students of all ages, from elementary school through college. For example, one wellregarded study followed three groups of students from 9th to 11th grade where one group had traditional rulebound lessons, a second received an alternative approach to grammar instruction, and a third received no grammar lessons at all, just more literature and creative writing. The result: No significant differences among the three groups except that both grammar groups emerged with a strong antipathy to English.

There is a real cost to ignoring such findings. In my work with adults who dropped out of school before earning a college degree, I have found over and over again that they overedit themselves from the moment they sit down to write. They report thoughts like “Is this right? Is that right?” and “Oh my god, if I write a contraction, I’m going to flunk.” Focused on being correct, they never give themselves a chance to explore their ideas or ways of expressing those ideas. Significantly, this sometimes debilitating focus on “the rules” can be found in students who attended elite private institutions as well as those from resourcestrapped public schools.

We need to teach students how to write grammatically by letting them write.

(…)

Adapted from: http://www.theatlantic.com/education/archive/2014/02/thewrongwaytoteachgrammar/284014/. Acessed on 02/08/2014.

1. Based on the text below answer questions 11 to 18.

The wrong way to teach grammar (Part I)

Michelle Navarre Cleary

A century of research shows that traditional grammar lessons those hours spent diagramming sentences and memorizing parts of speech don’t help and may even hinder students’ efforts to become better writers. Yes, they need to learn grammar, but the oldfashioned way does not work.

This finding is consistent among students of all ages, from elementary school through college. For example, one wellregarded study followed three groups of students from 9th to 11th grade where one group had traditional rulebound lessons, a second received an alternative approach to grammar instruction, and a third received no grammar lessons at all, just more literature and creative writing. The result: No significant differences among the three groups except that both grammar groups emerged with a strong antipathy to English.

There is a real cost to ignoring such findings. In my work with adults who dropped out of school before earning a college degree, I have found over and over again that they overedit themselves from the moment they sit down to write. They report thoughts like “Is this right? Is that right?” and “Oh my god, if I write a contraction, I’m going to flunk.” Focused on being correct, they never give themselves a chance to explore their ideas or ways of expressing those ideas. Significantly, this sometimes debilitating focus on “the rules” can be found in students who attended elite private institutions as well as those from resourcestrapped public schools.

We need to teach students how to write grammatically by letting them write.

(…)

Adapted from: http://www.theatlantic.com/education/archive/2014/02/thewrongwaytoteachgrammar/284014/. Acessed on 02/08/2014.

1. Based on the text below answer questions 11 to 18.

The wrong way to teach grammar (Part I)

Michelle Navarre Cleary

A century of research shows that traditional grammar lessons those hours spent diagramming sentences and memorizing parts of speech don’t help and may even hinder students’ efforts to become better writers. Yes, they need to learn grammar, but the oldfashioned way does not work.

This finding is consistent among students of all ages, from elementary school through college. For example, one wellregarded study followed three groups of students from 9th to 11th grade where one group had traditional rulebound lessons, a second received an alternative approach to grammar instruction, and a third received no grammar lessons at all, just more literature and creative writing. The result: No significant differences among the three groups except that both grammar groups emerged with a strong antipathy to English.

There is a real cost to ignoring such findings. In my work with adults who dropped out of school before earning a college degree, I have found over and over again that they overedit themselves from the moment they sit down to write. They report thoughts like “Is this right? Is that right?” and “Oh my god, if I write a contraction, I’m going to flunk.” Focused on being correct, they never give themselves a chance to explore their ideas or ways of expressing those ideas. Significantly, this sometimes debilitating focus on “the rules” can be found in students who attended elite private institutions as well as those from resourcestrapped public schools.

We need to teach students how to write grammatically by letting them write.

(…)

Adapted from: http://www.theatlantic.com/education/archive/2014/02/thewrongwaytoteachgrammar/284014/. Acessed on 02/08/2014.

1. Based on the text below answer questions 11 to 18.

The wrong way to teach grammar (Part I)

Michelle Navarre Cleary

A century of research shows that traditional grammar lessons those hours spent diagramming sentences and memorizing parts of speech don’t help and may even hinder students’ efforts to become better writers. Yes, they need to learn grammar, but the oldfashioned way does not work.

This finding is consistent among students of all ages, from elementary school through college. For example, one wellregarded study followed three groups of students from 9th to 11th grade where one group had traditional rulebound lessons, a second received an alternative approach to grammar instruction, and a third received no grammar lessons at all, just more literature and creative writing. The result: No significant differences among the three groups except that both grammar groups emerged with a strong antipathy to English.

There is a real cost to ignoring such findings. In my work with adults who dropped out of school before earning a college degree, I have found over and over again that they overedit themselves from the moment they sit down to write. They report thoughts like “Is this right? Is that right?” and “Oh my god, if I write a contraction, I’m going to flunk.” Focused on being correct, they never give themselves a chance to explore their ideas or ways of expressing those ideas. Significantly, this sometimes debilitating focus on “the rules” can be found in students who attended elite private institutions as well as those from resourcestrapped public schools.

We need to teach students how to write grammatically by letting them write.

(…)

Adapted from: http://www.theatlantic.com/education/archive/2014/02/thewrongwaytoteachgrammar/284014/. Acessed on 02/08/2014.

1. Based on the text below answer questions 11 to 18.

The wrong way to teach grammar (Part I)

Michelle Navarre Cleary

A century of research shows that traditional grammar lessons those hours spent diagramming sentences and memorizing parts of speech don’t help and may even hinder students’ efforts to become better writers. Yes, they need to learn grammar, but the oldfashioned way does not work.

This finding is consistent among students of all ages, from elementary school through college. For example, one wellregarded study followed three groups of students from 9th to 11th grade where one group had traditional rulebound lessons, a second received an alternative approach to grammar instruction, and a third received no grammar lessons at all, just more literature and creative writing. The result: No significant differences among the three groups except that both grammar groups emerged with a strong antipathy to English.

There is a real cost to ignoring such findings. In my work with adults who dropped out of school before earning a college degree, I have found over and over again that they overedit themselves from the moment they sit down to write. They report thoughts like “Is this right? Is that right?” and “Oh my god, if I write a contraction, I’m going to flunk.” Focused on being correct, they never give themselves a chance to explore their ideas or ways of expressing those ideas. Significantly, this sometimes debilitating focus on “the rules” can be found in students who attended elite private institutions as well as those from resourcestrapped public schools.

We need to teach students how to write grammatically by letting them write.

(…)

Adapted from: http://www.theatlantic.com/education/archive/2014/02/thewrongwaytoteachgrammar/284014/. Acessed on 02/08/2014.

1. Based on the text below answer questions 11 to 18.

The wrong way to teach grammar (Part I)

Michelle Navarre Cleary

A century of research shows that traditional grammar lessons those hours spent diagramming sentences and memorizing parts of speech don’t help and may even hinder students’ efforts to become better writers. Yes, they need to learn grammar, but the oldfashioned way does not work.

This finding is consistent among students of all ages, from elementary school through college. For example, one wellregarded study followed three groups of students from 9th to 11th grade where one group had traditional rulebound lessons, a second received an alternative approach to grammar instruction, and a third received no grammar lessons at all, just more literature and creative writing. The result: No significant differences among the three groups except that both grammar groups emerged with a strong antipathy to English.

There is a real cost to ignoring such findings. In my work with adults who dropped out of school before earning a college degree, I have found over and over again that they overedit themselves from the moment they sit down to write. They report thoughts like “Is this right? Is that right?” and “Oh my god, if I write a contraction, I’m going to flunk.” Focused on being correct, they never give themselves a chance to explore their ideas or ways of expressing those ideas. Significantly, this sometimes debilitating focus on “the rules” can be found in students who attended elite private institutions as well as those from resourcestrapped public schools.

We need to teach students how to write grammatically by letting them write.

(…)

Adapted from: http://www.theatlantic.com/education/archive/2014/02/thewrongwaytoteachgrammar/284014/. Acessed on 02/08/2014.

1. Based on the text below answer questions 11 to 18.

The wrong way to teach grammar (Part I)

Michelle Navarre Cleary

A century of research shows that traditional grammar lessons those hours spent diagramming sentences and memorizing parts of speech don’t help and may even hinder students’ efforts to become better writers. Yes, they need to learn grammar, but the oldfashioned way does not work.

This finding is consistent among students of all ages, from elementary school through college. For example, one wellregarded study followed three groups of students from 9th to 11th grade where one group had traditional rulebound lessons, a second received an alternative approach to grammar instruction, and a third received no grammar lessons at all, just more literature and creative writing. The result: No significant differences among the three groups except that both grammar groups emerged with a strong antipathy to English.

There is a real cost to ignoring such findings. In my work with adults who dropped out of school before earning a college degree, I have found over and over again that they overedit themselves from the moment they sit down to write. They report thoughts like “Is this right? Is that right?” and “Oh my god, if I write a contraction, I’m going to flunk.” Focused on being correct, they never give themselves a chance to explore their ideas or ways of expressing those ideas. Significantly, this sometimes debilitating focus on “the rules” can be found in students who attended elite private institutions as well as those from resourcestrapped public schools.

We need to teach students how to write grammatically by letting them write.

(…)

Adapted from: http://www.theatlantic.com/education/archive/2014/02/thewrongwaytoteachgrammar/284014/. Acessed on 02/08/2014.

1. Based on the text below answer questions 11 to 18.

The wrong way to teach grammar (Part I)

Michelle Navarre Cleary

A century of research shows that traditional grammar lessons those hours spent diagramming sentences and memorizing parts of speech don’t help and may even hinder students’ efforts to become better writers. Yes, they need to learn grammar, but the oldfashioned way does not work.

This finding is consistent among students of all ages, from elementary school through college. For example, one wellregarded study followed three groups of students from 9th to 11th grade where one group had traditional rulebound lessons, a second received an alternative approach to grammar instruction, and a third received no grammar lessons at all, just more literature and creative writing. The result: No significant differences among the three groups except that both grammar groups emerged with a strong antipathy to English.

There is a real cost to ignoring such findings. In my work with adults who dropped out of school before earning a college degree, I have found over and over again that they overedit themselves from the moment they sit down to write. They report thoughts like “Is this right? Is that right?” and “Oh my god, if I write a contraction, I’m going to flunk.” Focused on being correct, they never give themselves a chance to explore their ideas or ways of expressing those ideas. Significantly, this sometimes debilitating focus on “the rules” can be found in students who attended elite private institutions as well as those from resourcestrapped public schools.

We need to teach students how to write grammatically by letting them write.

(…)

Adapted from: http://www.theatlantic.com/education/archive/2014/02/thewrongwaytoteachgrammar/284014/. Acessed on 02/08/2014.