Magna Concursos

Foram encontradas 70 questões.

3269774 Ano: 2024
Disciplina: Inglês (Língua Inglesa)
Banca: CESGRANRIO
Orgão: CPNU/CNU
Provas:

Brazil: Online Learning Tools Harvest Children’s Data

1 “Educational websites directed at Brazilian students, including two created by state education secretariats, monitored children and collected their personal data”, Human Rights Watch said today. “The national government should revise Brazil’s data protection law by adding new safeguards to protect children online”.

2 Analysis conducted by Human Rights Watch in November 2022 and reviewed again in January 2023 found that seven educational websites extracted and sent children’s data to third-party companies, using tracking technologies designed for advertising. These websites not only watched children inside of their online classrooms, but followed them across the internet, outside school hours, and deep into their private lives.

3 “Children and their families in Brazil are being kept in the dark about the data monitoring conducted on children in online classrooms,” said Hye Jung Han, children’s rights and technology researcher and advocate at Human Rights Watch. “Instead of protecting children, state governments have willfully enabled anyone to monitor them and collect their personal information online.”

4 Human Rights Watch found that five websites deployed particularly intrusive tracking techniques to invisibly spy on children in ways that were impossible to avoid or protect against. One of these websites uses session recording, a technique that allows a third party to watch and record a user’s behavior on a webpage. That includes mouse clicks and movements around a webpage; the digital equivalent of logging video monitoring each time a child scratches their nose or grasps their pencil in class. Typically, the third party would then scrutinize the data on behalf of the website to guess a user’s personality, their preferences, and what they are likely to do next, or how they might be influenced. Advertisers might use these insights to target the child with personalized content and ads that follow them across the internet.

5 Profiling, targeting, and advertising to children in this way infringes on their privacy, as it is neither proportionate nor necessary for these websites to function or deliver educational content. It also risks violating children’s other rights if this information is used to guide them toward outcomes that are harmful or not in their best interest. Such practices also play an enormous role in shaping children’s online experiences and determining the information they see, at a time in their lives when their opinions and beliefs are at high risk of manipulative interference.

6 Brazil’s data protection authority should stop these assaults on children’s privacy. It should require these companies and state governments to delete children’s data collected, and prevent them from further using children’s data for any purpose unrelated to providing education.

7 Brazil’s constitution protects the right to privacy. The country has also ratified the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child, which entitles children to special protections that guard their privacy. Brazil’s data protection law, however, – the Lei Geral de Proteção de Dados Pessoais, or the General Personal Data Protection Law – does not provide sufficient protections for children. It does not explicitly prohibit actors from exploiting children’s information or require them to provide high levels of safety and security for children. Lawmakers should amend the law to establish comprehensive child data protection rules, including bans on behavioral advertising and the use of intrusive tracking techniques on children. These rules should also require all actors offering online services to children – including online learning – to provide the highest levels of protection for children’s data and their privacy.

Available at: https://www.hrw.org/news/2023/04/03/brazil-online-learning-tools-harvest-childrens-data. Retrieved on: Feb 15, 2024. Adapted.

In the section of paragraph 4 “the third party would then scrutinize the data on behalf of the website to guess a user’s personality, their preferences, and what they are likely to do next”, the term scrutinize indicates that the third-party company would

 

Provas

Questão presente nas seguintes provas
3269773 Ano: 2024
Disciplina: Inglês (Língua Inglesa)
Banca: CESGRANRIO
Orgão: CPNU/CNU
Provas:

Brazil: Online Learning Tools Harvest Children’s Data

1 “Educational websites directed at Brazilian students, including two created by state education secretariats, monitored children and collected their personal data”, Human Rights Watch said today. “The national government should revise Brazil’s data protection law by adding new safeguards to protect children online”.

2 Analysis conducted by Human Rights Watch in November 2022 and reviewed again in January 2023 found that seven educational websites extracted and sent children’s data to third-party companies, using tracking technologies designed for advertising. These websites not only watched children inside of their online classrooms, but followed them across the internet, outside school hours, and deep into their private lives.

3 “Children and their families in Brazil are being kept in the dark about the data monitoring conducted on children in online classrooms,” said Hye Jung Han, children’s rights and technology researcher and advocate at Human Rights Watch. “Instead of protecting children, state governments have willfully enabled anyone to monitor them and collect their personal information online.”

4 Human Rights Watch found that five websites deployed particularly intrusive tracking techniques to invisibly spy on children in ways that were impossible to avoid or protect against. One of these websites uses session recording, a technique that allows a third party to watch and record a user’s behavior on a webpage. That includes mouse clicks and movements around a webpage; the digital equivalent of logging video monitoring each time a child scratches their nose or grasps their pencil in class. Typically, the third party would then scrutinize the data on behalf of the website to guess a user’s personality, their preferences, and what they are likely to do next, or how they might be influenced. Advertisers might use these insights to target the child with personalized content and ads that follow them across the internet.

5 Profiling, targeting, and advertising to children in this way infringes on their privacy, as it is neither proportionate nor necessary for these websites to function or deliver educational content. It also risks violating children’s other rights if this information is used to guide them toward outcomes that are harmful or not in their best interest. Such practices also play an enormous role in shaping children’s online experiences and determining the information they see, at a time in their lives when their opinions and beliefs are at high risk of manipulative interference.

6 Brazil’s data protection authority should stop these assaults on children’s privacy. It should require these companies and state governments to delete children’s data collected, and prevent them from further using children’s data for any purpose unrelated to providing education.

7 Brazil’s constitution protects the right to privacy. The country has also ratified the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child, which entitles children to special protections that guard their privacy. Brazil’s data protection law, however, – the Lei Geral de Proteção de Dados Pessoais, or the General Personal Data Protection Law – does not provide sufficient protections for children. It does not explicitly prohibit actors from exploiting children’s information or require them to provide high levels of safety and security for children. Lawmakers should amend the law to establish comprehensive child data protection rules, including bans on behavioral advertising and the use of intrusive tracking techniques on children. These rules should also require all actors offering online services to children – including online learning – to provide the highest levels of protection for children’s data and their privacy.

Available at: https://www.hrw.org/news/2023/04/03/brazil-online-learning-tools-harvest-childrens-data. Retrieved on: Feb 15, 2024. Adapted.

In the section of paragraph 4 “the third party would then scrutinize the data on behalf of the website to guess a user’s personality, their preferences, and what they are likely to do next”, the expression what they are likely to do next refers to the children’s

 

Provas

Questão presente nas seguintes provas
3269772 Ano: 2024
Disciplina: Inglês (Língua Inglesa)
Banca: CESGRANRIO
Orgão: CPNU/CNU
Provas:

Brazil: Online Learning Tools Harvest Children’s Data

1 “Educational websites directed at Brazilian students, including two created by state education secretariats, monitored children and collected their personal data”, Human Rights Watch said today. “The national government should revise Brazil’s data protection law by adding new safeguards to protect children online”.

2 Analysis conducted by Human Rights Watch in November 2022 and reviewed again in January 2023 found that seven educational websites extracted and sent children’s data to third-party companies, using tracking technologies designed for advertising. These websites not only watched children inside of their online classrooms, but followed them across the internet, outside school hours, and deep into their private lives.

3 “Children and their families in Brazil are being kept in the dark about the data monitoring conducted on children in online classrooms,” said Hye Jung Han, children’s rights and technology researcher and advocate at Human Rights Watch. “Instead of protecting children, state governments have willfully enabled anyone to monitor them and collect their personal information online.”

4 Human Rights Watch found that five websites deployed particularly intrusive tracking techniques to invisibly spy on children in ways that were impossible to avoid or protect against. One of these websites uses session recording, a technique that allows a third party to watch and record a user’s behavior on a webpage. That includes mouse clicks and movements around a webpage; the digital equivalent of logging video monitoring each time a child scratches their nose or grasps their pencil in class. Typically, the third party would then scrutinize the data on behalf of the website to guess a user’s personality, their preferences, and what they are likely to do next, or how they might be influenced. Advertisers might use these insights to target the child with personalized content and ads that follow them across the internet.

5 Profiling, targeting, and advertising to children in this way infringes on their privacy, as it is neither proportionate nor necessary for these websites to function or deliver educational content. It also risks violating children’s other rights if this information is used to guide them toward outcomes that are harmful or not in their best interest. Such practices also play an enormous role in shaping children’s online experiences and determining the information they see, at a time in their lives when their opinions and beliefs are at high risk of manipulative interference.

6 Brazil’s data protection authority should stop these assaults on children’s privacy. It should require these companies and state governments to delete children’s data collected, and prevent them from further using children’s data for any purpose unrelated to providing education.

7 Brazil’s constitution protects the right to privacy. The country has also ratified the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child, which entitles children to special protections that guard their privacy. Brazil’s data protection law, however, – the Lei Geral de Proteção de Dados Pessoais, or the General Personal Data Protection Law – does not provide sufficient protections for children. It does not explicitly prohibit actors from exploiting children’s information or require them to provide high levels of safety and security for children. Lawmakers should amend the law to establish comprehensive child data protection rules, including bans on behavioral advertising and the use of intrusive tracking techniques on children. These rules should also require all actors offering online services to children – including online learning – to provide the highest levels of protection for children’s data and their privacy.

Available at: https://www.hrw.org/news/2023/04/03/brazil-online-learning-tools-harvest-childrens-data. Retrieved on: Feb 15, 2024. Adapted.

In paragraph 3, the statement “Instead of protecting children, state governments have willfully enabled anyone to monitor them and collect their personal information online” means that the permission given by state governments to third-party companies was

 

Provas

Questão presente nas seguintes provas
3269771 Ano: 2024
Disciplina: Inglês (Língua Inglesa)
Banca: CESGRANRIO
Orgão: CPNU/CNU
Provas:

Brazil: Online Learning Tools Harvest Children’s Data

1 “Educational websites directed at Brazilian students, including two created by state education secretariats, monitored children and collected their personal data”, Human Rights Watch said today. “The national government should revise Brazil’s data protection law by adding new safeguards to protect children online”.

2 Analysis conducted by Human Rights Watch in November 2022 and reviewed again in January 2023 found that seven educational websites extracted and sent children’s data to third-party companies, using tracking technologies designed for advertising. These websites not only watched children inside of their online classrooms, but followed them across the internet, outside school hours, and deep into their private lives.

3 “Children and their families in Brazil are being kept in the dark about the data monitoring conducted on children in online classrooms,” said Hye Jung Han, children’s rights and technology researcher and advocate at Human Rights Watch. “Instead of protecting children, state governments have willfully enabled anyone to monitor them and collect their personal information online.”

4 Human Rights Watch found that five websites deployed particularly intrusive tracking techniques to invisibly spy on children in ways that were impossible to avoid or protect against. One of these websites uses session recording, a technique that allows a third party to watch and record a user’s behavior on a webpage. That includes mouse clicks and movements around a webpage; the digital equivalent of logging video monitoring each time a child scratches their nose or grasps their pencil in class. Typically, the third party would then scrutinize the data on behalf of the website to guess a user’s personality, their preferences, and what they are likely to do next, or how they might be influenced. Advertisers might use these insights to target the child with personalized content and ads that follow them across the internet.

5 Profiling, targeting, and advertising to children in this way infringes on their privacy, as it is neither proportionate nor necessary for these websites to function or deliver educational content. It also risks violating children’s other rights if this information is used to guide them toward outcomes that are harmful or not in their best interest. Such practices also play an enormous role in shaping children’s online experiences and determining the information they see, at a time in their lives when their opinions and beliefs are at high risk of manipulative interference.

6 Brazil’s data protection authority should stop these assaults on children’s privacy. It should require these companies and state governments to delete children’s data collected, and prevent them from further using children’s data for any purpose unrelated to providing education.

7 Brazil’s constitution protects the right to privacy. The country has also ratified the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child, which entitles children to special protections that guard their privacy. Brazil’s data protection law, however, – the Lei Geral de Proteção de Dados Pessoais, or the General Personal Data Protection Law – does not provide sufficient protections for children. It does not explicitly prohibit actors from exploiting children’s information or require them to provide high levels of safety and security for children. Lawmakers should amend the law to establish comprehensive child data protection rules, including bans on behavioral advertising and the use of intrusive tracking techniques on children. These rules should also require all actors offering online services to children – including online learning – to provide the highest levels of protection for children’s data and their privacy.

Available at: https://www.hrw.org/news/2023/04/03/brazil-online-learning-tools-harvest-childrens-data. Retrieved on: Feb 15, 2024. Adapted.

In the excerpt of paragraph 2 “These websites not only watched children inside of their online classrooms, but followed them across the internet”, the expression not only [...] but indicates

 

Provas

Questão presente nas seguintes provas
3269770 Ano: 2024
Disciplina: Inglês (Língua Inglesa)
Banca: CESGRANRIO
Orgão: CPNU/CNU
Provas:

Brazil: Online Learning Tools Harvest Children’s Data

1 “Educational websites directed at Brazilian students, including two created by state education secretariats, monitored children and collected their personal data”, Human Rights Watch said today. “The national government should revise Brazil’s data protection law by adding new safeguards to protect children online”.

2 Analysis conducted by Human Rights Watch in November 2022 and reviewed again in January 2023 found that seven educational websites extracted and sent children’s data to third-party companies, using tracking technologies designed for advertising. These websites not only watched children inside of their online classrooms, but followed them across the internet, outside school hours, and deep into their private lives.

3 “Children and their families in Brazil are being kept in the dark about the data monitoring conducted on children in online classrooms,” said Hye Jung Han, children’s rights and technology researcher and advocate at Human Rights Watch. “Instead of protecting children, state governments have willfully enabled anyone to monitor them and collect their personal information online.”

4 Human Rights Watch found that five websites deployed particularly intrusive tracking techniques to invisibly spy on children in ways that were impossible to avoid or protect against. One of these websites uses session recording, a technique that allows a third party to watch and record a user’s behavior on a webpage. That includes mouse clicks and movements around a webpage; the digital equivalent of logging video monitoring each time a child scratches their nose or grasps their pencil in class. Typically, the third party would then scrutinize the data on behalf of the website to guess a user’s personality, their preferences, and what they are likely to do next, or how they might be influenced. Advertisers might use these insights to target the child with personalized content and ads that follow them across the internet.

5 Profiling, targeting, and advertising to children in this way infringes on their privacy, as it is neither proportionate nor necessary for these websites to function or deliver educational content. It also risks violating children’s other rights if this information is used to guide them toward outcomes that are harmful or not in their best interest. Such practices also play an enormous role in shaping children’s online experiences and determining the information they see, at a time in their lives when their opinions and beliefs are at high risk of manipulative interference.

6 Brazil’s data protection authority should stop these assaults on children’s privacy. It should require these companies and state governments to delete children’s data collected, and prevent them from further using children’s data for any purpose unrelated to providing education.

7 Brazil’s constitution protects the right to privacy. The country has also ratified the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child, which entitles children to special protections that guard their privacy. Brazil’s data protection law, however, – the Lei Geral de Proteção de Dados Pessoais, or the General Personal Data Protection Law – does not provide sufficient protections for children. It does not explicitly prohibit actors from exploiting children’s information or require them to provide high levels of safety and security for children. Lawmakers should amend the law to establish comprehensive child data protection rules, including bans on behavioral advertising and the use of intrusive tracking techniques on children. These rules should also require all actors offering online services to children – including online learning – to provide the highest levels of protection for children’s data and their privacy.

Available at: https://www.hrw.org/news/2023/04/03/brazil-online-learning-tools-harvest-childrens-data. Retrieved on: Feb 15, 2024. Adapted.

In the segment of paragraph 2 “These websites not only watched children inside of their online classrooms, but followed them across the internet”, the term them refers to

 

Provas

Questão presente nas seguintes provas
3269769 Ano: 2024
Disciplina: Inglês (Língua Inglesa)
Banca: CESGRANRIO
Orgão: CPNU/CNU
Provas:

Brazil: Online Learning Tools Harvest Children’s Data

1 “Educational websites directed at Brazilian students, including two created by state education secretariats, monitored children and collected their personal data”, Human Rights Watch said today. “The national government should revise Brazil’s data protection law by adding new safeguards to protect children online”.

2 Analysis conducted by Human Rights Watch in November 2022 and reviewed again in January 2023 found that seven educational websites extracted and sent children’s data to third-party companies, using tracking technologies designed for advertising. These websites not only watched children inside of their online classrooms, but followed them across the internet, outside school hours, and deep into their private lives.

3 “Children and their families in Brazil are being kept in the dark about the data monitoring conducted on children in online classrooms,” said Hye Jung Han, children’s rights and technology researcher and advocate at Human Rights Watch. “Instead of protecting children, state governments have willfully enabled anyone to monitor them and collect their personal information online.”

4 Human Rights Watch found that five websites deployed particularly intrusive tracking techniques to invisibly spy on children in ways that were impossible to avoid or protect against. One of these websites uses session recording, a technique that allows a third party to watch and record a user’s behavior on a webpage. That includes mouse clicks and movements around a webpage; the digital equivalent of logging video monitoring each time a child scratches their nose or grasps their pencil in class. Typically, the third party would then scrutinize the data on behalf of the website to guess a user’s personality, their preferences, and what they are likely to do next, or how they might be influenced. Advertisers might use these insights to target the child with personalized content and ads that follow them across the internet.

5 Profiling, targeting, and advertising to children in this way infringes on their privacy, as it is neither proportionate nor necessary for these websites to function or deliver educational content. It also risks violating children’s other rights if this information is used to guide them toward outcomes that are harmful or not in their best interest. Such practices also play an enormous role in shaping children’s online experiences and determining the information they see, at a time in their lives when their opinions and beliefs are at high risk of manipulative interference.

6 Brazil’s data protection authority should stop these assaults on children’s privacy. It should require these companies and state governments to delete children’s data collected, and prevent them from further using children’s data for any purpose unrelated to providing education.

7 Brazil’s constitution protects the right to privacy. The country has also ratified the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child, which entitles children to special protections that guard their privacy. Brazil’s data protection law, however, – the Lei Geral de Proteção de Dados Pessoais, or the General Personal Data Protection Law – does not provide sufficient protections for children. It does not explicitly prohibit actors from exploiting children’s information or require them to provide high levels of safety and security for children. Lawmakers should amend the law to establish comprehensive child data protection rules, including bans on behavioral advertising and the use of intrusive tracking techniques on children. These rules should also require all actors offering online services to children – including online learning – to provide the highest levels of protection for children’s data and their privacy.

Available at: https://www.hrw.org/news/2023/04/03/brazil-online-learning-tools-harvest-childrens-data. Retrieved on: Feb 15, 2024. Adapted.

The main purpose of the text is to

 

Provas

Questão presente nas seguintes provas
3269753 Ano: 2024
Disciplina: Matemática
Banca: CESGRANRIO
Orgão: CPNU/CNU
Provas:

Com as alterações climáticas no planeta, o comportamento da temperatura em uma certa cidade sofreu algumas alterações, subindo basicamente em todas as estações do ano.

Considere que, no ano 2000, a temperatura (T), em ºC, possa ser calculada de forma aproximada pela seguinte relação envolvendo operações trigonométricas:

T(t) = 20 + 16 × sen \( \left(\dfrac{\pi t}{6}-\dfrac{4\pi\ }{6}\right) \)

com 0 ≤ t ≤ 12, sendo t=0 (dezembro de 1999) e t =12 (dezembro de 2000).

Considere ainda que, no ano 2020, a temperatura (T), em o C, possa ser calculada de forma aproximada pela seguinte relação envolvendo operações trigonométricas:

T(t) = 24 + 16 × sen \( \begin{pmatrix} \dfrac{\pi t}{6}-\dfrac{4\pi }{6}\end{pmatrix} \)

com 0 ≤ t ≤ 12, sendo t=0 (dezembro de 2019) e t =12 (dezembro de 2020).

Considerando-se esses modelos, o valor máximo dessa temperatura, em ºC, no ano de 2020, foi igual a

 

Provas

Questão presente nas seguintes provas
3269734 Ano: 2024
Disciplina: Atualidades e Conhecimentos Gerais
Banca: CESGRANRIO
Orgão: CPNU/CNU
Provas:

O objetivo das ferramentas e aplicações de inteligência artificial deve sempre estar dirigido à melhoria da qualidade de vida das pessoas, postulando a inclusão daquelas parcelas da população historicamente discriminadas e pouco representadas.

Nesse contexto, a Inteligência Artificial caracteriza-se por

 

Provas

Questão presente nas seguintes provas
3269733 Ano: 2024
Disciplina: Atualidades e Conhecimentos Gerais
Banca: CESGRANRIO
Orgão: CPNU/CNU
Provas:

Considere o texto sobre discriminação social no Brasil.

Os idosos correspondem a quase 15% da população brasileira. Apesar das estatísticas de aumento da longevidade nos últimos tempos, eles ainda sofrem preconceito. Em meio às limitações no mercado de trabalho e estereótipos que ditam os locais, roupas e estilo de vida que devem ser adotados, essa parcela da população tem se mostrado cada vez mais ativa, revelando como a longevidade pode ser positiva. O tema ganhou repercussão no Brasil no início de 2023 após a divulgação de um vídeo em que estudantes de uma universidade particular debocham de uma colega de 40 anos. No vídeo, uma das estudantes ironiza: “Gente, quiz do dia: como ‘desmatricula’ um colega de sala?”. Logo na sequência, outra jovem responde: “Mano, ela tem 40 anos já. Era para estar aposentada”. “Realmente”, concorda a terceira fazendo uma cara de deboche.

Disponível em: https://www.cnnbrasil.com.br/saude/[...]. Acesso em: 26 fev. 2024.

O tipo de discriminação social mencionado e a sua qualificação legal correspondem especificamente ao

 

Provas

Questão presente nas seguintes provas
3269732 Ano: 2024
Disciplina: Atualidades e Conhecimentos Gerais
Banca: CESGRANRIO
Orgão: CPNU/CNU
Provas:

Considere o texto sobre a matriz energética brasileira.

Em 2021, representantes do Governo Federal participaram da 26ª Conferência das Nações Unidas sobre Mudanças Climáticas (COP26), em Glasgow, na Escócia. [...] Segundo o Ministério de Minas e Energia, o Brasil é exemplo mundial em transição energética, com mais de 85% da matriz elétrica oriunda de fontes limpas e renováveis e 48% de renovabilidade em sua matriz energética total. Nessa direção, o Brasil registrou, até fevereiro de 2023, 890 parques eólicos instalados em 12 estados brasileiros. Eles somam 25,04 gigawatts de capacidade instalada em operação comercial, que beneficiam 108,7 milhões de habitantes.

Disponível em: https://www.gov.br/casacivil/pt-br/assuntos/noticias/2021/novembro/o-brasil-e-exemplo-mundial-em-transicao-energetica e https: //agenciabrasil.ebc.com.br/economia/noticia/2023-04/capacidade-de-geracao-de-energia-eolica-deve-bater-recorde-neste-ano. Acesso em: 26 fev. 2024. Adaptado.

No Brasil, do total de parques eólicos instalados, a maioria se encontra na Região

 

Provas

Questão presente nas seguintes provas