Foram encontradas 410 questões.
| empresa licitante | pontuação técnica | pontuação de preço | pontuação final |
| X | 60 | 20 | 80 |
| Y | 60 | 30 | 90 |
| Z | 50 | 40 | 90 |
| W | 40 | x | desclassificada |
Nessa tabela, consta o resultado final do processo de licitação pelo tipo técnica e preço para elaboração de um projeto de engenharia, em que a pontuação técnica mínima exigida das empresas era de 50 pontos. A partir das informações da tabela, julgue o item subsecutivo de acordo com o disposto na Lei n.º 8.666/1993.
Como as propostas das empresas Y e Z estão empatadas, o critério de desempate é a maior pontuação técnica, sendo vencedora a proposta Y.
Provas
Questão presente nas seguintes provas
Julgue o item subsequente de acordo com a Instrução Normativa n.º 4/2014 do MPOG/SLTI.
Para resguardar a organização contratante, deve constar do edital a informação de que a contratada já dispõe de funcionários capacitados para a realização do serviço contratado.
Provas
Questão presente nas seguintes provas
Text CB3A1AAA
Like humans, computers can team up with their peers to achieve results that none of them could obtain alone; unlike humans, they can do many activities at once, and do all of them well. In spite of that, passé debates on this issue have implicitly assumed that computation is mostly sequential — proceeds along a single thread of control. Software developers should now realize that this assumption no longer holds, as we move to concurrent (also known as parallel) computation.
Concurrency is not a new subject, but for a long time interest in it remained confined to four application areas: operating systems, networking, implementation of database management systems, and high-speed scientific software. Although strategic and prestigious, these tasks involve only a small subset of the software development community. Things have changed. Concurrency is quickly becoming a required component of just about every type of application, including some that had traditionally been thought of as fundamentally sequential in nature.
This advancement gives particular urgency to the study and review of various forms of concurrency; the evolution of Computer Science requires software developers to make concurrency part of their mindset. And it is not simply the traditional concepts of multiprocessing and multiprogramming, the past few years have introduced state-of-the-art technologies, such as remote execution through the Net.
Bertrand Meyer. Concurrency, distribution, client-server and the Internet.
In: Object-oriented software construction. 2th ed. New Jersey: Prentice Hall PTR, 2009, p. 951-3 (adapted).
In the text CB3A1AAA,
“state-of-the-art technologies” are advanced technologies, developed with an artistic touch.
Provas
Questão presente nas seguintes provas
Text CB3A1AAA
Like humans, computers can team up with their peers to achieve results that none of them could obtain alone; unlike humans, they can do many activities at once, and do all of them well. In spite of that, passé debates on this issue have implicitly assumed that computation is mostly sequential — proceeds along a single thread of control. Software developers should now realize that this assumption no longer holds, as we move to concurrent (also known as parallel) computation.
Concurrency is not a new subject, but for a long time interest in it remained confined to four application areas: operating systems, networking, implementation of database management systems, and high-speed scientific software. Although strategic and prestigious, these tasks involve only a small subset of the software development community. Things have changed. Concurrency is quickly becoming a required component of just about every type of application, including some that had traditionally been thought of as fundamentally sequential in nature.
This advancement gives particular urgency to the study and review of various forms of concurrency; the evolution of Computer Science requires software developers to make concurrency part of their mindset. And it is not simply the traditional concepts of multiprocessing and multiprogramming, the past few years have introduced state-of-the-art technologies, such as remote execution through the Net.
Bertrand Meyer. Concurrency, distribution, client-server and the Internet.
In: Object-oriented software construction. 2th ed. New Jersey: Prentice Hall PTR, 2009, p. 951-3 (adapted).
In the text CB3A1AAA,
the verb “realize” can be replaced by accomplish without any change in the meaning of the sentence.
Provas
Questão presente nas seguintes provas
Text CB3A1AAA
Like humans, computers can team up with their peers to achieve results that none of them could obtain alone; unlike humans, they can do many activities at once, and do all of them well. In spite of that, passé debates on this issue have implicitly assumed that computation is mostly sequential — proceeds along a single thread of control. Software developers should now realize that this assumption no longer holds, as we move to concurrent (also known as parallel) computation.
Concurrency is not a new subject, but for a long time interest in it remained confined to four application areas: operating systems, networking, implementation of database management systems, and high-speed scientific software. Although strategic and prestigious, these tasks involve only a small subset of the software development community. Things have changed. Concurrency is quickly becoming a required component of just about every type of application, including some that had traditionally been thought of as fundamentally sequential in nature.
This advancement gives particular urgency to the study and review of various forms of concurrency; the evolution of Computer Science requires software developers to make concurrency part of their mindset. And it is not simply the traditional concepts of multiprocessing and multiprogramming, the past few years have introduced state-of-the-art technologies, such as remote execution through the Net.
Bertrand Meyer. Concurrency, distribution, client-server and the Internet.
In: Object-oriented software construction. 2th ed. New Jersey: Prentice Hall PTR, 2009, p. 951-3 (adapted).
Judge the following item according to the text CB3A1AAA.
The author of the text claims that concurrent computation is an outdated issue.
Provas
Questão presente nas seguintes provas
Text CB3A1AAA
Like humans, computers can team up with their peers to achieve results that none of them could obtain alone; unlike humans, they can do many activities at once, and do all of them well. In spite of that, passé debates on this issue have implicitly assumed that computation is mostly sequential — proceeds along a single thread of control. Software developers should now realize that this assumption no longer holds, as we move to concurrent (also known as parallel) computation.
Concurrency is not a new subject, but for a long time interest in it remained confined to four application areas: operating systems, networking, implementation of database management systems, and high-speed scientific software. Although strategic and prestigious, these tasks involve only a small subset of the software development community. Things have changed. Concurrency is quickly becoming a required component of just about every type of application, including some that had traditionally been thought of as fundamentally sequential in nature.
This advancement gives particular urgency to the study and review of various forms of concurrency; the evolution of Computer Science requires software developers to make concurrency part of their mindset. And it is not simply the traditional concepts of multiprocessing and multiprogramming, the past few years have introduced state-of-the-art technologies, such as remote execution through the Net.
Bertrand Meyer. Concurrency, distribution, client-server and the Internet.
In: Object-oriented software construction. 2th ed. New Jersey: Prentice Hall PTR, 2009, p. 951-3 (adapted).
Judge the following item according to the text CB3A1AAA.
In spite of being a longstanding matter, concurrent computation has been used just by professionals who implement database management systems.
Provas
Questão presente nas seguintes provas
Text CB3A1AAA
Like humans, computers can team up with their peers to achieve results that none of them could obtain alone; unlike humans, they can do many activities at once, and do all of them well. In spite of that, passé debates on this issue have implicitly assumed that computation is mostly sequential — proceeds along a single thread of control. Software developers should now realize that this assumption no longer holds, as we move to concurrent (also known as parallel) computation.
Concurrency is not a new subject, but for a long time interest in it remained confined to four application areas: operating systems, networking, implementation of database management systems, and high-speed scientific software. Although strategic and prestigious, these tasks involve only a small subset of the software development community. Things have changed. Concurrency is quickly becoming a required component of just about every type of application, including some that had traditionally been thought of as fundamentally sequential in nature.
This advancement gives particular urgency to the study and review of various forms of concurrency; the evolution of Computer Science requires software developers to make concurrency part of their mindset. And it is not simply the traditional concepts of multiprocessing and multiprogramming, the past few years have introduced state-of-the-art technologies, such as remote execution through the Net.
Bertrand Meyer. Concurrency, distribution, client-server and the Internet.
In: Object-oriented software construction. 2th ed. New Jersey: Prentice Hall PTR, 2009, p. 951-3 (adapted).
Judge the following item according to the text CB3A1AAA.
Software construction professionals must be acquainted with concurrency quickly.
Provas
Questão presente nas seguintes provas
Text CB3A1AAA
Like humans, computers can team up with their peers to achieve results that none of them could obtain alone; unlike humans, they can do many activities at once, and do all of them well. In spite of that, passé debates on this issue have implicitly assumed that computation is mostly sequential — proceeds along a single thread of control. Software developers should now realize that this assumption no longer holds, as we move to concurrent (also known as parallel) computation.
Concurrency is not a new subject, but for a long time interest in it remained confined to four application areas: operating systems, networking, implementation of database management systems, and high-speed scientific software. Although strategic and prestigious, these tasks involve only a small subset of the software development community. Things have changed. Concurrency is quickly becoming a required component of just about every type of application, including some that had traditionally been thought of as fundamentally sequential in nature.
This advancement gives particular urgency to the study and review of various forms of concurrency; the evolution of Computer Science requires software developers to make concurrency part of their mindset. And it is not simply the traditional concepts of multiprocessing and multiprogramming, the past few years have introduced state-of-the-art technologies, such as remote execution through the Net.
Bertrand Meyer. Concurrency, distribution, client-server and the Internet.
In: Object-oriented software construction. 2th ed. New Jersey: Prentice Hall PTR, 2009, p. 951-3 (adapted).
Judge the following item according to the text CB3A1AAA.
Even some applications once seen as sequential are now demanding concurrent computation.
Provas
Questão presente nas seguintes provas
2297017
Ano: 2016
Disciplina: Engenharia Ambiental e Sanitária
Banca: CESPE / CEBRASPE
Orgão: TCE-SC
Disciplina: Engenharia Ambiental e Sanitária
Banca: CESPE / CEBRASPE
Orgão: TCE-SC
Ao receber uma obra de rede coletora de esgotos, o responsável pela fiscalização observou que o trecho entre os poços de visita (PVs) 25 e 29 de um coletor tronco apresentava os seguintes dados cadastrais.
| trecho | diâmetro (mm) | extensão (m) | cota do terreno (m) | cota do coletor (m) | ||
| montante | jusante | montante | jusante | |||
| 25–26 | 300 | 62,00 | 101,235 | 100,925 | 99,135 | 98,825 |
| 26–27 | 300 | 65,00 | 100,925 | 101,016 | 98,725 | 98,666 |
| 27–28 | 400 | 85,00 | 101,016 | 101,544 | 98,666 | 98,724 |
| 28–29 | 400 | 76,00 | 101,544 | 101,232 | 98,724 | 98,183 |
Para o cálculo do volume de escavação, adotou-se como critério considerar uma seção retangular em toda a rede, com largura equivalente a quatro vezes o diâmetro da tubulação, e com altura equivalente à diferença entre a cota do terreno e a cota inferior do coletor.
Com base na situação hipotética e na tabela apresentadas, julgue o item que se segue.
A declividade invertida do trecho 27–28 não prejudicará o escoamento dos esgotos desde que a declividade média de todo o coletor tronco proporcione a tensão trativa necessária.
Provas
Questão presente nas seguintes provas
2297016
Ano: 2016
Disciplina: Engenharia Ambiental e Sanitária
Banca: CESPE / CEBRASPE
Orgão: TCE-SC
Disciplina: Engenharia Ambiental e Sanitária
Banca: CESPE / CEBRASPE
Orgão: TCE-SC
Ao receber uma obra de rede coletora de esgotos, o responsável pela fiscalização observou que o trecho entre os poços de visita (PVs) 25 e 29 de um coletor tronco apresentava os seguintes dados cadastrais.
| trecho | diâmetro (mm) | extensão (m) | cota do terreno (m) | cota do coletor (m) | ||
| montante | jusante | montante | jusante | |||
| 25–26 | 300 | 62,00 | 101,235 | 100,925 | 99,135 | 98,825 |
| 26–27 | 300 | 65,00 | 100,925 | 101,016 | 98,725 | 98,666 |
| 27–28 | 400 | 85,00 | 101,016 | 101,544 | 98,666 | 98,724 |
| 28–29 | 400 | 76,00 | 101,544 | 101,232 | 98,724 | 98,183 |
Para o cálculo do volume de escavação, adotou-se como critério considerar uma seção retangular em toda a rede, com largura equivalente a quatro vezes o diâmetro da tubulação, e com altura equivalente à diferença entre a cota do terreno e a cota inferior do coletor.
Com base na situação hipotética e na tabela apresentadas, julgue o item que se segue.
No trecho da rede compreendido entre os PVs 25 e 26, o volume de escavação a ser medido na obra é de 262 m³.
Provas
Questão presente nas seguintes provas
Cadernos
Caderno Container