Read the fourth part of the article and analyze the statements I – IV.

So much of the current Web was designed around aggregation—lists of product recommendations on The Strategist, summaries of film reviews on Rotten Tomatoes, restaurant reviews on Yelp. What value will those sites have when A.I. can do the aggregation for us? If Google Search is an imperfect book index, telling us where to find the material we need, Bing A.I. is SparkNotes, allowing us to bypass the source material altogether. Users might simply “read” publications in the form of A.I. chat summaries, as if listening to a mechanized butler reciting newspaper headlines aloud. The paradox of A.I., though, is that it relies on the source material— the vast sea of information that other sites create—to generate its answers. For that reason, it’s easy to imagine a kind of vicious cycle caused by the widespread adoption of tools like Bing A.I. If users don’t have to visit sites directly anymore, then those sites’ business models, based on advertising and subscriptions, will collapse. But if those sites can no longer produce content then A.I. tools won’t have fresh, reliable material to digest and regurgitate.

I. The verb in the statement ‘So much of the current Web was designed around aggregation’ is in the passive voice.

II. In ‘What value will those sites have when A.I. can do the aggregation for us?’, ‘when’ is used to refer to place.

III. The conjunction ‘though’ in ‘The paradox of A.I., though, is that it relies on the source material’ expresses contrast.

IV. ‘If users don’t have to visit sites directly anymore, then those sites’ business models (…) will collapse’ is an example of a first conditional clause.

It is completely accurate what is stated in

Read the third part of the article. All the alternatives present accurate analyses of word formation of the underlined words, EXCEPT

Though tools like Bing A.I. promise extreme, almost unimaginable convenience for users, they are likely to be even worse for content creators than the search and social-media companies that have siphoned up the majority of digital-advertising dollars over the past decade. Bing A.I. does offer referrals to Web sites in the form of footnotes linking to URLs. But the URLs are intentionally unobtrusive, to minimize for users what one Microsoft staffer described to me as the “cognitive load” of having to click on and scroll through links. The other day, Mody demonstrated over video chat how she could ask Bing A.I. to find a good vegetarian recipe for dinner. The bot pulled up a Bon Appétit recipe for vegetarian lasagna and reprinted it in full within the chat. Then Mody asked it to list all of the ingredients and arrange them by grocery-store aisle—a request that no cooking Web site could hope to fulfill.

Read the second part of the article. What do we learn from the experience of using ChatGPT?

Bing A.I., which I’ve had the chance to test-drive in recent weeks, is essentially ChatGPT hooked up to Microsoft’s search directory. Using it is like talking to a very powerful librarian whose purview is the breadth of the Internet. The old search experience is almost second nature to today’s Internet users: enter relevant keywords into Google, press Enter, and sift through the list of links that show up on the results page. Then click through to find the info you’re looking for. If you don’t find it, perhaps return to the Google Search page and tinker with your keywords to try again. With Bing A.I., Web sites are the source material, not the destination, and results are produced through what Danzico called a “co-creation process” between user and bot. I asked it which toaster Wirecutter recommended, and within a few seconds, and without ever leaving the Bing A.I. page, I had a digest of reputable devices. The chatbot wouldn’t tell me precisely which one to buy, however. “I can’t make decisions for you because I’m not a human,” it said.

In some ways, a Bing A.I. user has more agency than a user of Google Search. You communicate not in isolated keywords but in straightforward sentences, and you can narrow or refine your query results by asking the machine follow-ups. If you request an itinerary for a trip to Iceland, for instance, and then ask, “What time does the sun set there?” the bot will understand which “there” you’re referring to. But, in other ways, the Bing user is more limited and passive, encouraged to let the machine decide which information is worthwhile rather than doing any searching on their own. “It’s your travel guide, your bank, your confidante, your guide,” Danzico said. The “conversation mode” interface—a single chat box on top of a gentle color gradient—reflects that one-stop-shop objective. Where using Google Search sometimes feels like engineering the right equation to solve a problem, using Bing A.I. is a bit like a series of text-message conversations. It even punctuates answers with a smiling, blushing emoji: “I’m always happy to chat with you. ,” it told me.

Read the initial part of the article. It is correct to state that

Around a year ago, I wrote a column about users’ growing frustration with Google Search, as automated summaries, sponsored content, and S.E.O.-tailored spam increasingly crowded out the kinds of useful Web site results that Googling was supposed to produce. Google’s search algorithm wasn’t directing us to the information that we wanted to find (for instance, in my case at the time, the elusive perfect toaster) so much as bombarding us with the half-baked recommendations of content mills. Yet Google Search has maintained its dominance partly out of habit and partly because no competing service has offered a viable alternative—until now. On February 7th, Microsoft began a beta launch of a version of its search engine, Bing, in the form of an A.I. chatbot, powered by GPT-4, the latest iteration of OpenAI’s large language model ChatGPT. Instead of directing users to external sites, the new Bing can simply generate its own answers to any query. Google considers the tool to be an existential threat to its core business, for good reason. At the end of last year, the Times reported that the company had declared a “code red.” Microsoft’s vice-president of design Liz Danzico, who helped to develop Bing A.I.’s interface, told me recently, “We’re in a post-search experience.”

A União Soviética foi uma das maiores potências militares e econômicas do século XX, porém, nos anos 1980, entrou em decadência.

Nesse contexto, assinale a alternativa correta sobre o que foram a Glasnost e a Perestroika.

No contexto do século XIX, nas tratativas pelo fim da escravidão no Brasil, foi aprovada em 1845 a Lei Bill Aberdeen.

Sobre essa lei, assinale a alternativa correta.

No contexto da ditadura civil-militar (1964-1985), assinale a alternativa correta sobre a Lei da Anistia de 1979.

A respeito do governo de Getúlio Vargas que ocorreu entre 1951 a 1954, informe se é verdadeiro (V) ou falso (F) o que se afirma a seguir e assinale a alternativa com a sequência correta.

( ) Conhecido como Estado Novo, foi um governo ditatorial, tendo como uma de suas marcas a criação do Departamento de Imprensa e Propaganda (DIP), que era instrumento de censura e propaganda do regime.

( ) Nesse governo foi criada uma das principais estatais brasileiras, a Petrobras. Getúlio Vargas subiu ao posto de presidente nesse mandato por meio de eleições diretas.

( ) Getúlio não conseguiu finalizar sua gestão, tendo em vista que sofreu um impeachment após a acusação de ser o mandante do ataque ao jornalista Carlos Lacerda.

Assinale a alternativa que apresenta um dos povos indígenas nativos que habitavam a região de Vitória da Conquista antes da chegada dos portugueses.

Analise as assertivas e assinale a alternativa que corresponde aos eventos da Primeira Guerra Mundial (1914-1918).

I. Retirada do Império Russo da Guerra em 1917, devido, principalmente, à Revolução Bolchevique de 1917.

II. Entrada dos Estados Unidos, em 1917, no bloco dos países da Tríplice Entente, ajudando a finalizar a guerra em 1918.

III. Brasil entra na guerra em 1916 na Tríplice Entente, enviando tropas para combater na Alemanha e principalmente na Itália.

Está(ão) correta(s):